Nitric oxide represses the Arabidopsis floral transition

Science

Volumn 305, Issue 5692, 2004, Pages 1968-1971

  He, Yikun ^a,b   Tang, Ru Hang ^a   Hao, Yi ^a   Stevens, Robert D ^c   Cook, Charles W ^a   Ahn, Sun M ^a   Jing, Liufang ^a   Yang, Zhongguang ^c   Chen, Longen ^c   Guo, Fangqing ^d   Fiorani, Fabio ^a,e   Jackson, Robert B ^a   Crawford, Nigel M ^d   Pei, Zhen Ming ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CAPITAL NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^e GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING; GENES; MUTAGENESIS; NITROGEN OXIDES;

ENVIRONMENTAL STIMULI; FLORAL TRANSITION; GENE EXPRESSION; NITRIC OXIDES;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

NITRIC OXIDE;

ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FLOWERING; GENE EXPRESSION; INHIBITION; NITRIC OXIDE;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FLOWERING; GENE EXPRESSION; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; PLANT GENETICS; PLANT GROWTH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS PROTEINS; CARRIER PROTEINS; FLOWERS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MUTATION; NITRIC OXIDE; NITROPRUSSIDE; PHOTOPERIOD; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA;

EID: 4644227523     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1098837     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. G. G. Simpson, C. Dean, Science 296, 285 (2002).
2. A. Mouradov, F. Cremer, G. Coupland, Plant Cell 14, S111 (2002).
3. H. H. Schmidt, U. Walter, Cell 78, 919 (1994).
4. L. Lamattina, C. Garcia-Mata, M. Graziano, G. Pagnussat, Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 54, 109 (2003).
5. Y. Y. Leshem, E. Haramaty, J. Plant Physiol. 148, 258 (1996).
6. M. V. Beligni, L. Lamattina, Planta 210, 215 (2000).
7. Y. Morot-Gaudry-Talarmain et al., Planta 215, 708 (2002).
8. Y. He, Z.-M. Pei, data not shown.
9. M. Koornneef, C. J. Hanhart, J. H. van der Veen, Mol. Gen. Genet. 229, 57 (1991).
10. Information on materials and methods is available on Science Online.
11. F.-Q. Guo, M. Okamoto, N. M. Crawford, Science 302, 100 (2003).
12. M. R. Chandok, A. J. Ytterberg, K. J. van Wijk, D. F. Klessig, Cell 113, 469 (2003).
13. H. Li, K. Culligan, R. A. Dixon, J. Chory, Plant Cell 7, 1599 (1995).
14. S. J. Streatfield et al., Plant Cell 11, 1609 (1999).
15. M. A. Blazquez, L. N. Soowal, I. Lee, D. Weigel, Development 124, 3835 (1997).
16. T.-p. Sun, F. Gubler, Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 55, 197 (2004).
17. S. D. Michaels, R. M. Amasino, Plant Cell 11, 949 (1999).
18. P. Suarez-Lopez et al., Nature 410, 1116 (2001).
19. M. J. Yanovsky, S. A. Kay, Nature 419, 308 (2002).
20. K. A. Hicks et al., Science 274, 790 (1996).
21. S. Fowler et al., EMBO J. 18, 4679 (1999).
22. H. Onouchi, M. I. Igeno, C. Perilleux, K. Graves, G. Coupland, Plant Cell 12, 885 (2000).
23. C. Strayer et al., Science 289, 768 (2000).
24. Z.-Y. Wang, E. M. Tobin, Cell 93, 1207 (1998).
25. We thank S. Han for assistance; Z. Mou and W. Wang for advice concerning map-based cloning; R. Fehon for use of a fluorescence stereomicroscope; R. Amasino for the FLC clone; G. Coupland for the GI clone and 35S::CO seeds; Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center for elf3 and cue1 seeds; J. Chory, G. Coupland, J. Schroeder, X. Dong, and J. Dangl's lab for helpful discussion; and J. Siedow, T. Sun, P. Benfey, R. Fehon, P. Reeves, J. Reed, and R. Amasino for critical comments on the manuscript. Y.H. was supported by an exchange program between Duke University and Capital Normal University, Chinese NSF (30328003), and the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2002AA2Z1001), and R.-H.T. by a Hargitt Fellowship. This work was supported by NSF (MCB-0132894), start-up funds, and Arts and Sciences Research funds from Duke University to Z.-M.P.