Sensitivity analysis for selective constraint and variability tuning in performance assessment of industrial MPC

Control Engineering Practice

Volumn 16, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1195-1215

  Lee, Kwan Ho ^a   Huang, Biao ^a   Tamayo, Edgar C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b SYNCRUDE CANADA LTD   (Canada)

Author keywords

Constraint tuning; Convex optimization; Economic performance assessment; Model predictive control; Sensitivity analysis; Variability tuning

Indexed keywords

AEROSPACE APPLICATIONS; CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; INTEGER PROGRAMMING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MODAL ANALYSIS; MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL; MULTITASKING; PAPER; PREDICTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS; TUNING; VARIATIONAL TECHNIQUES;

(PL) PROPERTIES; ECONOMIC PERFORMANCES; ELSEVIER (CO); INDUSTRIAL CASE STUDIES; MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL (MPC); OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHMS; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT (PA); PROCESS VARIABLES (PV); SELECTIVE TUNING (ST);

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 46149119172     PISSN: 09670661     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2008.01.007     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Al-Shammari, A. A., & Forbes, F. J. (2007). Post-optimality analysis of steady-state linear target calculation in model predictive control. In Proceedings of the 8th international IFAC symposium on dynamics and control of process systems (pp. 51-56), Cancun, Mexico.
2. Bauer M., and Craig I.K. Economic assessment of advanced process control-a survey and framework. Journal of Process Control 18 1 (2008) 2-18
3. Camacho E.F., and Bordons C. Model predictive control (1998), Springer, Berlin
4. Choudhury M.A.A.S., Shah S.L., Thornhill N.F., and Shook D.S. Automatic detection and quantification of stiction in control valves. Control Engineering Practice 14 12 (2006) 1395-1412
5. Coleman T., Branch M., and Grace A. Optimization toolbox for use with matlab (1999), The Mathworks Parter Series, Natick, MA
6. Figueroa J.L., Bahri P.A., Bandoni J.A., and Romagnoli J.A. Economic impact of disturbances and uncertain parameters in chemical processes-a dynamic back-off analysis. Computers Chemical Engineering 20 4 (1996) 453-461
7. Gahinet P., Nemirovski A., Laub A.J., and Chilali M. LMI control toolbox for use with matlab (1995), The Mathworks Parter Series, Natick, MA
8. Harris T.J. Assessment of control loop performance. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 67 (1989) 856-861
9. Harris T.J., Boudreau F., and Macgregor J.F. Performance assessment of multivariable feedback controllers. Automatica 32 11 (1996) 1505-1518
10. Huang B., and Shah S.L. Performance assessment of control loops: Theory and applications (1999), Spring, London
11. Huang B., Shah S.L., and Kwok E.K. Good, bad or optimal? Performance assessment of multivariable processes. Automatica 33 6 (1997) 1175-1183
12. Jelali M. An overview of control performance assessment technology and industrial applications. Control Engineering Practice 14 5 (2006) 441-466
13. Kassmann D.E., Badgwell T.A., and Hawkins R.B. Robust steady-state target calculation for model predictive control. AIChE Journal 46 5 (2000) 1007-1024
14. Krishnan, A., Kosanovich, K. A., DeWitt, M. R., & Creech, M. B. (1998). Robust model predictive control of an industrial solid phase polymerizer. In Proceedings of the American control conference (pp. 3386-3390), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
15. Kwon W.H., and Han S. Receding horizon control: Model predictive control for state models (2005), Springer, London, UK
16. Latour P.L., Sharpe J.H., and Delaney M.C. Estimating benefits from advanced control. ISA Transactions 25 4 (1986) 13-21
17. Lear J.B., Barton G.W., and Perkins J.D. Interaction between process design and process control: The impact of disturbances and uncertainty on estimates of achievable economic performance. Journal of Process Control 5 1 (1995) 49-62
18. Loeblein C., and Perkins J.D. Economic analysis of different structures of on-line process optimization systems. Computers Chemical Engineering 22 9 (1998) 1257-1269
19. Loeblein C., and Perkins J.D. Structural design for on-line process optimization: I. Dynamic economics of MPC. Computers Chemical Engineering 45 5 (1999) 1018-1029
20. Maciejowski J.M. Predictive control with constraints (2002), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
21. Martin, G. D., Turpin, L. E., & Cline, R. P. (1991). Estimating control function benefits. Hydrocarbon Processing 68-73.
22. Morari M., and Lee J.H. Model predictive control: Past, present and future. Computers and Chemical Engineering 23 (1999) 667-682
23. Muske K.R. Estimating the economic benefit from improved process control. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 42 (2003) 4535-4544
24. Qin S.J., and Badgwell T.A. A survey of industrial model predictive control technology. Control Engineering Practice 11 (2003) 733-764
25. Rawlings J.B. Tutorial overview of model predictive control. IEEE Control Systems Magazine 20 (2000) 38-52
26. Salsbury T.I. Continuous-time model identification for closed loop control performance assessment. Control Engineering Practice 15 1 (2007) 109-121
27. Seferlis P., and Grievink J. Process design and control structure screening based on economic and static controllability criteria. Computers Chemical Engineering 25 (2001) 177-188
28. Sorensen R.C., and Cutler C.R. LP integrates economics into dynamic matrix control. Hydrocarbon Processing 77 9 (1998) 57-65
29. Srinivasan R., Rengaswamy R., and Miller R. A modified empirical mode decomposition (EMD) process for oscillation characterization in control loops. Control Engineering Practice 15 9 (2007) 1135-1148
30. Sturm J.F. Using SeDuMi 1.02, a Malab toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones. Optimization Methods and Software 11-12 (1999) 625-653
31. Vandenberghe L., and Boyd S. Semidefinite programming. SIAM Review 38 1 (1996) 49-95
32. Xu F., Huang B., and Akande S. Performance assessment of model predictive control for variability and constraint tuning. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 46 (2007) 1208-1219
33. Xu F., Lee K.H., and Huang B. Monitoring control performance via structured closed-loop response subject to output variance/covariance upper bound. Journal of Process Control 16 (2006) 971-984