메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 259-265

Revisiting a theory of negotiation: The utility of Markiewicz (2005) proposed six principles

Author keywords

Dealing with conflict; Empowerment; Stakeholder decision making

Indexed keywords

CONFLICT MANAGEMENT; DECISION MAKING; EMPOWERMENT; NEGOTIATION PROCESS; STAKEHOLDER; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 46049119205     PISSN: 01497189     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2008.03.003     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (4)

References (14)
  • 1
    • 46049107420 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Brinkerhoff, R. O. (2003). The success case method: Find out quickly what's working and what's not. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
    • Brinkerhoff, R. O. (2003). The success case method: Find out quickly what's working and what's not. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
  • 2
    • 14944350493 scopus 로고
    • Introduction to appreciative inquiry
    • French W., and Bell C. (Eds), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
    • Cooperrider D.L. Introduction to appreciative inquiry. In: French W., and Bell C. (Eds). Organizational development. 5th ed (1995), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
    • (1995) Organizational development. 5th ed
    • Cooperrider, D.L.1
  • 4
    • 0002493405 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Empowerment evaluation: An introduction to theory and practice
    • Fetterman D.M., Kaftarian S.J., and Wandersman A. (Eds), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
    • Fetterman D.M. Empowerment evaluation: An introduction to theory and practice. In: Fetterman D.M., Kaftarian S.J., and Wandersman A. (Eds). Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability (1996), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 3-46
    • (1996) Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability , pp. 3-46
    • Fetterman, D.M.1
  • 7
    • 46049117123 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A balancing act: Resolving multiple stakeholder interests in program evaluation
    • Markiewicz A. A balancing act: Resolving multiple stakeholder interests in program evaluation. Evaluation Journal of Australasia 4 1-2 (2005) 13-21
    • (2005) Evaluation Journal of Australasia , vol.4 , Issue.1-2 , pp. 13-21
    • Markiewicz, A.1
  • 8
    • 46049117125 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Owen, J. M. (2006). Program evaluation: Forms and approaches (3rd ed.). St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
    • Owen, J. M. (2006). Program evaluation: Forms and approaches (3rd ed.). St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
  • 9
    • 79957984636 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A world larger than formative and summative
    • Patton M.Q. A world larger than formative and summative. Evaluation Practice 17 2 (1996) 131-144
    • (1996) Evaluation Practice , vol.17 , Issue.2 , pp. 131-144
    • Patton, M.Q.1
  • 11
    • 46049101066 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Preskill, H. (1996). From evaluation to evaluative inquiry for organizational learning. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Evaluation Association, Atlanta, GA.
    • Preskill, H. (1996). From evaluation to evaluative inquiry for organizational learning. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Evaluation Association, Atlanta, GA.
  • 12
    • 0006095688 scopus 로고
    • Stakeholder influence in the evaluation of cities-in-schools
    • Stake R.A. Stakeholder influence in the evaluation of cities-in-schools. New Directions for Program Evaluation 17 (1983) 15-30
    • (1983) New Directions for Program Evaluation , vol.17 , pp. 15-30
    • Stake, R.A.1
  • 13
    • 46049117122 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Age (2005). 27th August, Fairfax, Melbourne.
    • The Age (2005). 27th August, Fairfax, Melbourne.
  • 14
    • 46049095348 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Worthen, B. (1996). Mechanisms for making the program evaluation standards meaningful to graduate education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Evaluation Association, November 1996, Atlanta, GA.
    • Worthen, B. (1996). Mechanisms for making the program evaluation standards meaningful to graduate education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Evaluation Association, November 1996, Atlanta, GA.


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.