Variation in radiation sensitivity and repair kinetics in different parts of the spinal cord

Acta Oncologica

Volumn 47, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 928-936

  Adamus Górka, Magdalena ^a   Brahme, Anders ^a   Mavroidis, Panayiotis ^a,b   Lind, Bengt K ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF LARISSA   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER CONTROL; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CERVICAL SPINAL CORD; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DOSE RESPONSE; HEAD AND NECK CANCER; KINETICS; LUNG CARCINOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; RADIOSENSITIVITY; SPINAL CORD DISEASE; THORACIC SPINAL CORD;

CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, RADIATION; HEAD AND NECK NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MYELITIS; RADIATION TOLERANCE; SPINAL CORD; THORACIC VERTEBRAE;

EID: 45849144444     PISSN: 0284186X     EISSN: 1651226X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02841860701864668     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Cox J, Stetz J, Pajak T.Toxicity criteria of the radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) and the European organization for research and treatment of cancer (EORTG) Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995;31.
2. LENT SOMA. In: Tables Radiother Oncol 1995;35.
3. Rubin P, Casarett G.A direction for clinical radiation pathology. The tolerance dose Front Rad Ther Oncol 1972;6.
4. Emami B, Lyman J, Brown A, Coia L, Goitein M, Munzenrider JE, et al.Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1991;21.
5. Eriksson F, Gagliardi G, Liendberg A, Lax I, Lee C, Levitt S, et al.Long-term cardiac mortality following radiation therapy for Hodgkin's disease: Analysis with the relative seriality model Radiother Oncol 2000;55.
6. Jackson A, Ten Haken RK, Robertson JM, Kessler ML, Kutcher GJ, Lawrence TS.Analysis of clinical complication data for radiation hepatitis using a parallel architecture model Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995;31.
7. Lebesque JV, Bruce AM, Kroes AP, Touw A, Shouman RT, van Herk M.Variation in volumes, dose-volume histograms and estimated normal tissue complication probabilities of rectum and bladder during conformal radiotherapy of T3 prostate cancer Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995;33.
8. Mavroidis P, Lind BK, Theodorou K, Laurell G, Fernberg JO, Lefkopoulos D, et al.Statistical methods for clinical verification of dose-response parameters related to esophageal stricture and AVM obliteration from radiotherapy Phys Med Biol 2004;49.
9. Ågren A-K. Quantification of the response of heterogeneous tumors and organized normal tissues to fractionated radiotherapy. Thesis. Stockholm University, 1995.
10. Karlsson B, Lax I, Söderman M.Can the probability for obliteration after radiosurgery of arteriovenous malformations be accurately predicted? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999;43.
11. Mavroidis P, Laurell G, Kraepelien T, Fernberg JO, Lind BK, Brahme A.Determination and clinical verification of dose-response parameters for esophageal stricture from head and neck radiotherapy Acta Oncol 2003;42.
12. Maehle Schmidt M. A Bayesian approach for sequential updating of dose-response relations in radiation therapy. Licentiate Thesis. Stockholm University, 2002.
13. Archambeau JO, Shymko RM.Tissue population configuration as a modifier of organ response Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1988;15.
14. Brahme A.Treatment optimization using physical and biological objective functions In: Smith A, editors. Radiation Therapy Physics.
15. Källman P, Lind BK, Brahme A.An algorithm for maximizing the probability of complication free tumor control in radiation therapy Phys Med Biol 1992;37.
16. Källman P, .Ågren A-K, Brahme A.Tumor and normal tissue responses to fractionated non uniform dose delivery Int J Radiat Biol 1992;62.
17. Adamus-Górka M, Mavroidis P, Lind BK, Brahme A. Comparison of different dose response models and volume dependences for rat spinal cord. Phys Med 2007 Submitted.
18. Steel GG. Basic clinical radiobiology.
19. Sminia P, Oldenburger F, Slotman B, Schneider C, Hulshof M.Re-irradiation of the human spinal cord Strahlenther Onkol 2002;178.
20. Abbatucci S, Delozier T, Quint R, Roussel A, Brune D.Radiation myelopathy of the cervical spinal cord: Time, dose and volume factors Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1978;4.
21. Reinhold H, Kaalen J, Unger-Gils K.Radiation myelopathy of the thoracic spinal cord Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1976;1.
22. Gagliardi G, Bjöhle J, Lax I, Ottolenghi A, Eriksson F, Liedberg A, et al.Radiation pneumonitis after breast cancer irradiation: Analysis of the complication probability using the relative seriality model Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000;46.
23. Mavroidis P, Lind BK, Van Dijk J, Koedooder K, De Neve W, De Wagter C, et al.Comparison of conformal radiation therapy techniques within the dynamic radiotherapy project 'DYNARAD' Phys Med Biol 2000;45.
24. Lind BK, Mavroidis P, Hyödynmaa S, Kappas C.Optimization of the dose level for a given treatment plan to maximize the complication free tumor cure Acta Oncol 1999;38.
25. .Ågren A-K, Brahme A, Turesson I.Optimization of uncomplicated control for head and neck tumors Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1990;19.
26. Fowler JF.Brief summary of radiobiological principles in fractionated radiotherapy Semin Radiat Oncol 1992;2.
27. Mavroidis P, al-Abany M, Helgason AR, .Ågren Cronqvist A-K, Wersäll P, et al.Dose-response relations for anal sphincter regarding faecal leakage and blood or phlegm in stools after radiotherapy for prostate cancer Strahlenther Onkol 2005;181.
28. Stavrev P, Stavrev N. Fraction size and dose parameters related to the incidence of pericardial effusions: Regarding Martel et al. IJROBP 40(1):155-161;1998. Int J Radiat Biol Phys 2000;48:611-3.
29. Bijl HP, van Luijk P, Coppes RP, Schippers JM, Konings AWT, van der Kogel AJ.Regional differences in radiosensitivity across the rat cervical spinal cord Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005;61.
30. Burman C, Kutcher GJ, Emami B, Goitein M.Fitting of normal tissue tolerance data to an analytic function Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1991;21.
31. Gray H. Anatomy of the Human Body. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1918. Bartleby.com, 2000. www.bartleby.com/107/. [Date of printout: October 2007].
32. Ågren A-K, Källman P, Brahme A.Determination of the relative seriality of a tissue from its response to non-uniform dose delivery In: Baltas D, editors. Modelling in clinical radiobiology. Germany: Albert Ludwigs University Freiburg; 1997. p. 127-41.