Comparison of the acoustic and neural distortion product at 2f1-f2 in normal-hearing adults

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 47, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 431-438

  Elsisy, Hala ^a   Krishnan, Ananthanarayan ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochlear nonlinearity; Distortion product otoacoustic emissions; Frequency following response distortion products; Neural phase locking

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BLOOD FLOW; BODY MOVEMENT; BREATHING; COCHLEA; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FOURIER TRANSFORMATION; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; JAW MOVEMENT; LOW FREQUENCY NOISE; NOISE REDUCTION; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUDIOMETRY, EVOKED RESPONSE; COCHLEAR NERVE; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; FOURIER ANALYSIS; HUMANS; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; REFERENCE VALUES;

EID: 46049120247     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14992020801987396     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Abdala, C., Sininger, Y., Ekelid, M. & Zeng, F.G. 1996. Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in human adults and neonates. Hear Res, 98, 38-53.
2. Bhagat, S.P. & Champlin, C.A. 2004. Evaluation of distortion products produced by the human auditory system. Hear Res, 193, 51-67.
3. Ballachanda, B.B. & Moushegian, G. 2000. Frequency-following response: Effects of interaural time and differences. J Am Acad Audiol, 11, 1-11.
4. Batra, R., Kuwada, S. & Maher, V.L. 1986. The frequency-following response to continuous tones in humans. Hear Res, 21, 167-177.
5. Brown, A.M., Harris, F.P. & Beveridge, H.A. 1996. Two sources of acoustic distortion products from the human cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am, 100, 3260-3267.
6. Chertoff, M.E. & Hecox, K.E. 1990. Auditory nonlinearities measured with auditory- evoked potentials. J Acoust Soc Am, 87, 1248-1254.
7. Chertoff, M.E., Hecox, K.E. & Goldstein, R. 1992. Auditory distortion products measured with averaged auditory evoked potentials. J Speech & Hear Res, 35, 157-166.
8. Clark, J.L., Moushegian, G. & Rupert, A.L. 1997. Interaural time effects on the frequency-following response. J Am Acad Audiol, 8, 308-313.
9. Dhar, S., Long, G.R. & Culpepper, N.B. 1998. The dependence of distortion product 2f1-f2 on primary levels in non-impaired human ears. J Sp Lan Hear Res, 41, 1307-1318.
10. Furst, M., Rabinowitz, W. & Zurek, P.M. 1988. Ear canal otoacoustic distortion at 2f1-f2 from human ears: Relation to other emissions and perceived combination tones. J Acoust Soc Am, 84, 215-222.
11. Galbraith, G.C. 1994. Two-channel brain-stem frequency-following responses to pure-tone and missing fundamental stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 92, 321-330.
12. Galbraith, G.C., Bhuta, S.M., Choate, A.K., Kitahara, J.M. & Mullen, T.A. Jr. 1998. Brainstem frequency following response to dichotic vowels during attention. Neuroreport, 9, 1889-1893.
13. Galbraith, G.C., Jhaveri, S.P. & Kuo, J. 1997. Speech-evoked brainstem frequency-following responses during verbal transformations due to word repetition. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 102, 46-53.
14. Gaskill, S.A. & Brown, A.M. 1990. The behavior of the acoustic distortion product, 2f1-f2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity. J Acoust Soc Am, 88, 821-839.
15. Gerken, G.M., Moushegian, G., Stillman, R.D. & Rupert, A.L. 1975. Human frequency-following responses to monaural and binaural stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 38, 379-386.
16. Goldstein, J.L. 1967. Auditory nonlinearity. J Acoust Soc Am, 41, 676-689.
17. Goldstein, J.L. & Kiang, N.Y.S. 1968. Neural correlates of the aural combination tones 2f1-f2. Proceedings of the IEEE, 56(6), 981-992.
18. Gorga, M., Neely, S., Ohlrich, B., Hoover, B., Redner, J., et al. 1997. From laboratory to clinic: A large scale study of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in ears with normal hearing and ears with hearing loss. Ear Hear, 18, 440-455.
19. Greenberg, S., Marsh, J.T., Brown, W.S. & Smith, J.C. 1987. Neural temporal coding of low pitch. I. Human frequency-following responses to complex tones. Hear Res, 25, 91-114.
