Mirror vision: Perceived size and perceived distance of virtual images

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 66, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 679-691

  Higashiyama, Atsuki ^a   Shimono, Koichi ^b  

^a RITSUMEIKAN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b TOKYO UNIVERSITY OF MARINE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4544353491     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194911     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. ADOLFSON, J., & BERGHAGE, T. (1974). Perception and performance under water. New York: Wiley.
2. BAIRD, J. C., & WAGNER, M. (1991). Transformation theory of size judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 852-864.
3. BARAC-CIKOJA, D., & TURVEY, M. T. (1995). Does perceived size depend on perceived distance? An argument from extended haptic perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 216-224.
4. BROOTA, K. D., & EPSTEIN, W. (1973). The time it takes to make vertical size and distance judgments. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 358-364.
5. EPSTEIN, W. (1973). The process of "taking-into-account" in visual perception. Perception, 2, 267-285.
6. EPSTEIN, W. (1977). Historical introduction to constancies. In W. Epstein (Ed.), Stability and constancy in visual perception: Mechanisms and processes (pp. 1-22). New York: Wiley.
7. EPSTEIN, W., & BROOTA, K. D. (1975). Attitude of judgment and reaction time in estimation of size at a distance. Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 201-204.
8. EPSTEIN, W., & LANDAUER, A. A. (1969). Size and distance judgments under reduced conditions of viewing. Perception & Psychophysics, 6, 269-272.
9. EPSTEIN, W., PARK, J., & CASEY, A. (1961). The current status of the size-distance hypotheses. Psychological Bulletin, 58, 491-514.
10. FOLEY, J. M. (1967). Binocular disparity and perceived relative distance: An examination of two hypotheses. Vision Research, 7, 655-670.
11. FOLEY, J. M. (1968). Depth, size and distance in stereoscopic vision. Perception & Psychophysics, 3, 265-274.
12. GIBSON, J. J. (1950). The perception of the visual world. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
13. GIBSON, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
14. GOGEL, W. C. (1964). Size cue to visually perceived distance. Psychological Bulletin, 62, 217-235.
15. GOGEL, W. C. (1969). The sensing of retinal size. Vision Research, 9, 1079-1094.
16. GOGEL, W. C. (1973a). The organization of perceived space: I. Consequences of perceptual interactions. Psychologische Forschung, 36, 195-221.
17. GOGEL, W. C. (1973b). The organization of perceived space: II. Perceptual interactions. Psychologische Forschung, 36, 223-247.
18. GOGEL, W. C. (1998). An analysis of perceptions from changes in optical size. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 805-820.
19. GOGEL, W. C., & DA SILVA, J. A. (1987). Familiar size and the theory of off-sized perceptions. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 318-328.
20. GOGEL, W. C., WIST, E. R., & HARKER, G. S. (1963). A test of the invariance of the ratio of perceived size to perceived distance. American Journal of Psychology, 76, 537-553.
21. HARRIS, C. S. (1965). Perceptual adaptation to inverted, reversed, and displaced vision. Psychological Review, 72, 419-444.
22. HAYASHIBE, K. (2002). Apparent distance in actual, three-dimensional video-recorded, and virtual reality. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 95, 573-582.
23. HELD, R., & GOTTLIEB, N. (1958). A technique for studying adaptation to disarranged hand-eye coordination. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 8, 83-86.
24. HERSHENSON, M. (1992). Size-distance invariance: Kinetic invariance is different from static invariance. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 541-548.
25. HIGASHIYAMA, A. (1977). Perceived size and distance as a perceptual conflict between two processing modes. Perception & Psychophysics, 22, 206-211.
