Inhibition of return in visual marking? The importance of the interstimulus interval and the type of search task

Visual Cognition

Volumn 9, Issue 7, 2002, Pages 869-888

  Pratt, Jay ^a   McAuliffe, Jim ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b LAKEHEAD UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COLOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0036799922     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506280143000449     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Abrams, R.A., & Dobkin, R.S. (1994). Inhibition of return: Effects of attentional cueing on eye movement latencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 467-477.
2. Chasteen, A.L., & Pratt, J. (1999). The effect of inhibition of return on lexical access. Psychological Science, 10, 41-46.
3. Collie, A., Maruff, P., Yucel, M., Currie, J., & Danckert, J. (2000). Spatiotemporal distribution of facilitation and inhibition of return arising from the reflexive orienting of covert attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1733-1745.
4. Danzinger, S., Kingstone, A., & Snyder, J.J. (1998). Inhibition of return to successively stimulated locations in a sequential visual search paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1467-1475.
5. Fuentes, L.J., Boucart, M., Vivas, A.B., Alvarez, R., & Zimmerman, M.A. (2000). Inhibitory tagging in inhibition of return is affected in schizophrenia: Evidence from the Stroop task. Neuropsychology, 14, 134-140.
6. Fuentes, L.J., Vivas, A.B., & Humphreys, G.W. (1999). Inhibitory tagging of stimulus properties in inhibition of return: Effects on semantic priming and flanker interference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 149-164.
7. Gibson, B.S., & Amelio, J. (2000). Inhibition of return and attentional control settings. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 496-504.
8. Kingstone, A., & Pratt, J. (1999). Inhibition of return is composed of attentional and oculomotor components. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 1046-1054.
9. Klein, R.M. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature, 334, 430-431.
10. Klein, R.M., & MacInnes, W.J. (1999). Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science, 10, 346-382.
11. Lupiáñez, J., & Milliken, B. (1999). Inhibition of return and the attentional set for integrating versus differentiating information. Journal of General Psychology, 126, 392-418.
12. Maruff, P., Yucel, M., Danckert, J., Stuart, G., & Currie, J. (1999). Facilitation and inhibition arising from the exogenous orienting of covert attention depends on the temporal properties of spatial cues and targets. Neuropsychologia, 37, 731-744.
13. Maylor, E. (1985). Facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space. In M.I. Posner & O.S.M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI: Mechanisms of attention (pp. 189-204). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
14. Müller, H., & Müchlenen, A. (2000). Probing distractor inhibition in visual search: Inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1591-1605.
15. Posner, M.I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D.G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531-556). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
16. Pratt, J. (1995). Inhibition of return in a discrimination task. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 117-120.
17. Pratt, J., Kingstone, A., & Khoe, W. (1997). Inhibition of return in location and identity based choice decision tasks. Perception and Psychophysics, 59, 964-971.
18. Pratt, J., & McAuliffe, J. (2001). The effects of onsets and offsets on visual attention. Psychological Research, 65, 185-191.
19. Pratt, J., Sekuler, A.B., & McAuliffe, J. (2001). The role of attentional set on attentional cueing and inhibition of return. Visual Cognition, 8, 33-46.
20. Pratt, J., Spalek, T., & Bradshaw, E. (1999). The time to detect targets at inhibited and non-inhibited location: Preliminary evidence for attentional momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 730-746.
21. Rafal, R.D., Calabresi, P.A., Brennan, C.W., & Sciolto, T.K. (1989). Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 673-685.
22. Rafal, R.D., Posner, M.I., Friedman, J.H., Inhoff, A.W., & Bernstein, E. (1988). Orienting of visual attention in progressive supranuclear palsy. Brain, 111, 267-280.
23. Riggio, L., Bello, A., & Umilta, C. (1998). Inhibitory and facilitatory effects of cue onset and offset. Psychological Research, 61, 104-118.
24. Sapir, A., Soroker, N., Berger, A., & Henik, A. (1999). Inhibition of return in spatial attention: Direct evidence for collicular generation. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 1053-1054.
25. Snyder, J.J., & Kingstone, A. (2000). Inhibition of return and visual search: How many separate loci are inhibited? Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 452-458.
26. Takeda, Y., & Yagi, A. (2000). Inhibitory tagging if visual search can be found in search stimuli remain visible. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 917-934.
27. Tassinari, G., & Berlucchi, G. (1993). Sensory and attentional components of slowing of manual reaction time to non-fixated visual targets by ipsilateral primes. Vision Research, 33, 1525-1534.
28. Taylor, T.L., & Klein, R.M. (1998). On the causes and effects of inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 625-643.
29. Tipper, S.P., Driver, J., & Weaver, B. (1991). Object-centered inhibition of return of visual attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 289-298.
30. Tipper, S.P., Weaver, B., Jerreat, L.M., & Burak, A.L. (1994). Object- and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 478-499.
31. Watson, D.G., & Humphreys, G.W. (1997). Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review, 104, 90-122.
32. Watson, D.G., & Humphreys, G.W. (1998). Visual marking of moving objects: A role for top-down feature-based inhibition in selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 946-962.
33. Watson, D.G., & Humphreys, G.W. (2000). Visual marking: Evidence for inhibition using a probe-dot detection paradigm. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 471-481.