Automated distal coronary bypass with a novel magnetic coupler (MVP system)

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Volumn 127, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 185-192

  Filsoufi, F ^a   Farivar, R S ^a   Aklog, L ^a   Anderson, C A ^a   Chen, R H ^a   Lichtenstein, S ^b   Zhang, J ^b   Adams, David H ^a,c   Diegeler, Anno ^d   Walpoth, Dreat H ^d   Grundeman, Draul F ^d   Shemin, Richard J ^d   Mohr, F W ^d   Fernandez, Javier ^d   Mack, Michael J ^d  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANASTOMOSIS; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY SURGERY; DEVICE; HISTOLOGY; IMPLANT; INTERNAL MAMMARY ARTERY; MAGNETIC COUPLER; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETIC VASCULAR POSITIONING SYSTEM; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY; STERNOTOMY; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SWINE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 10744226940     PISSN: 00225223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.04.005     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Mack MJ, Magovern JA, Acuff TA, Landreneau RJ, Tennison DM, Tinnerman EJ, et al. Results of graft patency by immediate angiography in minimally invasive coronary artery surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:383-90.
2. Subramanian VA, McCabe JC, Geller CM. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting: two-year clinical experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;64:1648-55.
3. Arom KV, Flavin TF, Emery RW, Kshettry VR, Janey PA, Petersen RJ. Safety and efficacy of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:704-10.
4. Loulmet D, Carpentier A, d'Attellis N, Berrebi A, Cardon C, Ponzio O, et al. Endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting with the aid of robotic assisted instruments. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;118:4-10.
5. Shennib H, Bastawisy A, McLoughlin J, Moll F. Robotic computer-assisted telemanipulation enhances coronary artery bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;117:310-3.
6. Mohr FW, Falk V, Diegler A, Walter T, Gummert JF, Bucerius J, et al. Computer-enhanced "robotic" cardiac surgery: experience in 148 Patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;121:842-53.
7. Dullum MK, Resano FG. Xpose: a new device that provides reproducible and easy access multivessel beating heart bypass grafting. Heart Surg Forum. 2000;3(2):113-8.
8. Hart JC, Spooner TH, Pym J, Flavin TF, Edgerton JR, Mack MJ, et al. A review of 1,582 consecutive Octopus off-pump-coronary bypass patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70:1017-20.
9. Shennib H. Enter the era of facilitated anastomotic devices for coronary bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;121:833-4.
10. Solem JO, Boumzebra D, Al-Buraiki J, Nakeeb S, Rafeh W, Al-Halees Z. Evaluation of a new device for quick sutureless coronary artery anastomosis in surviving sheep. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000;17:312-8.
11. Eckstein FS, Bonilla LF, Meyer B, Berg TA, Neidhart PP, Schmidli J, et al. Sutureless mechanical anastomosis of a saphenous vein graft to a coronary artery with a new connector device. Lancet. 2001;357:931-2.
12. Nataf P, Hinchliffe P, Manzo S, Simpson J, Kirsch WM, Zhu YH, et al. Facilitated vascular anastomoses: the one-shot device. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66:1041-4.
13. Hill AC, Maroney TP, Virmani R. Facilitated coronary anastomosis using a Nitinol U-clip device: bovine model. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;121:859-70.