26. HIGASHIYAMA, A., ISHIKAWA, T., & TANAKA, K. (1990). Visual alleys as a function of instructions under informative and reduced conditions of viewing. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 468-476.
27. HIGASHIYAMA, A., & KITANO, S. (1991). Perceived size and distance of persons in natural outdoor settings: The effects of familiar size. Psychologia, 34, 188-199.
28. HIGASHIYAMA, A., & SHIMONO, K. (1994). How accurate is size and distance perception for very far terrestrial objects? Function and causality. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 429-442.
29. HIGASHIYAMA, A., YOKOYAMA, Y., & SHIMONO, K. (2001). Perceived distance of targets in convex mirrors. Japanese Psychological Research, 43, 13-24.
30. HUBBARD, T. L., KALL, D., & BAIRD, J. C. (1989). Imagery, memory, and size-distance invariance. Memory & Cognition, 17, 87-94.
31. KAESS, D. W. (1980). Instructions and decision times of size-constancy responses. Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 477-482.
32. KILPATRICK, F. P., & ITTELSON, W. H. (1953). The size-distance invariance hypothesis. Psychological Review, 60, 223-231.
33. LANDAUER, A. A., & EPSTEIN, W. (1969). Does retinal size have a unique correlate in perceived size? Perception & Psychophysics, 6, 273-275.
34. NORMAN, J. (1980). Direct and indirect perception of size. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 306-314.
35. ONO, H., O'REILEY, J., & HERMAN, L. (1970). Underwater distance distortion within a manual work space. Human Factors, 12, 473-480.
36. OYAMA, T. (1974). Perceived size and perceived distance in stereoscopic vision and an analysis of their causal relations. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 175-181.
37. OYAMA, T. (1977). Analysis of causal relations in the perceptual constancies. In W. Epstein (Ed.), Stability and constancy in visual perception (pp. 183-216). New York: Wiley.
38. PREDEBON, J. (1992). The role of instructions and familiar size in absolute judgments of size and distance. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 344-354.
39. ROCK, I. (1966). The nature of perceptual adaptation. New York: Basic Books.
40. ROCK, I. (1975). An introduction to perception. New York: Macmillan.
41. ROCK, I. (1984). Perception. New York: Scientific American Books.
42. ROCK, I., & EBENHOLTZ, S. (1959). The relational determination of perceived size. Psychological Review, 66, 387-401.
43. ROSS, H. E. (1968). Water, fog and the size-distance invariance hypothesis. British Journal of Psychology, 58, 301-313.
44. ROSS, H. E., & REJMAN, M. H. (1972). Adaptation to speed distortions under water. British Journal of Psychology, 63, 257-264.
45. SEDGWICK, H. A. (1986). Space perception. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. 1, pp. 21-1 to 21-57). New York: Wiley.
46. TEGHTSOONIAN, M. (1970). The effects of size and distance on magnitude estimations of apparent size. American Journal of Psychology, 83, 601-612.
47. TEGHTSOONIAN, M. (1974). The doubtful phenomenon of over-constancy. In H. R. Moskowitz, B. Scharf, & J. C. Stevens (Eds.), Sensation and measurement: Papers in honor of S. S. Stevens (pp. 411-420). Dordorecht: Reidel.
48. VAN DER MEER, H. C. (1979). Interrelation of the effects of binocular disparity and perspective cues on judgments of depth and height. Perception & Psychophysics, 26, 481-488.
49. VERNOY, M. W. (1989). Simultaneous adaptation to size, distance, and curvature underwater. Human Factors, 31, 77-85.
50. VERNOY, M. W., & LURIA, S. M. (1977). Perception of, and adaptation to, a three-dimensional curvature distortion. Perception & Psychophysics, 22, 245-248.
51. VOGEL J. M., & TEGHTSOONIAN, M. (1972). The effects of perspective alterations on apparent size and distance scales. Perception & Psychophysics, 11, 294-298.
52. WALLACH, H., & ZUCKERMAN, C. (1963). The constancy of stereoscopic depth. American Journal of Psychology, 76, 404-412.
53. WIEST, W. M., & BELL, B. (1985). Stevens's exponent for psychophysical scaling of perceived, remembered, and inferred distance. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 457-470.