Conservative excision of wire-bracketed breast carcinomas: A community hospital's experience

Breast Journal

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 398-404

  Florentine, Barbara D ^a,b   Kirsch, Daniel ^a,c   Carroll Johnson, Rose Mary ^d   Senofsky, Greg ^c,e  

^a Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d Breast Cancer Resource Center   (United States)

^e Breast Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast biopsy; Breast cancer; Community hospital; Wire localization

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; BRACKETING WIRE; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST DUCTAL CARCINOMA IN SITU; CARCINOMA IN SITU; COMMUNITY HOSPITAL; CONSULTATION; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; MEDICAL RECORD; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PEROPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; TUMOR VOLUME; WIRE BRACKETING;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY; BIOPSY, FINE-NEEDLE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CALIFORNIA; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; FEMALE; HOSPITALS, COMMUNITY; HUMANS; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 4644251932     PISSN: 1075122X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2004.21371.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Morrow M, Strom EA, Bassett LW, et al. Standard for breast conservation therapy in the management of invasive breast carcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin 2002;52:277-300.
2. Morrow M, Strom EA, Bassett LW, et al. Standard for the management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast (DCIS). CA Cancer J Clin 2002;52:256-76.
3. Schnitt SJ, Abner A, Gelman R, et al. The relationship between microscopic margins of resection and the risk of local recurrence in patients with breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy. Cancer 1994;74:1746-51.
4. Silverstein MJ, Lagios MD, Groshen S, et al. The influence of margin width on local control of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1455-61.
5. Liberman L, Kaplan J, Van Zee KJ, et al. Bracketing wires for preoperative breast needle localization. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;17:565-72.
6. Hastrich DJ, Dunn JM, Armstrong JS, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of fine-wire localization biopsy for impalpable breast cancer. Br J Surg 1992;79:1038-41.
7. Chadwick DR, Shorthouse AJ. Wire-directed localization biopsy of the breast: an audit of results and analysis of factors influencing therapeutic value in the treatment of breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 1997;23:128-33.
8. Mokbel K, Ahmed M, Nash A, Sacks N. Reexcision operations in nonpalpable breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 1995;58:225-28.
9. Silverstein MJ, Gamagami P, Rosser RJ, et al. Hooked-wire-directed breast biopsy and overpenetrated mammography. Cancer 1987;59:715-22.
10. Silverstein MJ, Gamagami P, Colburn WJ. Coordinated biopsy team: surgical, pathologic, and radiologic issues. In: Silverstein MJ, ed. Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1997:333-42.
11. Tartter PI, Kaplan J, Bleiweiss I, et al. Lumpectomy margins, reexcision, and local recurrence of breast cancer. Am J Surg 2000;179:81-85.
12. Yim JH, Barton P, Weber B, et al. Mammographically detected breast cancer. Benefits of stereotactic core versus wire localization biopsy. Ann Surg 1996;223:688-700.
13. Holland R, Hendriks JH, Vebeek AL, et al. Extent, distribution, and mammographic/histological correlations of breast ductal carcinoma in situ. Lancet 1990;335:519-22.
14. Holland R, Hendriks JH. Microcalcifications associated with ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic-pathologic correlation. Semin Diagn Pathol 1994;11:181-92.