Some suggested guidelines for geomorphic aspects of anadromous salmonid habitat restoration proposals

Restoration Ecology

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 48-56

  Kondolf, G Mathias ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Sacramento River; Salmonid habitat; San Joaquin River; Stream restoration

Indexed keywords

GEOMORPHOLOGY; HABITAT RESTORATION; HOLISTIC APPROACH; SALMONID;

UNITED STATES;

SALMONIDAE;

EID: 0034106028     PISSN: 10612971     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1526-100X.2000.80007.x     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abbe, T. B., and D. R. Montgomery. 1996. Large woody debris jams, channel hydraulics, and habitat formation in large rivers. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 12:201-221.
2. Beechie, T. E., L. Beamer, and L. Wasserman. 1994. Estimating coho salmon rearing habitat and smolt production losses in a large river basin, and implications for restoration. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 14:797-811.
3. Bevenger, G. S., and R. M. King. 1995. A pebble count procedure for assessing watershed cumulative effects. U.S.D.A. Forest Service Research Paper RM-RP-319. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, Colorado.
4. Brookes, A., and F. D. Shields. 1996. River channel restoration: guiding principles for sustainable projects. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, United Kingdom.
5. Buffington, J. M., D. R. Montgomery, and H. M. Greenberg. 1997. Geomorphic controls on salmonid spawning grounds. Pages 98-99 in Abstracts, Fourth International Conference on Geomorphology, 28 August-3 September 1997, Bologna, Italy. Supplementi di Geografia Fisica e Dinamica Quaternaria, Comitato Glaciologico Italiano, Torino, Italy.
6. Burner, C. J. 1951. Characteristics of spawning nests of Columbia River salmon. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Bulletin 61:97-110.
7. California Department of Fish and Game. 1999. Request for proposals, 1999-2000 fishery restoration grants program. Inland Fisheries Division, California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento.
8. California Department of Water Resources. 1982. California's stream resources, Volume I: Overview and assessment. Bulletin 215. California Department of Water Resources, Sacramento, California.
9. California Department of Water Resources. 1984. Dams within jurisdiction of the State of California. Bulletin 17-84. Department of Water Resources, Sacramento, California.
10. Cantara Trustee Council. 1998. 1998 Annual Report. Cantara Trustee Council, Redding, California.
11. Collins, B., and T. Dunne. 1990. Fluvial geomorphology and river gravel mining: a guide for planners, case studies included. California Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 98, Sacramento.
12. Dunne, T., and L. B. Leopold. 1978. Water in environmental planning. W.H. Freeman and Sons, San Francisco, California.
13. Everest, F. H., R. L Beschta, J. C. Scrivener, K. V. Koski, J. R. Sedell, and C. J. Cederholm. 1987. Fine sediment and salmonid production - a paradox. Pages 98-142 in E. O. Salo and T. W. Cundy, editors. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle.
14. Frissell, C. A., and R. K. Nawa. 1992. Incidence and causes of physical failure of artificial habitat structures in streams of western Oregon and Washington. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 12:182-197.
15. Harrelson, C. C., C. L. Rawlins, and J. P. Potyondy. 1994. Stream channel reference sites: an illustrated guide to field technique. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service General Technical Report RM-245. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, Colorado.
16. Healey, M. C. 1991. Life history of chinook salmon. Pages 311-394 in C. Groot and L. Margolis, editors. Pacific salmon life histories. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, Canada.
17. Healey, M., W. Kimmerer, G. M. Kondolf, R. Meade, P. B. Moyle, and R. Twiss. 1998. Strategic Plan for the Ecosystem Restoration Program. CALFED Bay-Delta Program, Sacramento, California.
18. Iversen, T. M., B. Kronvang, B. L. Madsen, P. Markmann, and M. B. Nielsen. 1993. Re-establishment of Danish streams: restoration and maintenance measures. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 3:73-92.
19. Kondolf, G. M. 1995. Five elements for effective evaluation of stream restoration. Restoration Ecology 3(2):133-136.
20. Kondolf, G. M. 1997. Application of the pebble count: reflections on purpose, method, and variants. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 33:79-87.
21. Kondolf, G. M. 2000. Assessing salmonid spawning gravels. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 129:262-261.
22. Kondolf, G. M., and P. Downs. 1996. Catchment approach to channel restoration. Pages 129-148 in A. Brookes and D. Shields, editors. River channel restoration. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, United Kingdom.
