The reform of the 2003 Common Agricultural Policy: An advocacy coalition explanation

Policy Studies

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 179-195

  Nedergaard, Peter ^a  

^a Copenhagen Business School ^*  (Denmark)

Author keywords

Advocacy Coalition Framework; Agricultural reform; Collective action; Common Agricultural Policy; European Union; Policy analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 45749143620     PISSN: 01442872     EISSN: 14701006     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01442870802033464     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Coleman, W.D. and Tangermann, S., 1999. CAP reform, the Uruguay round and the Commission: conceptualising linked policy games. Journal of common market studies, 37 (3), 385-405.
2. COPA 2002. Our vision for the future: a sustainable agriculture for all Europeans. Brussels.
3. Elliott, C. and Schlaepfer, R., 2001. Understanding forest certification using the advocacy coalition framework. Forest policy and economics, 2, 257-266.
4. Fenger, M. and Klok, P.-J., 2001. Interdependency, beliefs, and coalition behavior: a contribution to the advocacy coalition framework. Policy sciences, 34, 157-170.
5. Fischler, F., 2001. CAP - state of the play. Speech, April 2001. The Commission, Brussels.
6. Fischler, F., 2002. Towards sustainable farming. Speech no. 330/2002. The Commission, Brussels.
7. Fischler, F., 2003. Reform of CAP. Speech no. 326/2003. The Commission, Brussels.
8. Garzon, I., 2006. Reforming the common agricultural policy: history of a paradigm change. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
9. Hajer, M., 1995. The politics of environmental discourse - ecological modernization and policy process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Hajer, M., 2002. Discourse analysis and the study of policy making. European policy science, 2 (1), 61-65.
11. Hix, S., 2005. The political system of the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
12. John, P., 2003. Is there life after policy streams, advocacy coalitions, and punctuations: using evolutionary theory to explain policy change? The policy studies journal, 31 (4), 481-498.
13. Keeler, J., 1996. Agricultural power in the European Community. Comparative politics, 28 (2), 127-149.
14. Kübler, D., 2001. Understanding policy change with the advocacy coalition framework: an application to Swiss drug policy. Journal of European public policy, 8 (4), 623-641.
15. Nedergaard, P., 1995. The political economy of the CAP reform. In: F. Laursen, ed. The political economy of European integration. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 111-144.
16. Nedergaard, P., 2006. The 2003 reform of the common agricultural policy: against all odds or rational explanations? Journal of European integration, 28 (3), 203-223.
17. Nugent, N., 2003. The government and politics of the European Union. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
18. OECD 2004. Analysis of the 2003 CAP reform. Paris.
19. Ostrom, B., 1990. Governing the commons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Oxfam 2002. Europe's double standards. London.
21. Paarlberg, R., 1997. Agricultural policy reform and the Uruguay round: synergistic linkage in the two-level game? International organization, 51 (3), 413-444.
22. Roederer-Rynning, C., 2003. Informal governance in the Common Agricultural Policy: the role of relational systems. Working Paper no. 15/2003, Centre for European Studies, University of Southern Denmark.
23. Sabatier, P.A., 1988. An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy science, 21, 129-168.
24. Sabatier, P.A., 1993. Policy change and learning: an advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
25. Sabatier, P.A., 1998. The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal for European public policy, 5 (1), 98-130.
26. Sabatier, P.A. and Jenkins-Smith, H.C., 1999. The advocacy coalition framework: an assessment. In: P.A. Sabatier, ed. Theories of the policy process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 117-166.
27. Saetren, H., 2005. Facts and myths about research on public policy implementation: out-offashion, allegedly dead, but still very much alive and relevant. The policy studies journal, 33 (4), 559-582.
28. Schlager, E., 1995. Policy making and collective action: defining coalitions within the advocacy coalition framework. Policy sciences, 28 (3), 243-270.
29. Surel, Y., 2000. The role of cognitive and normative frames in policy-making. Journal of European public policy, 7 (4), 495-512.
30. Zafonte, M. and Sabatier, P., 1998. Shared beliefs and imposed interdependencies as determinants of ally networks in overlapping subsystems. Journal of theoretical politics, 10, 473-505.
31. Zafonte, M. and Sabatier, P., 2004. Short-term versus long-term coalitions in the policy process: automotive pollution control, 1963-1989. The policy studies journal, 32 (1), 75-107.