Path planning under spatial uncertainty

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 495-504

  Wiener, Jan M ^a   Lafon, Matthieu ^a   Berthoz, Alain ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PLANNING; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; ADULT; ATTITUDE; BEHAVIOR; DEPTH PERCEPTION; LEARNING; MOTIVATION;

ADULT; ATTITUDE; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MOTIVATION; SPACE PERCEPTION; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 45849139715     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/MC.36.3.495     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. BUREŠ, J., BUREŠOVÁ, O., & NERAD, L. (1992). Can rats solve a simple version of the traveling salesman problem? Behavioural Brain Research, 52, 133-142.
2. CHRISTENFELD, N. (1995). Choices from identical options. Psychological Science, 6, 50-55.
3. GALLISTEL, C. R., & CRAMER, A. E. (1996). Computations on metric maps in mammals: Getting oriented and choosing a multi-destination route. Journal of Experimental Biology, 199, 211-217.
4. GÄRLING, T., & GÄRLING, E. (1988). Distance minimization in downtown pedestrian shopping. Environment & Planning A, 20, 547-554.
5. GÄRLING, T., SÄISÄ, J., BÖÖK, J., & LINDBERG, E. (1986). The spatiotemporal sequencing of everyday activities in the large-scale environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 6, 261-280.
6. GOLDEN, B., BODIN, L., DOYLE, T., & STEWART, W. (1980). Approximate traveling salesman algorithms. Operations Research, 28, 694-711.
7. GOLLEDGE, R. (1995). Path selection and route preference in human navigation: A progress report. In A. U. Frank & W. Kuhn (Eds.), Spatial information theory: A theoretical basis for GIS (COSIT '95) (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, No. 988, pp. 207-222). Berlin: Springer.
8. GRAHAM, S. M., JOSHI, A., & PIZLO, Z. (2000). The traveling salesman problem: A hierarchical model. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1191-1204.
9. HIRTLE, S. C., & GÄRLING, T. (1992). Heuristic rules for sequential spatial decisions. Geoforum, 23, 227-238.
10. HÖLSCHER, C., MEILINGER, T., VRACHLIOTIS, G., BRÖSAMLE, M., & KNAUFF, M. (2006). Up the down staircase: Wayfinding strategies in multi-level buildings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26, 284-299.
11. MACGREGOR, J. N., CHRONICLE, E. P., & ORMEROD, T. C. (2004). Convex hull or crossing avoidance? Solution heuristics in the traveling salesperson problem. Memory & Cognition, 32, 260-270.
12. MACGREGOR, J. N., & ORMEROD, T. C. (1996). Human performance on the traveling salesman problem. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 527-539.
13. MACGREGOR, J. N., ORMEROD, T. C., & CHRONICLE, E. P. (1999). Spatial and contextual factors in human performance on the traveling salesperson problem. Perception, 28, 1417-1427.
14. MACGREGOR, J. N., ORMEROD, T. C., & CHRONICLE, E. P. (2000). A model of human performance on the traveling salesperson problem. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1183-1190.
15. SHANKS, D., TUNNEY, R., & MCCARTHY, J. (2002). A re-examination of probability matching and rational choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 233-250.
16. VAN ROOIJ, I., STEGE, U., & SCHACTMAN, A. (2003). Convex hull and tour crossings in the Euclidean traveling salesperson problem: Implications for human performance studies. Memory & Cognition, 31, 215-220.
17. VICKERS, D., BOVET, P., LEE, M. D., & HUGHES, P. (2003). The perception of minimal structures: Performance on open and closed versions of visually presented Euclidean traveling salesperson problems. Perception, 32, 871-886.
18. VICKERS, D., LEE, M. D., DRY, M., & HUGHES, P. (2003). The roles of the convex hull and the number of potential intersections in performance on visually presented traveling salesperson problems. Memory & Cognition, 31, 1094-1104.
19. VICKERS, D., LEE, M. D., DRY, M., HUGHES, P., & MCMAHON, J. A. (2006). The aesthetic appeal of minimal structures: Judging the attractiveness of solutions to traveling salesperson problems. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 32-42.
20. VULKAN, N. (2000). An economist's perspective on probability matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 14, 101-118.
21. WEST, R., & STANOVICH, K. (2003). Is probability matching smart? Associations between probabilistic choices and cognitive ability. Memory & Cognition, 31, 243-251.
22. WIENER, J. M., & MALLOT, H. A. (2003). "Fine-to-coarse" route planning and navigation in regionalized environments. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 3, 331-358.
23. WIENER, J. M., SCHNEE, A., & MALLOT, H. A. (2004). Use and interaction of navigation strategies in regionalized environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 475-493.