20. Harris, F.P., Lonsbury-Martin, B.L., Stagner, B.B., Coats, A.C. & Martin, G.K. 1989. Acoustic distortion products in humans: Systematic changes in amplitude as a function of f2/f1 ratio. J Acoust Soc Am, 85, 220-229.
21. Hoormann, J., Falkenstein, M., Hohnsbein, J. & Blanke, L. 1992. The human frequency-following response (FFR): Normal variability and relation to the click-evoked brainstem response. Hear Res, 59, 179-188.
22. Kemp, D.T. 1979. Evidence of mechanical nonlinearity and frequency selective wave amplification in the cochlea. Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 224, 47-54.
23. Kemp, D.T. & Brown, A.M. 1984. Ear canal acoustic and round window electrical correlates of 2f1-f2 distortion product generated in the cochlea. Hear Res, 13, 39-46.
24. Kim, D.O. 1980. Cochlear mechanics: Implications of electrophysiological and acoustical observations. Hear Res, 2, 297-317.
25. Kim, D.O., Molnar, C.E. & Matthews, J.W. 1980. Cochlear mechanics: Nonlinear behavior in two-tone responses as reflected in cochlear-nerve-fiber responses and in ear-canal sound pressure. J Acoust Soc Am, 67, 1704-1721.
26. Krishnan, A. 1999. Human frequency-following responses to two-tone approximation of steady-state vowels. J Audiol Neurootol, 4, 95-103.
27. Krishnan, A. 2002. Human frequency-following responses: representation of steady state vowels. Hear Res, 166, 192-201.
28. Krishnan, A. & McDaniel, S.S. 1998. Binaural interaction in the human frequency-following response: Effects of interaural intensity difference. Audiol Neurootol, 3, 291-299.
29. Krishnan, A. & Parkinsons, J. 2000. Human frequency-following response: Representation of tonal sweeps. J Audiol Neurootol, 5, 312-321.
30. Krishnan, A., Xu, Y., Gandour, J. & Cariani, P. 2004. Human frequency-following response: Representation of pitch contours in Chinese tones. Hear Res, 189, 1-12.
31. Krishnan, A., Xu, Y., Gandour, J. & Cariani, P. 2005. Encoding of pitch in the human brainstem is influenced by language experience. Cog Br Res, 25, 161-168.
32. Kummer, P., Janssen, T. & Arnold, W. 1995. Suppression tuning characteristics of the 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission in humans. J Acoust Soc Am, 98, 197-210.
33. Levi, E.C., Folsom, R.C. & Dobie, R.A. 1995. Coherence analysis of envelope-following responses (EFRs) and frequency-following responses (FFRs) in infants and adults. Hear Res, 89, 21-27.
34. Lonsbury-Martin, B.L., Harris, F.P., Stagner, B.B., Hawkins, M.D. & Martin, G.K. 1990. Distortion product emissions in human. I. Basic properties in normally-hearing subjects. Annals Otol Rhinol Laryngol, suppl, 99, 3-14.
35. Lonsbury-Martin, B.L. & Martin, G.K. 1990. The clinical utility of distortion -product otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear, 11(2), 144-154.
36. Lonsbury-Martin, B.L., Martin, G.K., Probst, R. & Coats, A.C. 1987. Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal. I. Basic features and physiological vulnerability. Hear Res, 28, 173-189.
37. Lonsbury-Martin, B.L., Martin, G.K. & Whitehead, M.L. 1997. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions. InM.S. Robinette & T.J. Glattke (eds.) Otoacoustic Emissions: Clinical Applications. New York: Thieme, pp. 83-109.
38. Martin, G.K., Lonsbury-Martin, B.L., Probst, R., Scheinin, S.A. & Coats, A.C. 1987. Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal. II. Sites of origin revealed by suppression contours and pure tone exposures. Hear Res, 28, 191-208.
39. Martin, G.K., Probst, R. & Lonsbury-Martin, B.L. 1990. Otoacoustic emissions in human ears: Normative findings. Ear Hear, 11, 106-120.
40. Møller, A.R. & Jho, H.D. 1989. Responses from the exposed intracranial human auditory nerve to low-frequency tones: Basic characteristics. Hear Res, 38, 163-175.
41. Moushegian, G., Rupert, A.L. & Stillman, R.D. 1973. Scalp recorded early responses in man to frequencies in the speech range. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 35, 665-667.
42. Moushegian, G., Rupert, A.L. & Stillman, R.D. 1978. Evaluation of frequency-following potentials in man: Masking and clinical studies. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 45, 711-718.
