Responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences after cholecystectomy: GIQLI versus SF-36

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Volumn 12, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 1275-1282

  Shi, Hon Yi ^a   Lee, Hao Hsien ^b   Chiu, Chong Chi ^b   Chiu, Herng Chia ^a   Uen, Yih Huei ^b   Lee, King Teh ^a,c  

^a KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b CHI MEI MEDICAL CENTER   (Taiwan)

^c KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

GIQLI; Minimal clinically important differences; Responsiveness; SF 36

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; TAIWAN; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; TAIWAN; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 46249106024     PISSN: 1091255X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11605-008-0526-7     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Sanders G, Kingsnorth AN. Gallstones. BMJ 2007;335:295-299. DOI 10.1136/bmj.39267.452257.AD.
2. Livingston EH, Miller JA, Coan B, Rege RV. Costs and utilization of intraoperative cholangiography. J Gastrointest Surg 2007;11(9):1162-1167. DOI 10.1007/s11605-007-0209-9.
3. de Reuver PR, Sprangers MA, Gouma DJ. Quality of life in bile duct injury patients. Ann Surg 2007;246:161-163. DOI 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318070cble.
4. Gurusamy K, Junnarkar S, Farouk M, Davidson BR. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the safety and effectiveness of day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2008;95(2):161-168. DOI 10.1002/bjs.6105.
5. Quintana JM, Cabriada J, Aróstegui I, Oribe V, Perdigo L, Varona M et al. Health-related quality of life and appropriateness of cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 2005;241:110-118.
6. Fryback DG, Dunham NC, Palta M, Hanmer J, Buechner J, Cherepanov D et al. US norms for six generic health-related quality-of-life indexes from the national health measurement study. Med Care 2007;45:1162-1170.
7. Escobar A, Quintana JM, Bilbao A, Aróstegui I, Lafuente I, Vidaurreta I. Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacement. Osteoarthr Cartil 2007;15:273-280. DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.02.007.
8. Turner D, Otley AR, Mack D, Hyams J, de Bruijne J, Uusoue K et al. Development, validation, and evaluation of a pediatric ulcerative colitis activity index: a prospective multicenter study. Gastroenterology 2007;133:423-432. DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.05.029.
9. Schmitt JS, Di Fabio RP. Reliable change and minimum important difference (MID) proportions facilitated group responsiveness comparisons using individual threshold criteria. J Clin Epidemiol 2004;57:1008-1018. DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.02.007.
10. Huang IC, Wu AW, Frangakis C. Do the SF-36 and WHOQOL-BREF measure the same constructs? Evidence from the Taiwan population. Qual Life Res 2006;15:15-24. DOI 10.1007/s11136-005-8486-9.
11. Yeung SM, Shiu AT, Martin CR, Chu KM. Translation and validation of the Chinese version of the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index in patients with gastric tumor. J Psychosom Res 2006;61:469-477. DOI 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006. 03.049.
12. Tang B, Cuschieri A. Conversions during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: risk factors and effects on patient outcome. J Gastrointest Surg 2006;10(7):1081-1097. DOI 10:1016/j.gassur.2005.12.001.
13. Giger UF, Michel JM, Opitz I, Th Inderbitzin D, Kocher T, Krähenbühl L. Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery (SALTS) Study Group. Risk factors for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 22,953 consecutive cases from the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery database. J Am Coll Surg 2006;203(5):723-728. DOI 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.07. 018.
14. Terwee CB, Dekker FW, Wiersinga WM, Prummel MF, Bossuyt PM. On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation. Qual Life Res 2003;12:349-362. DOI 10.1023/A: 1023499322593.
15. Simon R, Maitournam A. Evaluating the efficiency of targeted designs for randomized clinical trials. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:6759-6763. DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0496.
16. Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 1989;10:407-415. DOI 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90005-6.
17. Tsong Y, Shen M. An alternative approach to assess exchangeability of a test treatment and the standard treatment with normally distributed response. J Biopharm Stat 2007;17:329-338. DOI 10.1080/10543400601177301.
18. Chang E, Abrahamowicz M, Ferland D, Fortin PR, CaNIOS Investigators. Comparison of the responsiveness of lupus disease activity measures to changes in systemic lupus erythematosus activity relevant to patients and physicians. J Clin Epidemiol 2002;55:488-497. DOI 10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00509-1.
19. Wyrwich KW, Tierney WM, Wolinsky FD. Further evidence supporting an SEM-based criterion for identifying meaningful intra-individual changes in health-related quality of life. J Clin Epidemiol 1999;52:861-873. DOI 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00071-2.
20. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. New York: Academic, 1977.
21. Zou GY. Quantifying responsiveness of quality of life measures without an external criterion. Qual Life Res 2005;14:1545-1552. DOI 10.1007/s11136-004- 0027-4.
22. Pichel F, Zamarrón C, Magán F et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: effects of long-term positive airway pressure treatment. Respir Med 2004;98:968-976.
23. Wells G, Li T, Maxwell L, MacLean R, Tugwell P. Determining the minimal clinically important differences in activity, fatigue, and sleep quality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2007;34:280-289.
24. Rabeneck L, Davila JA, Thompson M, El-Serag HB. Surgical volume and long-term survival following surgery for colorectal cancer in the Veterans Affairs Health-Care System. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:668-675. DOI 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.04135.x.
25. Solomon DH, Losina E, Baron JA, Fossel AH, Guadagnoli E, Lingard EA et al. Contribution of hospital characteristics to the volume-outcome relationship: Dislocation and infection following total hip replacement surgery. Arthritis Rheum 2002;46:2436-2444. DOI 10.1002/art.10478.
26. rossman D, Morris CB, Hu Y, Toner BB, Diamant N, Whitehead WE et al. Characterization of health related quality of life (HRQOL) for patients with functional bowel disorder (FBD) and its response to treatment. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:1442-1453. DOI 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01283.x.
27. Finan KR, Leeth RR, Whitley BM, Klapow JC, Hawn MT. Improvement in gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life after cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 2006;192:196-202. DOI 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.01.020.
28. Quintana JM, Cabriada J, López de Tejada I, Varona M, Oribe V, Barrios B, Perdigo L, Bilbao A. Translation and validation of the gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI). Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2001;93:693-706.