On the generic circumscription of Gonolobus (Apocynaceae, Asclepiadoideae): Evidence from molecules and morphology

Systematic Botany

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 403-415

  Krings, Alexander ^a   Thomas, David T ^a   Xiang, Qiu Yun ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Delimitation; Dorsal anther appendages; Gonolobinae; Winged follicles

Indexed keywords

APOCYNACEAE; ASCLEPIADEAE; ASCLEPIADOIDEAE; GONOLOBUS;

EID: 45749131063     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: 15482324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1600/036364408784571527     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Alfaro, M. E., S. Zoller, and F. Lutzoni. 2003. Bayes or Bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence. Molecular Biology and Evolution 20: 255-266.
2. Blázquez, M. A., L. N. Soowal, I. Lee, and D. Weigel. 1997. LEAFY expression and flower initiation in Arabidopsis. Development 124: 3835-3844.
3. CodonCode Corporation. 2006. CodonCode Aligner. Dedham, Massachussets: CodonCode Corporation.
4. Cunningham, C. W. 1997. Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined? Molecular Biology and Evolution 14: 733-740.
5. Douady, C. J., F. Delsuc, Y. Boucher, W. F. Doolittle, and E. J. Douzery. 2003. Comparison of Bayesian and maximum likelihood bootstrap measures of phylogenetic reliability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 20: 248-254.
6. Drapalik, D. J. 1969. A biosystematic study of the genus Matelea in the southeastern United States. Ph.D. dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
7. Endress, M. E. and P. V. Bruyns. 2000. A revised classification of the Apocynaceae, s.l. Botanical Review 66: 1-56.
8. Erixon, P., B. Svennblad, T. Britton, and B. Oxelman. 2003. Reliability of Bayesian posterior probabilities and bootstrapping frequencies in phylogenetics. Systematic Biology 52: 665-673.
9. Farris, J. S., M. Källersjö, A. G. Kluge, and C. Bult. 1995. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315-319.
10. Fontella, P. J. and E. A. Schwarz. 1981a. Estudos em Asclepiadaceae XII. Consideracoes sobre os generos Roulinia Decne. et Rouliniella Vail. Boletim do Museu Botanico Municipal 45: 1-12.
11. Fontella, P. J. and E. A. Schwarz. 1981b. Estudos em Asclepiadaceae, XIII. Novos sinônimos e novas combinações. Boletim do Museu Botanico Municipal 46: 1-10.
12. Frohlich, M. W. and E. M. Meyerowitz. 1997. The search for flower homeotic gene homologs in basal angiosperms and Gnetales: a potential new source of data on the evolutionary origin of flowers. International Journal of Plant Sciences 158: S131-S142.
13. Frohlich, M. W. and D. S. Parker. 2000. The mostly male theory of flower evolutionary origins: from genes to fossils. Systematic Botany 25: 155-170.
14. Huelsenbeck, J. P. and F. Ronquist. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 17: 754-755.
15. Krings, A. 2005. Notes on the Matelea bayatensis-correllii-tigrina complex (Apocynaceae - Asclepiadoideae - Gonolobinae) in the Greater Antilles and Bahamas. Sida 21: 1525-1533.
16. Krings, A. 2006. Four novelties and a lectotypification in Matelea (Apocynaceae, Asclepiadoideae) from Hispaniola. Sida 22: 941-953.
17. Krings, A. and A. C. Saville. 2007. Two new species and three lectotypifications in the Ibatia-Matelea complex (Apocynaceae: Asclepiadoideae) from the northern South America. Systematic Botany 32: 862-871.
18. Krings, A. and Q.-Y. Xiang. 2004. The Gonolobus complex (Apocynaceae - Asclepiadoideae) in the southeastern United States. Sida 21: 103-116.
19. Krings, A. and Q.-Y. Xiang. 2005. Taxonomy of the Gonolobus complex (Apocynaceae - Asclepiadoideae) in the southeastern US: ISSR evidence and parsimony analysis. Harvard Papers in Botany 10: 147-159.
20. Kunze, H. 1995. Floral morphology of some Gonolobeae (Asclepiadaceae). Botanische Jahrbücher der Systematik 117: 211-238.
21. Lee, B.-Y. and S. R. Downie. 2000. Phylogenetic analysis of cpDNA restriction sites and rps16 intron sequences reveals relationships among Apiaceae tribes Caucalideae, Scandiceae and related taxa. Plant Systematics and Evolution 221: 35-60.
22. Levin, R. A. and J. S. Miller. 2005. Relationships within tribe Lycieae (Solanaceae): Paraphyly of Lycium and multiple origins of gender dimorphism. American Journal of Botany 92: 2044-2053.
23. Liede, S. 1997. Subtribes and genera of the tribe Asclepiadeae (Apocynaceae, Asclepiadoideae)-A synopsis. Taxon 46: 233-247.
24. Liede, S. and H. Kunze. 1993. A descriptive system for corona analysis in Asclepiadaceae and Periplocaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 185: 275-284.
25. Liede, S. and H. Kunze. 2002. Cynanchum and the Cynanchinae (Apocynaceae - Asclepiadoideae): A molecular, anatomical and latex triterpenoid study. Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 2: 239-269.
