Costs and utilization of intraoperative cholangiography

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Volumn 11, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 1162-1167

  Livingston, Edward H ^a,b,c   Miller, Jordan A G ^a,b   Coan, Brian ^a,b   Rege, Robert V ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b VA NORTH TEXAS HEALTH CARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Choledocholithiasis; Comorbidity; Cost effectiveness analysis; Intraoperative cholangiography; National inpatient survey

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CHOLELITHIASIS; COMMON BILE DUCT; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST OF ILLNESS; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; GALLBLADDER DISEASE; HEALTH CARE COST; HOSPITAL CHARGE; HUMAN; INJURY; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADULT; CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; CHOLELITHIASIS; COMMON BILE DUCT; COST OF ILLNESS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GALLBLADDER DISEASES; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HOSPITAL CHARGES; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34548125775     PISSN: 1091255X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11605-007-0209-9     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Livingston EH. Intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common bile duct injury. JAMA 2003;290:459-460.
2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. HCUP nationwide inpatient sample: Design of the HCUP nationwide inpatient sample. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2003.
3. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373-383.
4. Romano PS, Roos LL, Jollis JG. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: differing perspectives. J Clin Epidemiol 1993;46:1075-1079.
5. Flum DR, Flowers C, Veenstra DL. A cost-effectiveness analysis of intraoperative cholangiography in the prevention of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2003;196:385-393.
6. Fletcher DR. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Australia-Outcomes and costs. Surg Endosc 1995;9:1230-1235.
7. Traverso LW, Roush TS, Koo K. CBD stones-outcomes and costs. Laparoscopic transcystic techniques other than choledochoscopy. Surg Endosc 1995;9:1242-1244.
8. Flowers JL, Zucker KA, Graham SM, Scovill WA, Imbembo AL, Bailey RW. Laparoscopic cholangiography. Results and indications. Ann Surg 1992;215:209-216.
9. Podnos YD, Gelfand DV, Dulkanchainun TS, Wilson SE, Cao S, Ji P, Ortiz JA, Imagawa DK. Is intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy cost effective? Am J Surg 2001;182:663-669.
10. Ladocsi LT, Benitez LD, Filippone DR, Nance FC. Intraoperative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A review of 734 consecutive cases. Am Surg 1997;63:150-156.
11. Phillips EH. Routine versus selective intraoperative cholangiography. Am J Surg 1993;165:505-507.
12. Soper NJ, Dunnegan DL. Routine versus selective intra-operative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 1992;16:1133-1140.
13. Flum DR, Koepsell T, Heagerty P, Sinanan M, Dellinger EP. Common bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the use of intraoperative cholangiography: Adverse outcome or preventable error? Arch Surg 2001;136:1287-1292.
14. Berci G. Static cholangiography vs digital fluoroscopy. Intraoperative cholangiography: Benefit and cost ratio. Surg Endosc 1995;9:1244-1248.