Technical Quality Criteria for Evaluating District Assessment Portfolios Used in the Nebraska STARS

Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 12-16

  Plake, Barbara S ^a   Impara, James C ^a   Buckendahl, Chad W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

Accountability; Assessment; Technical quality criteria

Indexed keywords

EID: 46049119530     PISSN: 07311745     EISSN: 17453992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3992.2004.tb00154.x     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999) Standards for educational and psychological testing, Washington, DC: Author.
2. Black, P., &William, D. (1998) Assessment and classroom learning. Educational Assessment: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5, 41–51.
3. Buckendahl, C. W., Impara, J. C., &Plake, B. S. (2002) District accountability without a state assessment: A proposed model. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 21, 6–16.
4. Buckendahl, C. W., Impara, J. C., &Plake, B. S. (2004) A strategy for evaluating district developed assessments for state accountability. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 23(2), 15–23.
5. Lukin, L. E., Bandalos, D. L., Eckhout, T., &Mickelson, K. (2004) Facilitating the development of assessment literacy. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 23(2), 24–30.
6. Roschewski, P. (2004) History and background of Nebraska's School-based Teacher-led Assessment and Reporting system (STARS). Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 23(2), 7–9.