Relating distinctive orthographic and phonological processes to episodic memory performance

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 632-639

  Cortese, Michael J ^a   Watson, Jason M ^b   Wang, Jing ^c   Fugett, April ^d  

^a School of Business and Economics   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d MOREHEAD STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEMORY; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONETICS; RECALL; RECOGNITION; TASK PERFORMANCE; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 4644266138     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03195854     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. BERNDT, R. S., REGGIA, J. A., & MITCHUM, C. C. (1987). Empirically derived probabilities for grapheme-to-phoneme correspondences in English. Behavior Research Methods. Instruments, & Computers, 19, 1-9.
2. CLARK, H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 12, 335-339.
3. COLTHEART, M., DAVELAAR, E., JONASSON, J. T., & BESNER, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535-555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. COLTHEART, M., RASTLE, K., PERRY, C., LANGDON R., & ZIEGLER, J. (2001). A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
5. CORTESE, M. J. (1998). Revisiting serial position effects in reading. Journal of Memory & Language, 39, 652-665.
6. CORTESE, M. J., BALOTA, D. A., SERGENT-MARSHALL, S. D., & BUCKNER, R. L. (2003). Sublexical, lexical, and semantic influences in spelling: Exploring the effects of age, Alzheimer's disease and primary semantic impairment. Neuropsychologia, 41, 952-967.
7. CORTESE, M. J., & SIMPSON, G. B. (2000). Regularity effects in word naming: What are they? Memory & Cognition, 28, 1269-1276.
8. HIRSHMAN, E., & JACKSON, E. (1997). Distinctive perceptual processing memory. Journal of Memory & Language, 36, 2-12.
9. HUNT, R. R., & ELLIOTT, J. M. (1980). The role of nonsemantic information in memory: Orthographic distinctiveness effects on retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 49-74.
10. KUČERA, H., & FRANCIS, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
11. PLAUT, D. E., MCCLELLAND, J. L., SEIDENBERG, M. S., & PATTERSON, K. E. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
12. SCHMIDT, S. R. (1991). Can we have a distinctiveness theory of memory? Memory & Cognition, 19, 523-542.
13. WALLACE, W. P. (1965). Review of historical, empirical, and theoretical status of the von Restorff phenomenon. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 410-424.
14. ZECHMEISTER, E. B. (1969). Orthographic distinctiveness. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 8, 754-761.
15. ZIEGLER, J. C., STONE, G. O., & JACOBS, A. M. (1997). What is the pronunciation for -ough and the spelling for /u/? A database for computing feedforward and feedback consistency in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments. & Computers, 29, 600-618.