Researcher identification: the right needle in the haystack

The Lancet

Volumn 371, Issue 9631, 2008, Pages 2152-2153

  Cals, Jochen WL ^a   Kotz, Daniel ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DATA BASE; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION;

EID: 45849137887     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60931-9     Document Type: Note

References (8)

1. Wuchty S., Jones B., and Uzzi B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316 (2007) 1036-1039
2. De Angelis C., Drazen J., Frizelle F., et al. Is this clinical trial fully registered? A statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Lancet 365 (2005) 1827-1829
3. Laine C., Horton R., DeAngelis C., et al. Clinical trial registration: looking back and moving ahead. Lancet 369 (2007) 1909-1911
4. Thomson R. Thomson Scientific launches ResearcherID.com to associate a researcher with their published works. http://scientific.thomsonreuters.com/press/2008/8429910 (accessed June 23, 2008).
5. Seglen P. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ 314 (1997) 498-502
6. Vucovich L., Baker J., and Smith J. Analyzing the impact of an author's publications. J Med Libr Assoc 96 (2008) 63-66
7. Williams G. Should we ditch impact factors?. BMJ 334 (2007) 568
8. Dickersin K., Scherer R., Suci E., and Gil-Montero M. Problems with indexing and citation of articles with group authorship. JAMA 287 (2002) 2772-2774