Chapter 1 Overview: Liberal learning in centralizing states

Research in the Sociology of Education

Volumn 16, Issue , 2008, Pages 1-29

  Fuller, Bruce ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 45949085551     PISSN: 14793539     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S1479-3539(08)16001-3     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Berliner D., and Biddle B. The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attack on America's public schools (1995), Addison-Wesley, New York
2. Borko H., and Elliott R. Hands-on pedagogy versus hands-off accountability. Phi Delta Kappan 80 (1999) 394-400
3. Carnoy M., and Loeb S. Does external accountability affect student outcomes? A cross-state analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 24 (2002) 305-331
4. Chubb J., and Moe T. Politics, markets and America's schools (1990), The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC
5. Clinton W. My life (2004), Vintage, New York
6. Clotfelter C., and Ladd H. Recognizing and rewarding success in public schools. In: Ladd H. (Ed). Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education (1996), Brookings Institution, Washington, DC
7. Cohen M. Key issues confronting state policymakers. In: Elmore R. (Ed). Restructuring schools: The next generation of educational reform (1990), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
8. Coleman J., Campbell E., Hobson C., McPartland F., Mood A., Weinfeld F., and York R. Equality of educational opportunity (1966), Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
9. Cross C. Political education: National policy comes of age (2004), Teachers College Press, New York
10. Elmore R., Abelman C., and Fuhrman S. The new accountability in state education reform: From process to performance. In: Ladd H. (Ed). Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education (1996), Brookings Institution, Washington, DC
11. Fuhrman S., and Elmore R. Understanding local control in the wake of state education reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 12 (1990) 82-96
12. Fuller B. Inside charter schools: The paradox of radical decentralization (2000), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
13. Fuller B. Standardized childhood: The cultural and political struggle over early education (2007), Stanford University Pres, Palo Alto
14. Fuller B., Gesicki K., Kang E., and Wright J. Gauging growth: How to judge No Child Left Behind?. Educational Researcher 36 (2007) 268-278
15. Fuller B., Loeb S., Arshan N., Chen A., and Yi S. California principals' resources: Acquisition, deployment, and barriers (2007), Institute for Research on Education Policy and Practice, Stanford
16. Fuller B., and Rasiah A. Schooling citizens for evolving democracies. In: Fuhrman S., and Lazerson M. (Eds). Institutions of American democracy: The public schools (2005), Oxford University Press, New York
17. Gamoran A., Secada W., and Marrett C. The organizational context of teaching and learning: Changing theoretical perspectives. In: Hallinan M. (Ed). Handbook of the sociology education (2000), Kluwer Plenum, New York
18. Garnier M., Hage J., and Fuller B. The strong state, social class, and controlled school expansion in France, 1881-1975. American Journal of Sociology 95 (1989) 279-306
19. Goertz M., and Duffy M. Assessment and accountability systems in 50 states, 1999-2000 (2001), Consortium for Policy Research in Education, Philadelphia
20. Hanushek E., and Raymond M. Does school accountability lead to improved student performance?. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 24 (2005) 297-327
21. Jennings J. Answering the question that matters most: Has student achievement increased since No Child Left Behind? (2007), Center for Education Policy, Washington, DC
22. Koretz D., Barron S., Mitchell K., and Stecher B. The perceived effects of the Kentucky Instruction Results Information System (1996), RAND, Santa Monica
23. Ladd H., and Hansen J. Making money matter: Financing America's schools (1999), National Academies Press, Washington, DC
24. Lee J., and Wong K. The impact of accountability on racial and socioeconomic equity: Considering both school resources and achievement outcomes. American Educational Research Journal 41 (2004) 797-832
25. Locke, J. (1964). Some thoughts concerning education, 1663. Reprinted In: P. Gay (Ed.), John Locke on education. New York: Teachers College Press.
26. Lockheed M. Primary education in India (1997), World Bank, Washington, DC
27. Madison, J. (1961). These departments should not be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other (no.48). In: C. Rossiter (Ed.), The federalist papers. New York: Penguin Books.
28. McClain L. The place of families: Fostering capacity, equality, and responsibility (2006), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
29. McNeil L., and Valenzuela A. The harmful impact of the TAAS system of testing in Texas: Beneath the accountability rhetoric (2000), Harvard Civil Rights Project, Cambridge, MA
30. Meyer J., and Rowan B. The structure of educational organizations. In: Meyer M. (Ed). Environments and organizations (1978), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
31. Mintrop H., and Trujillo T. The practical relevance of accountability systems for school improvement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 29 (2007) 319-352
32. Osborne D., and Gaebler T. Reinventing government (1992), Addison-Wesley, New York
33. PACE - Policy Analysis for California Education. (2006). Crucial issues in education, 2006. Berkeley and Stanford, CA: Graduate School of Education, University of California.
34. Peters T., and Waterman R. In search of excellence: Lessons from America's best-run companies (1982), Harper & Row, New York
35. Rodriguez R. Days of obligation: An argument with my Mexican father (1992), Penguin Books, New York
36. Romberg T., Zarinia E., and Williams S. The influence of mandated testing on mathematics instruction: Grade 8 teachers' perceptions (1989), National Center for Research in Mathematical Science Education, Madison
37. Rowan B. The new institutionalism and the study of education organizations: Changing ideas for changing times. In: Meyer H., and Rowan B. (Eds). The new institutionalism in education (2006), State University of New York Press, Albany
38. Rutter M., Maughan B., Mortimore P., and Ouston J. Fifteen thousand hours: Secondary schools and their effects on children (1982), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
39. Smith, M., & Fuller, B. (2007). Political leaders must shore up law's shaky foundation. San Francisco Chronicle, October 14, p. E1.
40. Smith M., and O'Day J. Systemic school reform. In: Fuhrman S., and Malen B. (Eds). The politics of curriculum and testing: The 1990 yearbook of the politics of education association (1991), Falmer Press, New York
41. Smith M.L., Edelsky K., Draper K., Rottenberg C., and Cherland M. The role of testing in elementary schools (1991), UCLA Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, Los Angeles
42. Stecher B. Consequences of large-scale, high-stakes testing on school and classroom practice. In: Hamilton L., Stecher B., and Klein S. (Eds). Making sense of test-based accountability in education (2002), RAND, Santa Monica, CA
43. Stecher B., Barron S., Chun T., and Ross K. The effects of the Washington state education reform on schools and classrooms (2000), UCLA Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, Los Angeles
44. Tyack D. The one best system: A history of American urban education (1974), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
45. Woody E., Buttles M., Kafka J., Park S., and Russell J. Voices from the field: Educators respond to accountability (2004), Policy Analysis for California Education, Berkeley and Stanford, CA