Efficiency, R & D and ownership - Some empirical evidence

International Journal of Production Economics

Volumn 83, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 85-94

  Dilling Hansen, Mogens ^a,c   Madsen, Erik Strøjer ^b,c   Smith, Valdemar ^b,c  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b AARHUS SCHOOL OF BUSINESS   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Block owners; Efficiency; Productivity; R D

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; INVESTMENTS; PRODUCTIVITY; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT;

BLOCK OWNERS;

INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0037464631     PISSN: 09255273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0925-5273(02)00302-X     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Aigner D., Lovell C.A.K., Schmidt P. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics. 6:1977;21-37.
2. Battese G.E., Coelli T.J. A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics. 20:1995;325-332.
3. Coelli T., Rao D.S., Battese G.E. An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston. 1998.
4. Dilling-Hansen M., Eriksson T., Madsen E.S., Smith V. Konkurrenceforholdenes betydning for danske virksomheders produktivitet. Nationaløkonomisk Tidsskrift. 136:1998;138-151.
5. Farrell M.J. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 120(Series A):1957;253-290.
6. Førsund F.R., Lovell C.A.K., Schmidt P. A survey of frontier production functions and of their relationship to efficiency measurement. Journal of Econometrics. 13:1980;5-25.
7. Greene W.H. LIMDEP Version 7.0 User's Manual (Revised Edition). 1998;Econometric Software Inc. Plainview, NY.
8. Griliches Z. R&D and Productivity. The Econometric Evidence. 1998;The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
9. Gugler K. Corporate Governance and Economic Performance. 2001;Oxford University Press, Oxford.
10. Hay D., Liu G.S. The efficiency of firms. What difference does competition make? The Economic Journal. 107:1997;597-617.
11. Jensen M. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. American Economic Review. 76:1986;323-329.
12. Laursen K. Trade Specialisation, Technology and Economic Growth. Theory and Evidence from Advanced Countries:2000;Edgar Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
13. Leibenstein H. Allocative efficiency vs. 'X-efficiency'. American Economic Review. 56:1966;392-415.
14. Meeusen W., van den Broeck J. Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. International Economic Review. 18(2):1977;435-444.
15. Morck, R., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W., 1988. Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics.
16. Nickell S. The Performance of Companies. The Relationship between the External Environment Management Strategies and Corporate Performance. 1995;Basil Blackwell Inc. Oxford, UK.
17. Nickell S.J. Competition and Corporate Performance. Journal of Political Economy. 104(41):1996;724-746.
18. Nickell S., Nicolitsas D., Dryden N. What makes firms perform well? European Economic Review. 41:1997;783-796.
19. Pavitt K. Sectoral patterns of technical change. Towards a taxonomy and theory Research Policy. 13(6):1984;343-373.
20. Short H. Ownership, control, financial structure and the performance of Firms. Journal of Economic Surveys. 8:1994;203-249.
21. Schumpeter J. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. 1942;Harper & Row, New York.
22. Smith V., Dilling-Hansen M., Eriksson T., Madsen E.S. R&D and Productivity in Danish Firms. Some empirical evidence Analyseinstitut for Forskning. 2000/4:2000;1-23.