The effect of task location and task type on backward inhibition

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 534-543

  Arbuthnott, Katherine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGINA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPOTHESIS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; RESPONSE TIME; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; ADOLESCENT; DEPTH PERCEPTION; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MIDDLE AGED;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); JUDGMENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 45849121772     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/MC.36.3.534     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. ALLPORT, D. A., STYLES, E. A., & HSIEH, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 421-452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. ARBUTHNOTT, K. D. (2005). The influence of cue type on backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 1030-1042.
3. ARBUTHNOTT, K. D. (in press). Asymmetric switch cost and backward inhibition: Carryover activation and inhibition in switching between tasks of unequal difficulty. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology.
4. ARBUTHNOTT, K. [D.], & FRANK, J. [E.] (2000). Executive control in set switching: Residual switch cost and task-set inhibition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 33-41.
5. ARBUTHNOTT, K. D., & WOODWARD, T. S. (2002). The influence of cue-task association and location on switch cost and alternating-switch cost. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 18-29.
6. GADE, M., & KOCH, I. (2005). Linking inhibition to activation in the control of task sequences. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 530-534.
7. GADE, M., & KOCH, I. (in press). Cue-independence of task inhibition: Evidence from a 2:1 cue-to-task mapping study. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology.
8. HÜBNER, M., DREISBACH, G., HAIDER, H., & KLUWE, R. H. (2003). Backward inhibition as a means of sequential task-set control: Evidence for reduction of task competition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 289-297.
9. JERSILD, A. (1927). Mental set and shift. Archives of Psychology, 89, 5-82.
10. KOCH, I., GADE, M., & PHILIPP, A. M. (2004). Inhibition of response mode in task switching. Experimental Psychology, 51, 52-58.
11. KOCH, I., PHILIPP, A. M., & GADE, M. (2006). Chunking in task sequences modulates task inhibition. Psychological Science, 17, 346-350.
12. LOGAN, G. D., & BUNDESEN, C. (2003). Clever homunculus: Is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing paradigm? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 575-599.
13. MAYR, U. (2002). Inhibition of action rules. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 93-99.
14. MAYR, U., & BRYCK, R. L. (2007). Outsourcing control to the environment: Effects of stimulus/response locations on task selection. Psychological Research, 71, 107-116.
15. MAYR, U., & KEELE, S. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4-26.
16. MAYR, U., & KLIEGL, R. (2000). Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 1124-1140.
17. MAYR, U., & KLIEGL, R. (2003). Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 363-372.
18. PHILIPP, A. M., GADE, M., & KOCH, I. (2007). Inhibitory processes in language switching: Evidence from switching language-defined response sets. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 395-416.
19. PHILIPP, A. M., & KOCH, I. (2006). Task inhibition and task repetition in task switching. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18, 624-639.
20. ROGERS, R., & MONSELL, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
21. SCHNEIDER, D. W. (2007). Task-set inhibition in chunked task sequences. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 970-976.
22. SCHUCH, S., & KOCH, I. (2003). The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 92-105.
23. SPECTOR, A., & BIEDERMAN, I. (1976). Mental set and mental shift revisited. American Journal of Psychology, 89, 669-679.