23. Kondolf, G. M., and W. V. G. Matthews. 1991. Unmeasured residuals in sediment budgets: a cautionary note. Water Resources Research 27:2483-2486.
24. Kondolf, G. M., and E. M. Micheli. 1995. Evaluating stream restoration projects. Environmental Management 19:1-15.
25. Kondolf, G. M., J. C. Vick, and T. M. Ramirez. 1996a. Salmon spawning habitat rehabilitation on the Merced River, California: an evaluation of project planning and performance. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 125:899-912.
26. Kondolf, G.M., J.C. Vick, and T. Ramirez. 1996b. Salmonid spawning habitat restoration in the San Joaquin River basin, California: an evaluation of project planning and success. Report No. 90. Centers for Water and Wildland Resources, University of California, Davis.
27. Kondolf, G. M., M. W. Smeltzer, and S. Railsback. Design and performance of a channel reconstruction project in a coastal California gravel-bed stream. Environmental Management. (In press.)
28. Lee, D. R., and J. A. Cherry. 1978. A field exercise on groundwater using seepage meters and mini-piezometers. Journal of Geological Education 27:6-10.
29. MacDonald, L. 1988. An inexpensive, portable system for drilling into subsurface layers. Soil Science Society of America Journal 52:1817-1819.
30. MacDonald, L., A. Smart, and R. Wissmar. 1991. Monitoring guidelines to evaluate effects of forestry activities on streams in the Pacific Northwest and Alaska. Developed for Region 10. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency with the Center for Streamside Studies, University of Washington, Seattle.
31. Malanson, G. P., and D. R. Butler. 1990. Woody debris, sediment, and riparian vegetation of a subalpine river, Montana. U.S.A. Arctic and Alpine Research 22(2):183-194.
32. Nakamura, F., and F. J. Swanson. 1993. Effects of coarse woody debris on morphology and sediment storage of a mountain stream in western Oregon. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 18:43-61.
33. National Research Council. 1992. Restoration of aquatic ecosystems: science, technology, and public policy. National Research Council Committee on Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems, Washington D. C.
34. Rantz, S. E., et al. 1982. Measurement and computation of streamflow: Volume 1. Measurement of stage and discharge. U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 2175. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D. C.
35. Reeves, G. H., F. H. Everest, and T. E. Nickelson. 1989. Identification of physical habitats limiting the production of coho salmon in western Oregon and Washington. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-245. Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, U.S. Forest Service, Portland, Oregon.
36. Reid, L. M., and T. Dunne. 1996. Rapid evaluation of sediment budgets. Cantena supplement. GeoEcology Paperbacks, Reiskirchen, Germany.
37. Reid, L. M., R. R. Zeimer, and M. J. Furniss. 1996. Watershed analysis on federal lands of the Pacific Northwest. U.S. Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station. Available on-line at: www.rsl.psw.fs.fed.us/projects/water/1WhatisWA.htm.
38. Richter, B. D., J. V. Baumgartner, J. Powell, and D. P. Braun. 1996. A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems. Conservation Biology 10:1163-1174.
39. Rosgen, D. L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22: 169-199.
40. Rosgen, D. L. 1996. Applied river morphology. Wildland Hydrology Consultants, Pagosa Springs, Colorado.
41. Sear, D. A. 1994. River restoration and geomorphology. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 4:169-177.
42. Smith, S. M. 1997. Changes in the hydraulic and morphological characteristics of a relocated stream channel. M.S. thesis. University of Maryland, College Park.
43. Stuart, T. A. 1953. Water currents through permeable gravels and their significance to spawning salmonids. Nature 172:407-408.
44. Swanson, F. J., R. J. Janda, T. Dunne, and D. N. Swanston. 1982. Sediment budgets and routing in forested drainage basins. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-141. Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, U.S. Forest Service, Portland, Oregon.
45. Terhune, L. B. D. 1958. The Mark VI groundwater standpipe for measuring seepage through salmon spawning gravel. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 15(5):1027-1063.
46. Vyverberg, K., W. Snyder, and R. G. Titus. 1997. Lower American River chinook salmon spawning habitat evaluation, October 1994. California Department of Fish and Game, Environmental Services Division, Sacramento.
47. Walters, C. 1986. Adaptive management of renewable resources. MacMillan Publishing Company, New York.
48. Wolman, M. G. 1954. A method of sampling coarse river-bed material. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 35: 951-956.