On the nature of goal marking and delimitation: Evidence from Japanese

Journal of Linguistics

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 283-316

  Beavers, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 45749095471     PISSN: 00222267     EISSN: 14697742     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0022226708005136     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Aissen, Judith. 2003. Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 21, 435-483.
2. Aske, Jon. 1989. Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. In BLS 15, 1-14.
3. Beavers, John. 2002. Aspect and the distribution of prepositional resultative phrases in English. LinGO Working Paper #2002-7. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
4. Beavers, John. 2006. Argument/oblique alternations and the structure of lexical meaning. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.
5. Beavers, John. 2008. Scalar complexity and the structure of events. In Johannes Dölling, Tatjana Heyde-Zybatow & Martin Schäfer (eds.), Event structures in linguistic form and interpretation, 245-265. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
6. Beavers, John, Beth Levin & Shiao-Wei Tham. 2008. The typology of motion events revisited. Ms., The University of Texas at Austin, Stanford University & Wellesley College.
7. Bohnemeyer, Jürgen, Nicholas J. Enfield, James Essegbey, Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Sotaro Kita, Friederike Lüpke &Felix K. Ameka. 2007. Principles of event segmentation in language: The case of motion events. Language 83, 495-532.
8. Bonami, Olivier. 1997. The aspectual impact of French locative PPs. In Alice Drewery, Geert-Jan Kruijff & Richard Zuber (eds.), The Second ESSLLI Student Session. Université de Provence.
9. Bonami, Olivier. 1999. Les constructions du verbe: Le cas des groupes prépositionnels argumentaux. Ph.D. thesis, Université Paris 7.
10. Bresnan, Joan & Annie Zaenen. 1990. Deep unaccusativity in LFG. In Katarzyna Dziwirek, Patrick M. Farrell & Errapel Meijas-Bikandi (eds.), Grammatical relations: A cross-theoretical perspective, 45-57. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
11. Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel.
12. Dowty, David. 1979. Word meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.
13. Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67, 547-619.
14. Dubinsky, Stanley. 1990. Japanese direct object to indirect object demotion. In Paul M. Postal & Brian D. Joseph (eds.), Studies in relational grammar 3, 49-86. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
15. Dubinsky, Stanley. 1994. Predicate union and the syntax of Japanese causatives. Journal of Linguistics 30, 43-79.
16. Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
17. Hale, Kenneth & Samuel J. Keyser. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In Kenneth Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds.), The view from Building 20: Essays in lingusitics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 53-109. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Hale, Ken & Samuel J. Keyser. 1997. The limits of argument structure. In Amaya Mendikoetxea & Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria (eds.), Theoretical issues at the morphology-syntax interface, 203-230. Bilbao: Universidad de País Vasco, Euskal Herriko Univertsitatea.
19. Hay, Jennifer, Christopher Kennedy & Beth Levin. 1999. Scalar structure underlies telicity in degree achievements. In SALT IX, 127-144.
20. Im, Sung-Chool. 2001. Typological patterns of motion verbs and their semantic differences in Korean. In International Symposium on Korean Linguistics, 123-150. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
21. Inagaki, Shunji. 2002. Motion verbs with locational/directional PPs in English and Japanese. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 47, 187-234.
22. Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Jackendoff, Ray. 1996. The proper treatment of measuring out, telicity, and perhaps event quantification in English. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 14, 305-354.
24. Kindaichi, Haruhiko. 1976. Kokugo dooshi no ichibunrui [A classification of Japanese verbs]. In Haruhiko Kindaichi (ed.), Nihongo dooshi no asupekuto [Aspect in Japanese verbs], 5-26. Tokyo: Mugi Shobo.
25. Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon, 109-137. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
26. Krifka, Manfred. 1998. The origins of telicity. In Susan Rothstein (ed.), Events and grammar, 197-235. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
27. Kuno, Susumu. 1973. The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity : At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Makino, Seiichi & Michio Tsutsui. 1986. A dictionary of basic Japanese grammar. Tokyo: The Japan Times.
30. Martin, Samuel. 1975. A reference grammar of Japanese. New Haven: Yale University Press.
31. Martínez Vázquez, Montserrat. 2001. Delimited events in English and Spanish. Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense 9, 31-59.
32. Matsumoto, Yo. 1997. Kuukan iddo no gengo hyoogen to sono kakutyoo [Linguistic expressions of spatial motion and their extensions]. In Shigenori Tanaka & Yo Matsumoto (eds.), Kuukan to idoo no hyoogen [Expression of space and motion], 126-229. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.
33. Miyagawa, Shigeru. 1989. Structure and case marking in Japanese. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
34. Muehleisen, Victoria & Mutsumi Imai. 1996. Transitivity and the incorporation of ground information in Japanese path verbs. In Keedong Lee, Eve Sweetser & Marjolijn Vespoor (eds.), Lexical and syntactical constructions and the construction of meaning, 329-346. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
35. Nakamura, Tsuguro. 1997. Actions in motion: How languages express manners of motion. In Masatomo Ukaji, Toshio Nakao, Masaru Kajita & Shuji Chiba (eds.), Studies in English linguistics : A Festschrift for Akira Ota on the occasion of his eightieth birthday, 723-738. Tokyo: Taishukan.
