The dependence of the distortion product 2f1 - f2 on primary levels in non-impaired human ears

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Volumn 41, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 1307-1318

  Dhar, Sumit ^a   Long, Glenis R ^a   Culpepper, N Brandt ^b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

DPOAEs; Otoacoustic emissions; Power subtraction; Primary levels

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY SYSTEM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FEMALE; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MALE; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; SEX DIFFERENCE; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

EID: 0031699358     PISSN: 10924388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4106.1307     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. American National Standards Institute. (1996). Specifications for audiometers (ANSI S3.6-1996). New York: Author.
2. 1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 3726-3740.
3. Boege, P., Janssen, T. H., Kummer, P., & Arnold, W. (February 1998). Estimation of pure tone threshold from extrapolated DPOAE I/O-function. Poster presented at the twentieth mid-winter meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, St. Petersburg, FL.
4. 2 stimulated acoustic emissions in gerbil and man. Hearing Research, 13, 29-37.
5. Engdahl, B., & Kemp, D. T. (1996). The effect of noise exposure on the details of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 1573-1587.
6. 2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 821-839.
7. Harris, F. P., Glattke, T. J. (1992). The use of suppression to determine the characteristics of otoacoustic emissions. Seminars in Hearing, 13, 67-80.
8. 1 ratio. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 220-229.
9. 2 in normal human ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 280-286.
10. Helle, R. (1969). Amplitude und phase des im Gehor gebildeten Differenzton dritter Ordnung. Acustica, 22, 74-87.
11. Kemp, D. T. (1978). Stimulated acoustic stimulation from within the human auditory system. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64, 1386-1391.
12. Kemp, D. T. (1986). Otoacoustic emissions, traveling waves, and cochlear mechanisms. Hearing Research, 22, 95-104.
13. Kemp, D. T., & Brown, A. M. (1983). A comparison of mechanical nonlinearities in the cochleae of man and gerbil from ear canal measurements. In R. Klinke & R. Hartmann (Eds.), Hearing: Physiological basis and psychophysics (pp. 82-88). Berlin: Springer.
14. Kimberley, B. P., Hernadi, I., Lee, A. M., & Brown, D. K. (1994). Predicting pure tone thresholds in normal and hearing-impaired ears with distortion product emission and age. Ear and Hearing, 15, 199-209.
15. 2 distortion product otoacoustic emission in humans. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98, 197-210.
16. 2 distortion product otoacoustic emission. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 3572-3584.
17. Lonsbury-Martin, B. L., Martin, G. K., & Whitehead, M. L. (1997). Distortion product otoacoustic emissions. In M. S. Robinette & T. J. Glattke (Eds.), Otoacoustic Emissions: Clinical Applications (pp. 83-109). New York: Thieme.
18. Nielsen, L. H., Popelka, G. R., Rasmussen, A. N., & Osterhammel, P.A. (1993). Clinical significance of probe-tone frequency ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Scandinavian Audiology, 22, 159-164.
19. Nelson, D. A., & Zhou, J. Z. (1996). Slopes of distortion-product otoacoustic emission growth curves corrected for noise-floor levels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 468-474.
20. Plomp, R. (1976). Aspects of tone sensation. London: Academic Press.
21. Popelka, G. R., Osterhammel, P. A., Nielsen, L. H., & Rasmussen, A. N. (1993). Growth of distortion product otoacoustic emissions with primary level in humans. Hearing Research, 71, 12-22.
22. Probst, R., & Hauser, R. (1990). Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal and hearing impaired ears. American Journal of Otolaryngology, 11, 236-243.
23. Rasmussen, A. N., Popelka, G. R., Osterhammel, P. A., & Nielsen, L. H. (1993). Clinical significance of relative probe-tone levels on distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Scandinavian Audiology, 22(4), 159-164.
24. Rao, A., Long, G., Narayan, S., Dhar, S. (February 1995). Changes in the temporal characteristics of TEOAE and the fine structure of DPOAEs with aspirin consumption. Poster presented at the eighteenth mid-winter meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, St. Petersburg, FL.
25. Siegel, J. H. (1995). Cross-talk in otoacoustic emission probes. Ear and Hearing, 16(2), 1-9.
26. Stover, L., Gorga, M. P., Neely, S. T., & Montoya, D. (1996). Toward optimizing the clinical utility of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 956-967.
27. Sutton, L. A., Lonsbury-Martin, B. L., Martin, G. K., & Whitehead, M. L. (1994). Sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans to tonal over-exposure: Time course of recovery and effects of lowering L2. Hearing Research, 75(1-2), 161-174.
28. Talmadge, C. L., Long, G. R., Murphy, W. J., & Tubis, A. (1993). New off-line method for detecting spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in human subjects. Hearing Research, 71, 170-182.
29. SAS Institute Inc. (1995). The SAS System (Release 6.11). Cary, NC: Author.
30. Whitehead, M. L., Lonsbury-Martin, B. L., & Martin, G. K. (1993). The influence of noise on the measured amplitudes of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Hearing Research, 36, 1097-1102.
31. 1. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 2346-2358.
32. 2 space. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 2359-2377.