Estimating operational benefits of aircraft navigation and air traffic control procedures using an integrated aviation modeling and evaluation platform

Proceedings - Winter Simulation Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1569-1577

  Mayer, Ralf H ^a  

^a MITRE CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE DATA PROCESSING; AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL; AIR TRANSPORTATION; AIRCRAFT; AIRPORT BUILDINGS; AIRPORTS; AVIATION; CONTROL TOWERS; FINANCIAL DATA PROCESSING; MONTE CARLO METHODS;

AGENT-BASED; AIR TRAFFIC (CO); AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL (ATC); AIRCRAFT FLIGHTS; AIRCRAFT NAVIGATION; BASELINE MODELS; CONTROL PROCEDURES; DATA DRIVEN (DD); EVALUATION PLATFORMS; INHERENT VARIABILITY; MODEL VALIDATIONS; MODELING PLATFORMS; MODELING SYSTEMS; MONTE CARLO APPROACH; MONTE CARLO MODELING; OPERATING PROCEDURES; OPERATIONAL BENEFITS; OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS; PERFORMANCE METRICS; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS; VALIDATION APPROACHES;

AIR NAVIGATION;

EID: 46149116597     PISSN: 08917736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WSC.2006.322928     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Eurocontrol. 2004. Base of Aircraft Data (BADA 3.5), The EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre, Brétigny, France.
2. FAA. 2006. Federal Aviation Administration Order 7110.65R, Air Traffic Control, Washington, D.C.
3. Henriksen, James O. 1998. Stretching the boundaries of simulation software. In Proceedings of the 1998 Winter Simulation Conference, ed. Medeiros, D.J., E. Watson, M.S. Manivannan, and J. Carson, 227-234. Piscataway, New Jersey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
4. Lisker-Melmar, Dr. Bernardo, et al. 2000. Future Airport Development for Mexico City, Studies of Technical Feasibility, MTR 00W0000090, The MITRE Corporation, McLean, VA.
5. Mayer, Ralf H., 2003, A Flight Trajectory Model for a PC-Based Airspace Analysis Tool, In Conference Proceedings of the AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference and Exhibit, Austin, TX.
6. th Digital Avionics Systems Conference, Washington, DC
7. th Digital Avionics Systems Conference, Washington, DC.
8. OEP. 2006. Federal Aviation Administration, Federal Aviation Administration National Airspace System Operational Evolution Plan, Version 7.1, Washington, D.C
9. TAAM. 2006. Total Airport and Airspace Modeller, Preston Aviation Solutions, Pty Ltd, Richmond, Australia
10. Wolverine. 2006. Wolverine Software Corporation, Alexandria, VA