Evaluation of a hearing screener

Audiological Medicine

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 115-119

  Parving, Agnete ^a   Sørup Sørensen, Mette ^a   Christensen, Birger ^a   Davis, Adrian ^b  

^a BISPEBJERG HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Hearing screening; Lean services; Sensitivity; Specificity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY SCREENING; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; COST CONTROL; DEVELOPED COUNTRY; DEVELOPING COUNTRY; DEVICE; EAR; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEARING AID; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL OUTCOME INVENTORY FOR HEARING AIDS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; SAFETY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 45849107189     PISSN: 1651386X     EISSN: 16513835     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/16513860801995633     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Olusanya BO, Ruben RJ, Parving A. Reducing the burden of communication disorders in the developing world. JAMA. 2006;296:441-4.
2. Shield B. Evaluation of the social and economic costs of hearing impairment. Report for Hear- it, AISBC; 2006.
3. Parving A, Newton V. Editorial. Audiol Med. 2005;3:74-5.
4. Davis A, Smith P, Ferguson M, Stephens D, Gianopoulos I. Acceptability, benefit and costs of early screening for hearing disability: a study of potential screening tests and models. UK: HTA; 2007.
5. ISO 8253 1-3. Acoustics-audiometric test methods. Part I. Basic pure tone air and bone conduction threshold audiometry. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization. 2000.
6. Acoustics: Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment. Reference equivalent threshold force levels for pure tones and bone vibrators. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization. 1994.
7. Parving A. The value of speech audiometry in hearing aid rehabilitation. Scand Audiol. 1991;20:159-64.
8. Byrne D, Dillon H. The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) new procedure for selecting the gain and frequency response of a hearing aid. Ear Hear. 1986;7:257-65.
9. Cox RM, Alexander CG. The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): psychometric properties of the English version. J Audiol. 2002;41:30-5.
10. Cox RM, Alexander GC. Measuring satisfaction with amplification in daily life: the SADL scale. Ear Hear. 1999;20:306-20.
11. Barton GR, Davis AC, Parving A, Roine R, Sorri M, Stilven S. Cross-sectional survey of adult hearing aid services in Denmark, Finland and the UK. Audiol Med. 2003;1:107-14.
12. Department of Health, England. Good practice in transforming adult hearing services for patients with hearing difficulty. June 2007.