Total factor productivity and the spillover hypothesis: Some new evidence

International Journal of Production Economics

Volumn 92, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 31-42

  Sena, Vania ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

DEA; Productivity; Spillover effects

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; PROBLEM SOLVING; PRODUCTIVITY; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

CAPITAL EQUIPMENTS; DEA; INTER-INDUSTRY RELATIONS; SPILLOVER EFFECTS;

PRODUCTION ENGINEERING;

EID: 4644297672     PISSN: 09255273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2003.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Acs Z.I., Audretsch D.B., Feldman J.P. Real effects of academic research. Comment American Economic Review. 82(1):1992;363-367.
2. Aghion P., Howitt P. Endogenous Growth Theory. 1998;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
3. Arrow K. The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies. 29(80):1962;155-173.
4. Audretsch D.B., Felman M.P. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review. 86(3):1996;630-640.
5. Basu S. Pro-cyclical productivity. Increasing returns or cyclical utilisation Quarterly Journal of Economics. 104:1996;719-751.
6. Bernstein J.I. Costs of production, intra- and interindustry R&D spillovers. Canadian evidence Canadian Journal of Economics. 21:1988;324-347.
7. Bernstein, J.I., Nadiri, M.I., 1988. Research and development and intra-industry spillovers: An empirical application of dynamic duality. NYU Working Paper.
8. Bernstein, J.I., Nadiri, M.I., 1991. Product demand, cost of production, spillover and the social rate of return to R&D. NBER Working Paper No. 3625.
9. Blomström M., Kokko A. Multinational corporations and spillovers. Journal of Economic Surveys. 12(2):1998;1-25.
10. Caves D., Christensen L., Diewert W.E. The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output and productivity. Econometrica. 50(6):1982;1393-1414.
11. Ciccone A., Hall R. Productivity and the density of economic activity. American Economic Review. 86(1):1996;54-70.
12. Cohen W.M., Levinthal D.A. Innovation and learning. Two faces of R&D Economic Journal. 99:1989;569-596.
13. Dilling Hansen M., Madsen E.S., Smith V. Efficiency, R&D and ownership. Some empirical evidence International Journal of Production Economics. 83(1):2003;85-94.
14. Englander A.S., Evenson R., Hanazaki M. R&D, innovation and the total factor productivity slowdown. OECD Economic Studies. 11:1988;7-42.
15. Fare R., Grosskopf S., Lindgren B., Roos P. Productivity in Swedish pharmacies. A Malmquist input index approach Journal of Productivity Analysis. 3(1/2):1992;270-285.
16. Geroski P.A. Innovation and the sectoral sources of UK productivity growth. Economic Journal. 101:1991;1438-1451.
17. Geroski, P.A., Small, I., Walters, C.F., 1998. Agglomeration economies, technology spillovers and company productivity growth. Discussion Paper No. 1867, CEPR, London.
18. Golinelli, R., Monterastrelli, M., 1990. Un metodo per la ricostruzione di serie storiche compatibili con la nuova Contabilita' Nazionale. Nota di lavoro, n. 9001, Prometeia, Bologna.
19. Goto A., Suzuki K. R&D capital, rate of return on R&D investment and spillover of R&D in Japanese manufacturing industries. Review of Economics and Statistics. 71:1989;555-564.
20. Greene W.H. Econometric Analysis. 1993;MacMillan, New Jersey.
21. Griliches Z. Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics. 10:1979;1.
22. Griliches Z. Patent statistics as economic indicators. A survey Journal of Economic Literature. 28:1990;1661-1707.
23. Griliches Z., Lichtenberg F. Interindustry technology flows and productivity growth. A re-examination Review of Economics and Statistics. 61:1984;324-329.
24. Griliches Z., Pakes A., Hall B. The value of patents as indicators of inventive activity. Dasgupta P., Stoneman P. Economic Policy and Technological Performance. 1987;97-124 CUP, Cambridge.
25. Grosskopf S. Efficiency and productivity. Fried H., Lovell C.A.K., Schmidt P. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. 1993;160-194 Oxford University Press, Oxford.
26. Grossman G., Helpman E. Trade, innovation and growth. American Economic Review. 80-2:1990;86-91.
27. Hausman J.A. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica. 46:1978;1215-1271.
28. Hay D.A., Liu G.S. The efficiency of firms. What difference does competition make? Economic Journal. 107:1997;597-617.
29. Jaffe A. Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D. Evidence from firm's patents, profits and market value American Economic Review. 76:1986;984-1001.
30. Jaffe A. Real effect of academic research. American Economic Review. 79:1989;957-970.
31. Jaffe A., Trajtenberg M., Henderson R. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 108(3):1993;577-598.
32. Mansfield E. R&D and innovation: Some empirical findings. Griliches Z. R&D, Patents and Productivity. 1984;127-148 University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
33. Marshall A. Principles of Economics. 1920;MacMillan, London.
34. Mediocredito Centrale, 1997. Indagine sulle imprese manifatturiere. Sesto Rapporto sull'Industria Italiana e sulla Politica Industriale, Roma, Italy.
35. van Meijl H. Measuring intersectoral spillovers. French evidence Economic Systems Research. 9(1):1997;25-46.
36. Mohnen P., Nadiri M.I., Prucha I. R&D, production structure and rates of returns in the US, Japanese and German manufacturing sectors. European Economic Review. 30:1986;749-771.
37. Murillo Zamorano L.R., Vega Cervera J.A. The use of parametric and non-parametric frontier methods to measure the productive efficiency in the industrial sector. A comparative study International Journal of Production Economics. 69(3):2001;265-275.
38. Nadiri, I.M., 1993. Innovations and technological spillovers. NBER Working Paper No. 4423.
39. Nordhaus W.D. Invention, Growth and Welfare. 1962;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
40. Park W.G. International R&D spillovers and OECD economic growth. Economic Inquiry. 33(4):1995;571-591.
41. Poyago-Theotoky J., Beath J., Siegel D.S. Universities and fundamental research. Reflections on the growth of university-industry partnerships Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 18(1):2002;10-21.
42. Raut L.K. R&D spillover and productivity growth. Evidence from Indian private firms Journal of Development Economics. 48:1995;1-23.
43. Raut, L.K., Srinivasan, T.N., 1993. Theories of economic growth: Old and new. In: Basu, K., Majumdar, M., Mitra, T. (Eds.), Capital Investment and Development, Basil Blackwell, Basingstoke.
44. Ravenscraft D., Scherer F.M. The lag structure of returns to R&D. Applied Economics. 14:1982;603-620.
45. Romer P.M. Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Public Economics. 94:1986;1002-1037.
46. Scherer F.M. Interindustry technology flows and productivity growth. Review of Economics and Statistics. 64:1982;627-634.
47. Scherer F.M. Using linked patent and R&D data to measure interindustry technology clows. Griliches Z. R&D, Patents and Productivity. 1984;417-464 University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
48. Scott M.F.G. A New Theory of Economic Growth. 1991;Oxford University Press, Oxford.
49. Vuori S. Interindustry technology flows and productivity in Finnish manufacturing. Economic Systems Research. 9(1):1997;67-80.
50. Wolff E.N., Nadiri M.I. Spillover effects, linkage structure, technical progress and research and development. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 4:1993;315-331.