36. Özçalişkan, Şeyda & Dan I. Slobin. 2003. Codability effects on the expression of manner of motion in Turkish and English. In A. Sumru Özsoy, Didar Akar, Mine Nakipoglu-Demiralp, Eser Erguvanli-Taylan & Ayhan Aksu-Koç (eds.), Studies in Turkish linguistics, 259-270. Istanbul: Boǧaziçi University Press.
37. Parsons, Terence. 1990. Events in the semantics of English: A study in subatomic semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Pustejovsky, James & Frederica Busa. 1995. Unaccusativity and event composition. In Pier Marco Bertinetto, Valentina Bianchi, James Higginbotham & Mario Squartini (eds.), Temporal reference, aspect, and actionality, vol. 1: Semantic and syntactic perspectives, 159-177. Turin: Rosenberg and Sellier.
39. Sadakane, Kumi & Masatoshi Koizumi. 1995. On the nature of the 'dative' particle ni in Japanese. Linguistics 33, 5-33.
40. Schütze, Carson. 1995. PP attachment and argumenthood. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 26: Papers in language processing and acquisition, 95-151.
41. Slobin, Dan I. 1996. Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning, 195-219. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Slobin, Dan I. 2004. The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In Sven Strömqvist & Ludo Verhoeven (eds.), Relating events in narrative 2: Typological and contextual perspectives, 219-257. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43. Slobin, Dan I. & Nini Hoiting. 1994. Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: Typological considerations. BLS 20, 487-505.
44. Sorace, Antonella. 1993. Incomplete versus divergent representations of unaccusative grammars of Italian. Second LanguageResearch 9, 22-48.
45. Sorace, Antonella. 1995. Acquiring linking rules and argument structures in a second langauge: The unaccusative/unergative distinction. In Lynn Eubank, Larry Selinker & Michael Sharwood Smith (eds.), The current state of interlanguage, 79-113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
46. Sorace, Antonella. 2000. Gradients in auxiliary selection with intransitive verbs. Language 76, 859-890.
47. Sorace, Antonella & Yoko Shomura. 2001. Lexical constraints on the acquisition of split intransitivity: Evidence from L2 Japanese. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23, 247-278.
48. Stringer, David. 2003. Acquisitional evidence for a universal syntax of directional PPs. Conference booklet of ACLSIGSEM workshop: The linguistic dimensions of prepositions and their use in computational linguistics formalisms and applications, 44-55. Toulouse: IRIT.
49. Stringer, David. 2006. Typological tendencies and universal grammar in the acquisition of adpositions. In Patrick Saint-Dizier (ed.), Syntax and semantics of prepositions, 57-68. Dordrecht: Springer.
50. Talmy, Leonard. 1975. Semantics and syntax of motion. In John P. Kimball (ed.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 4, 181-238. New York: Academic Press.
51. Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 57-149. New York: Cambridge University Press.
52. Talmy, Leonard. 1991. Path to realization - via aspect and result. BLS 17, 480-519.
53. Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54. Tanaka, Eri. 2002. Event composition and path in Japanese. WECOL 12. Vancouver, B.C.: University of British Columbia.
55. Tenny, Carol. 1992. The aspectual interface hypothesis. In Ivan A. Sag & Anna Szabolcsi (eds.), Lexical matters, 490-508. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
56. Tenny, Carol. 1994. Aspectual roles and the syntax-semantic interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
57. Tsujimura, Natsuko. 1994. Unaccusative mismatches and resultatives in Japanese. In Masatoshi Koizumi & Hiroyuki Ura (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 24: Formal approaches to Japanese linguistics 1, 335-354.
58. Tsujimura, Natsuko. 1996. An introduction to Japanese linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
59. Tsujimura, Natsuko. 2002. Japanese enter/exit verbs revisited. Studies in Language 26, 165-180.
60. Tsujimura, Natsuko. 2003. Event cancellation and telicity. In Michael McClure (ed.), Japanese/Korean linguistics 12, 388-399. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
61. Tsujimura, Natsuko. To appear. Motion verbs, telicity, and argument projection. In Mutsuko Endo Hudson, Peter Sells & Sun-ah Jun (eds.), Japanese/Korean linguistics 13. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
62. Washio, Ryuichi. 1997. Resultatives, compositionality, and language variation. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 6, 1-49.
63. Wechsler, Stephen. 2001. An analysis of English resultatives under the event-argument homomorphism model of telicity, 1-15. The 3rd Workshop on Text Structure, The University of Texas, Austin.
64. Wechsler, Stephen. 2003. Serial verbs and serial motion. In Dorothee Beermann & Lars Hellan (eds.), The Workshop on Multi-verb Constructions, 1-27. Trondheim: Trondheim Summer School, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
65. Wechsler, Stephen. 2005. Resultatives under the 'event-argument homomorphism' model of telicity. In Nomi Erteschik-Shir & Tova Rapoport (eds.), The syntax of aspect, 255-273. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
66. Wienold, Götz. 1995. Lexical and conceptual structures in expressions for movement and space: With reference to Japanese, Korean, Thai, and Indonesian as compared to English and German. In Urs Egli, Peter E. Pause, Cristoph Schwarze, Arnim von Stechow & Götz Wienold (eds.), Lexical knowledge in the organization of language, 301-340. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
67. Yoneyama, Mitsuaki. 1986. Motion verbs in conceptual semantics. Bulletin of the Faculty of Humanities 22, 1-15. Tokyo: Seikei University.
68. Zaenen, Annie. 1993. Unaccusativity in Dutch: Integrating syntax and lexical semantics. In James Pustejovsky (ed.), Semantics and the lexicon, 129-162. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
69. Zlatev, Jordan & Peerapat Yangklang. 2004. A third way to travel: The place of Thai in motion-event typology. In Sven Strömqvist & Ludo Verhoeven (eds.), Relating events in narrative 2: Typological and contextual perspectives, 159-190. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.