‘A Balancing Act’: Resolving Multiple Stakeholder Interests in Program Evaluation

Evaluation Journal of Australasia

Volumn 4, Issue 1-2, 2005, Pages 13-21

  Markiewicz, Anne ^a  

^a Anne Markiewicz and Associates Pty Ltd   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 46049117123     PISSN: 1035719X     EISSN: 25159372     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1035719X05004001-203     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Adler S, Rosen B., & Silverstein E., 1998, ‘Emotions in negotiation: how to manage fear and anger’, Negotiation Journal, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 161–79
2. Alkin M., Hofstetter C., & Xiaoxia A., 1997, ‘Stakeholder concepts in program evaluation’, in Reynolds A, & Walberg H, (eds), Evaluation for educational productivity, JAI Press, Greenwich, Connecticut
3. Antes J., Hudson D., Jorgensen E., & Moen J., 1999, ‘Is a staged model of mediation necessary?’, Mediation Quarterly, vol. 16, no. 3, Spring, pp. 287–301
4. Ayers T., 1987, ‘Stakeholders as partners in evaluation: a stakeholder-collaborative approach’, Evaluation and Program Planning, vol. 10, pp. 263–71
5. Berk R., & Rossi P., 1990, Thinking about program evaluation, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California
6. Bush R., & Folger J., 1994, The promise of mediation: responding to conflict through empowerment and recognition, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
7. Byrk A.S., (ed.) 1983, Stakeholder-based evaluation: New directions for program evaluation, no. 17, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
8. Cousins J.B., & Earl L.M., 1995, (eds), Participatory evaluation in education: studies in evaluation use and organisational learning, Falmer Press, London
9. Egan G., 1990, The skilled helper: A systematic approach to effective helping, 4th edn, Brooks/Cole, California
10. Fetterman D.M., Kaftarian S.J., & Wandersman A., (eds) 1996, Empowerment Evaluation, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
11. Folger J., 1994, A transformative approach to mediation: skills for practice, Department of Communication Sciences, Temple University, Philadelphia
12. Gold N., 1983, ‘Stakeholder and program evaluation: characterisations and reflections’, in Bryk A.S., (ed), Stakeholder-based evaluation: New directions for program evaluation, no. 17, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
13. Guba E.G., & Lincoln Y.S., 1981, Effective evaluation, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
14. Guba E.G., & Lincoln Y.S., 1989a, Fourth Generation Evaluation, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California
15. Guba E.G., & Lincoln Y.S., 1989b, ‘The countenances of fourth-generation evaluation: description, judgment, and negotiation’, in Palumbo D.J., (ed.), The politics of program evaluation, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California
16. Hale K., 1998, ‘The Language of co-operation: negotiation frames’, Mediation Quarterly, vol. 16, no. 2. pp. 147–62
17. Heron J., 1992, ‘The politics of facilitation: balancing facilitator authority and learner autonomy’, in Mulligan J, & Griffin C, Empowerment through experiential learning (pp. 121–125), Kogan Page, London
18. House E.R., 1993, Professional evaluation, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California
19. Lawrence J., & Cook T., 1982, ‘Designing useful evaluations: the stakeholder survey’, Evaluation and Program Planning, vol. 5, pp. 327–36
20. Levinger G., & Rubin J., 1994, ‘Bridges and barriers to a more general theory of conflict’, Negotiation Journal, vol. 10, no. 3, July, pp 20–35
21. Mnookin R., Peppet S., & Tulumello A., 1996, ‘The tension between empathy and assertiveness’, Negotiation Journal, vol. 12, no. 3. pp. 25–38
22. Owen J., 1993, Program evaluation forms and approaches, Allen & Unwin, NSW
23. Owen J, with Rogers P., 1999, Program evaluation forms and approaches, 2nd edn, Allen & Unwin, NSW
24. Patton M.Q., 1997, Utilization-focused evaluation: the new century text, 3rd edn, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California
25. Pruit D.G., & Carnevale P.J., 1993, Negotiation in social conflict, Open University Press, Buckingham, UK
26. Putnam L., 1994, ‘Challenging the assumptions of traditional approaches to negotiation’, Negotiation Journal, vol. 10. no. 4, October, pp. 337–46
27. Roberts S., 1983, ‘Mediation in family disputes’, Modern Law Review, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 537–57
28. Scriven M., 1993, Hard won lessons in program evaluation: New directions for program evaluation, no. 58, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
29. Scriven M., 1996, ‘Types of evaluation and types of evaluator’, Evaluation Practice, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 151–61
30. Stake R., 1983, ‘Stakeholder influence in the evaluation of Cities-in-Schools’, in Bryk A.S., (ed) 1983, Stakeholder-based evaluation: New directions for program evaluation, no. 17, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
31. Wall J., & Stark J., 1996, ‘Techniques and sequences in mediation strategies: a proposed model for research’, Negotiation Journal, vol. 12, no. 3, July, pp. 231–9
32. Weiss C., 1983a, ‘The stakeholder approach to evaluation: origins and promise’, in Bryk A.S., (ed.), Stakeholder-based evaluation: New directions for program evaluation, no. 17, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
33. Weiss C., 1983b, ‘Toward the future of stakeholder approaches in evaluation’, in Bryk A.S., (ed.), Stakeholder-based evaluation: New directions for program evaluation, no. 17, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
34. Winslade J., Monk G., & Cotter A., 1998, ‘A narrative approach to the practice of mediation’, Negotiation Journal, vol. 14, no. 1, January, pp. 21–41