Modeling school choice: A comparison of public, private-independent, private-religious and home-schooled students

Education Policy Analysis Archives

Volumn 12, Issue , 2004, Pages

  Belfield, Clive R ^a  

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4644243778     PISSN: 10682341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14507/epaa.v12n30.2004     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Bauman, K. J. (2002). Home-schooling in the United States: Trends and characteristics. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10 (26).
2. Card, D. (1999). The causal effect of education on earnings. In Ashenfelter O and D Card. (Eds). Handbook of Labor Economics Volume 3C. North-Holland: New York.
3. Evans, W. N. and Schwab, R. M. (1995). Finishing high school and starting college: do Catholic schools make a difference? Quarterly Journal of Economics, CX, 941-974.
4. Figlio, D. N. and Stone, J. A. (1999). Are private schools really better? Research in Labor Economics, 18, 115-140.
5. Friedman, M. (1993). Public schools, make them private. Education Economics, 1, 25-45.
6. Grogger, J. and Neal, D. (2000). Further evidence on the benefits of Catholic secondary schooling. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs. Brookings: Washington, D. C.
7. Hammons, C. W. (2001). School@home. Education Next, Winter, 48-55.
8. Hanushek, E. A. (1998). Conclusions and controversies about the effectiveness of schools. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review, 4, 1-22.
9. Hoxby, C. M. (2000). Does competition among public schools benefit students and tax-payers? American Economic Review, 90, 1209-1238.
10. Kenny, L. W. and Schmidt, A. B. (1994). The decline in the number of school districts in the US: 1950-1980. Public Choice, 79, 1-18.
11. Laneau, R. (2000). Home Advantage. Rowman & Littlefield: New York.
12. Lines, P. 2000. Home-schooling comes of age. The Public Interest, 140, 74-85.
13. Ludwig, J. and Ladd, H. F. and Duncan, G. J. (2001). Urban poverty and educational outcomes. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs, pp. 147-202.
14. Moe, T. M. (2001). Schools, Vouchers and the American Public. Brookings Institution: Washington.
15. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 2001. Homeschooling in the United States: 1999. http://nces.ed.gov/
16. Neal, D. (1997). The effects of Catholic secondary schooling on educational achievement. Journal of Labor Economics, 15, 98-123.
17. Rudner, L. M. (1999). Scholastic achievement and demographic characteristics of home-school students in 1998. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 7(8).
18. Sander, W. (2001). The effects of Catholic schools on religiosity, education, and competition. Occasional Paper, National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education, www.ncspe.org.
19. Smith, A. (2000). [1759]. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Prometheus Books: New York.
20. Somerville, S. 2001. Legalizing home-schooling in America. A quiet but persistent revolution. Mimeo. Home-school Legal Defense Association.
21. Stevens, M. L. (2001). Kingdom of Children. Culture and Controversy in the Home-Schooling Movement. Princeton University Press: Princeton.
22. Teske, P. and Schneider, M. (2000). What research can tell policymakers about school choice. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20, 609-631.
23. Welner, K. M. and Welner, K. (1999). Contextualising home-schooling data. A response to Rudner. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 7(13).