26. Liede-Schumann, S., A. Rapini, D. J. Goyder, and M. W. Chase. 2005. Phylogenetics of the New World subtribes of Asclepiadeae (Apocynaceae- Asclepiadoideae): Metastelmatinae, Oxypetalinae, and Gonolobinae. Systematic Botany 30: 184-195.
27. Livshultz, T. 2003. Systematics of Dischidia (Apocynaceae, Asclepiadoideae). Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.
28. Mabberley, D. J. 1997. The plant-book: A portable dictionary of the vascular plants. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. MacRoberts, B. R. and M. H. MacRoberts. 2006. An updated, annotated vascular flora of Caddo Parish, Louisiana, with notes on regional phyogeography and ecology. Sida 22: 1191-1219.
30. Maddison, D. R. and W. P. Maddison. 2003. MacClade 4, Release version 4.06. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
31. Morillo, G. 1997. Revisión preliminar de Metalepis Griseb. (Asclepiadaceae). Pittieria 26: 65-99.
32. Oh, S.-H. and D. Potter. 2003. Phylogenetic utility of the second intron of LEAFY in Neillia and Stephanandra (Rosaceae) and implications for the origin of Stephanandra. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 29: 203-215.
33. Posada, D. 2005. Modeltest 3.7. Vigo, Spain: Universidade de Vigo.
34. Posada, D. and T. R. Buckley. 2004. Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of the AIC and Bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Systematic Biology 53: 793-808.
35. Rambaut, A. and A. Drummond. 2004. Tracer, MCMC Trace Analysis Tool, version 1.1. Oxford: University of Oxford.
36. Rapini, A., M. W. Chase, and T. U. P. Konno. 2006. Phylogenetics of South American Asclepiadoideae (Apocynaceae). Taxon 55: 119-124.
37. Rapini, A., M. W. Chase, D. J. Goyder, and J. Griffiths. 2003. Asclepiadeae classification: evaluating the phylogenetic relationships of New World Asclepiadoideae (Apocynaceae). Taxon 52: 33-50.
38. Reveal, J. L. and F. R. Barrie. 1992. Matelea suberosa (L.) Shinners (Asclepiadaceae) - once again. Bartonia 57: 36-38.
39. Ronquist, F. and J. P. Huelsenbeck. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 19: 1572-1574.
40. Rosatti, T. J. 1989. The genera of suborder Apocynineae (Apocynaceae and Asclepiadaceae) in the southeastern United States. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 70: 443-514.
41. Shinners, L. H. 1950. The species of Matelea (including Gonolobus) in North Central Texas (Asclepiadaceae). Field & Laboratory 18: 73-78.
42. Shinners, L. H. 1964. Texas Asclepiadaceae other than Asclepias. Sida 1: 358-367.
43. Simmons, M. P., K. M. Pickett, and M. Miya. 2004. How meaningful are Bayesian posterior probabilities? Molecular Biology and Evolution 21: 188-199.
44. Smith, S. D. and D. A. Baum. 2006. Phylogenetics of the florally diverse Andean clade Iochrominae (Solanaceae). American Journal of Botany 93: 1140-1153.
45. Spellman, D. 1975. Flora of Panama: Asclepiadaceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 62: 103-156.
46. Stevens, W. D. 2001. Asclepiadaceae. Pp. 234-270 in Flora de Nicaragua. Monographs in Systematic Botany no. 85, eds. W. D. Stevens, C. Ulloa U., A. Pool, and O. M. Montiel. St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden.
47. Stevens, W. D. 2005. Fourteen new species of Gonolobus (Apocynaceae, Asclepiadoideae) from Mexico and Central America. Novon 15: 222-244.
48. Sundell, E. 1981. The New World species of Cynanchum subg. Mellichampia (Asclepiadaceae). Evolutionary Monographs 5: 1-62.
49. Susuki, Y., G. V. Glazko, and M. Nei. 2002. Overcredibility of molecular phylogenetics obtained by Bayesian phylogenetics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 99: 16138-16143.
50. Swarupanandan, K., J. K. Mangaly, T. K. Sonny, K. Kishorekumar, and S. Chand Basha. 1996. The subfamilial and tribal classification of the family Asclepiadaceae. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 120: 327-369.
51. Swofford, D. L. 2003. PAUP* 4.0b10. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
52. Taberlet, P., L. Gielly, G. Pautou, and J. Bouvet. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Molecular Biology 17: 1105-1109.
53. Vethacke, M. U. 1994. Systematische Untersuchungen an Gattungen der Tribus Gonolobeae (Asclepiadaceae). Diplomarbeit, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Münster.
54. Wilcox, T. P., D. J. Swickl, T. A. Heath, and D. M. Hillis. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships of the dwarf boas and a comparison of Bayesian and bootstrap measures of phylogenetic support. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 25: 361-371.
55. Woodson, R. E. Jr. 1941. The North American Asclepiadaceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 28: 193-244.
56. Wunderlin, R. P. 1998. A guide to the vascular plants of Florida. Gainesville: University of Florida Press.
57. Young, N. D. and J. Healy. 2003. GapCoder automates the use of indel characters in phylogenetic analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 4: 6.