Strategic effects on object-based attentional selection

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 103, Issue 1-2, 1999, Pages 1-19

  Cepeda, Nicholas J ^a   Kramer, Arthur F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Comparison strategies; Object based attention; Visual attention

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; EYE FIXATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0347091160     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6918(99)00021-9     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bashinski, H. S., & Bacharach, V. R. (1980). Enhancement of perceptual sensitivity as a result of selectively attending to spatial locations. Perception and Psychophysics, 28, 241-248.
2. Baylis, G., & Driver, J. (1993). Visual attention and objects: Evidence for hierarchical coding of location. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 19, 451-470.
3. Baylis, G., & Driver, J. (1992). Visual parsing and response competition: The effect of grouping factors. Perception and Psychophysics, 51, 145-162.
4. Behrmann, M., & Moscovitch, M. (1994). Object-centered neglect in patients with unilateral neglect effects of left-right coordinates of objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 1-16.
5. Behrmann, M., & Tipper, S. P. (1999). Attention accesses multiple references frames: Evidence from visual neglect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 83-101.
6. Behrmann, M., Zemel, R., & Mozer, M. C. (1998). Object-based attention and occlusion evidence from normal subjects and a computational model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1011-1036.
7. Dowing, C., & Pinker, S. (1985). The spatial structure of visual attention. In M. Posner & O. Martin, Attention and performance XI (pp. 171-187). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Driver, J., & Halligan, P. (1991). Can visual neglect operate in object-centered coordinates?. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8, 475-496.
9. Duncan, J. (1993). Similarity between concurrent visual discriminations: Dimensions and objects. Perception and Psychophysics, 54, 425-430.
10. Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501-517.
11. Egly, R., Driver, J., & Rafal, R. (1994a). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 123, 161-177.
12. Egly, R., Rafal, R., Driver, J., & Starrveveld, Y. (1994b). Covert orienting in the split brain reveals hemispheric specialization for object-based attention. Psychological Science, 5, 380-383.
13. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters on the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
14. Eriksen, C. W., & James, J. D. St. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Perception and Psychophysics, 40, 225-240.
15. Forster, B., Gebhardt, R. P., Lindlar, K., Siemann, M., & Delius, J. D. (1996). Mental-rotation effect: A function of elementary stimulus discriminability?. Perception, 25, 1301-1316.
16. Hahn, S., & Kramer, A. F. (1998). Further evidence for the division of attention among non-contiguous locations. Visual Cognition, 5, 217-256.
17. Hillyard, S., Anllo-Vento, L., Clark, V., Heinze, H., Luck, S. & Mangun, G.R. (1996). Neuroimaging approaches to the study of visual attention. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles & G. D. Logan, Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 107-138). Washington, DC: APA Press.
18. Hoffman, J. E., & Nelson, B. (1981). Spatial selectivity in visual search. Perception and Psychophysics, 30, 283-290.
19. Humphreys, G., Olson, A., Romani, C., & Riddoch, M. (1996). Competitive mechanisms of selection by object and space: A neuropsychological approach. In A. Kramer, M. Coles & G. Logan, Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 365-393). Washington, DC: APA Press.
20. Humphreys, G., & Riddoch, M. (1993). Interactions between object and space vision revealed through neuropsychology. In D. Meyer & S. Kornblum, Attention and performance XIV. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Kramer, A. F., & Hahn, S. (1995). Splitting the beam: Distribution of attention over noncontiguous regions of the visual field. Psychological Science, 6, 381-386.
22. Kramer, A. F., & Jacobson, A. (1991). Perceptual organization and focused attention: the role of objects and proximity in visual processing. Perception and Psychophysics, 50, 267-284.
23. Kramer, A. & Watson, S. (1996). Object-based visual selection and the principle of uniform connectedness. In A. Kramer, M. Coles & G. Logan, Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 395-414). Washington, DC: APA Press.
24. Kramer, A. F., Weber, T., & Watson, S. (1997). Object-based attentional selection: grouped-arrays or spatially-invariant representations? Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 126, 3-13.
25. Kramer, A. F., Wickens, C. D., & Donchin, E. (1985). The processing of stimulus properties evidence for dual task integrality. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 11, 393-408.
26. LaBerge, D., & Brown, V. (1989). Theory of attentional operation in shape identification. Psychological Review, 96, 101-124.
27. Lavie, N., & Driver, J. (1996). On the spatial extent of attention in object-based visual selection. Perception and Psychophysics, 58, 1238-1251.
28. Moore, C. M., Yantis, S., & Vaughan, B. (1998). Object-based visual selection: Evidence from perceptual completion. Psychological Science, 9, 104-110.
29. Pellizer, G., & Georgopoulos, A. P. (1993). Mental rotation of the intended direction of movement. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 12-17.
30. Posner, M. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
31. Posner, M., Walker, J., Friedrich, F., & Rafal, R. (1984). Effects of parietal lobe injury on covert orienting of visual attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 4, 1863-1874.
32. Riddoch, M., & Humphreys, G. (1983). The effect of cueing on unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia, 21, 588-599.
33. Shepard, R. N., & Cooper, L. A. (1982). Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701-703.
35. Tagaris, G. A., Kim, G. G., Strupp, J. P., Andersen, P., Ugurbil, K., & Georgopoulos, A. P. (1997). Mental rotation studied by functional magnetic resonance imaging at high field: (4 T) performance and cortical activation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 419-432.
36. Tipper, S. P., & Behrmann, M. (1996). Object-centered not scene-based visual neglect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1261-1278.
37. Tipper, S. P., Driver, J., & Weaver, B. (1991). Object-centered inhibition of return of visual attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 43, 289-298.
38. Vecera, S. P., & Farah, M. J. (1994). Does visual attention select objects or locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 123, 146-160.
39. Watson, S., & Kramer, A.F. (in press). Object-based visual selective attention and perceptual organization. Perception and Psychophysics.
40. Weber, T., Kramer, A. F., & Miller, G. (1997). Selective processing of superimposed objects: An electrophysiological analysis of object-based attentional selection. Biological Psychology, 45, 159-182.
41. Yantis, S. (1996). Attentional capture in vision. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles & G. D. Logan, Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 45-76). Washington, DC: APA Press.
42. Yantis, S. (1992). Multielement visual tracking: Attention and perceptual organization. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 295-340.
43. Yantis, S., Meyer, D. E., & Smith, J. E. K. (1991). Analyses of multinomial mixture distributions: New tests for stochastic models of cognition and action. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 350-374.