43. Nelson, D. & Kimberley, B. 1992. Distortion-product emissions and auditory sensitivity in human ears with normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss. J Speech & Hear Res, 35, 1142-1159.
44. Pandya, P.K. & Krishnan, A. 2004. Human frequency-following response correlates of the distortion product at 2f1-f2. J Am Acad Audiol, 15, 184-197.
45. Plyler, P.N. & Ananthanarayan, A.K. 2001. Human frequency-following responses: Representation of second formant transitions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Am Acad Audiol, 12, 523-533.
46. Popelka, G.R., Osterhammel, P.A., Nielsen, L.H. & Rasmussen, A. 1993. Growth of distortion product otoacoustic emissions with primary-tone level in humans. Hear Res, 71, 12-22.
47. Probst, R., Antonelli, C. & Pieren, C. 1990. Methods and preliminary results of measurements of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal and pathological ears. Adv Audiol, 7(12), 117-125.
48. Rhode, W.S. & Cooper, N.P. 1993. Two tone suppression and distortion production on the basilar membrane in the hook region of cat and guinea pig cochleae. Hear Res, 66, 31-45.
49. Rickman, M.D., Chertoff, M.E. & Hecox, K.E. 1991. Electrophysiological evidence of nonlinear distortion products to two-tone stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am, 89, 2818-2826.
50. Robel, S.L., Ruggero, M.A. & Rich, N.C. 1997. Two-tone distortion on the basilar membrane of the chinchilla cochlea. J Neurophysiol, 77, 2385-2399.
51. Robertson, D. & Johnstone, B.M. 1981. Primary auditory neurons: Nonlinear responses altered without changes in sharp tuning. J Acoust Soc Am, 69, 1096-1098.
52. Salvi, R., Perry, J., Hamernik, R.P. & Henderson, D. 1982. Relationships between cochlear pathologies and auditory nerve and behavioral responses following acoustic trauma. In R.P. Hamernik, D. Henderson & R. Salvi (eds.) New Perspectives on Noise Induced Hearing Loss. New York: Raven, pp. 165-188.
53. Sladen, D., Lamb, M. & Hall, J.W. 1996. Intra- and inter-subject variance for distortion product otoacoustic emission amplitudes. Paper presented at the American Academy of Audiology. Utah: Salt Lake City.
54. Smith, J.C., Marsh, J.T. & Brown, W.S. 1975. Far-field recorded frequency-following responses: Evidence for the locus of brainstem sources. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 39, 465-472.
55. Sohmer, H., Pratt, H. & Kinart, R. 1977. Sources of frequency following response (FFR) in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 42, 656-664.
56. Stillman, R.D., Crow, G. & Moushegian, G. 1978. Components of the frequency-following potential in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 44, 438-446.
57. Stillman, R.D., Moushegian, G. & Rupert, A.L. 1976. Early tone-evoked responses in normal- and hearing-impaired subjects. Audiology, 15, 10-22.
58. Talmadge, C.L, Long, G.R., Tubis, A. & Dhar, S. 1999. Experimental confirmation of the two-source interference model for the fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am, 105(1), 275-283.
59. Talmadge, C.L., Tubis, A., Long, G.R. & Piskorski, P. 1998. Modeling of otoacoustic emissions and hearing threshold fine structures. J Acoust Soc Am, 104, 1517-1528.
60. Talmadge, C.L., Tubis, A., Piskorski, P. & Long, G.R. 1997. Modeling of otoacoustic emission fine structure. In E.R. Lewis, G.R. Long, R.F. Lyon, P.M. Narins, C.R. Steele & E. Hecht-Poinar (eds.) Diversity in Auditory Mechanics. New Jersey: World Scientific, pp. 462-471.
61. Worden, F.G. & Marsh, J.T. 1968. Frequency-following (microphonic-like) neural responses evoked by sounds. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 25, 42-52.
62. Whitehead, M.L., Lonsbury-Martin, B.L. & Martin, G.K. 1992a. Evidence of two sources of 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions in rabbit: I. Differential dependence on stimulus parameters. J Acoust Soc Am, 91, 1587-1607.
63. Whitehead, M.L., Lonsbury-Martin, B.L. & Martin, G.K. 1992b. Evidence of two sources of 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions in rabbit: II. Differential physiological vulnerability. J Acoust Soc Am, 92, 2662-2682.