Effects of deafening and cochlear implantation procedures on postimplantation psychophysical electrical detection thresholds

Hearing Research

Volumn 241, Issue 1-2, 2008, Pages 64-72

  Su, Gina L ^a   Colesa, Deborah J ^a   Pfingst, Bryan E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Animal psychophysics; Cochlear implant; Electrical detection threshold; Guinea pig; Impedance; Neomycin deafening

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEA; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; GUINEA PIG; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; IMPEDANCE; IMPLANT; IMPLANTATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE TESTS; ANIMALS; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; GUINEA PIGS; HAIR CELLS, AUDITORY; SCALA TYMPANI; SIGNAL DETECTION (PSYCHOLOGY); TIME FACTORS;

EID: 45649085604     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.04.011     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Dodson H.C. Loss and survival of spiral ganglion neurons in the guinea pig after intracochlear perfusion with aminoglycosides. J. Neurocytol. 26 (1997) 541-556
2. Duckert L.G. Morphological changes in the normal and neomycin-perfused guinea pig cochlea following chronic prosthetic implantation. Laryngoscope 93 (1983) 841-855
3. Eddington D.K., Dobelle W.H., Brackmann D.E., Mladejovsky M.G., and Parkin J.L. Auditory prosthesis research with multiple channel intracochlear stimulation in man. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. (St. Louis) 87 (1978) 1-39
4. Hu N., Abbas P.J., Miller C.A., Robinson B.K., Nourski K.V., Jeng F., Abkes B.A., and Nichols J.M. Auditory response to intracochlear electric stimuli following furosemide treatment. Hear. Res. 185 (2003) 77-89
5. Irvine D.R.F., and Rajan R. Plasticity in the frequency organization of auditory cortex of adult mammals with restricted cochlear lesions. Biomed. Res. 14 Suppl. 4 (1993) 55-59
6. Juiz J., Rueda J., and Merchan J.A. Reversible damage to the nerve fibres in the organ of Corti after surgical opening of the cochlea in the rat. Acta Otolaryngol. (Stockh) 106 (1988) 29-33
7. Kawano A., Seldon H.L., Clark G.M., Ramsden R.T., and Raine C.H. Intracochlear factors contributing to psychophysical percepts following cochlear implantation. Acta OtoLaryngol. (Stockh) 118 (1998) 313-326
8. Kim Y.H., and Raphael Y. Cell division and maintenance of epithelial integrity in the deafened auditory epithelium. Cell Cycle 6 (2007) 612-619
9. Leake-Jones P.A., O'Reilly B.F., and Vivion M.C. Neomycin ototoxicity: ultrastructural surface pathology of the organ of corti. Scanning Microsc. 3 (1980) 426-434
10. Michelson R.P. Electrical stimulation of the human cochlea: a preliminary report. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 93 (1971) 317-323
11. Middlebrooks J.C., and Snyder R.L. Auditory prosthesis with a penetrating nerve array. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 8 (2007) 258-279
12. Miller A.L. Effects of chronic stimulation on auditory nerve survival in ototoxically deafened animals. Hear. Res. 151 (2001) 1-14
13. Miller A.L., Morris D.J., and Pfingst B.E. Effects of time after deafening and implantation on guinea pig electrical detection thresholds. Hear. Res. 144 (2000) 175-186
14. Miller C.A., Woodruff K.E., and Pfingst B.E. Functional responses from guinea pigs with cochlear implants. I. Electrophysiological and psychophysical measures. Hear. Res. 92 (1995) 89-99
15. Newbold C., Richardson R., Huang C.Q., Milojevic D., Cowan R., and Shepherd R. An in vitro model for investigating impedance changes with cell growth and electrical stimulation: implications for cochlear implants. J. Neural. Eng. 1 (2004) 218-227
16. Nuttall A.L., Marques D.M., and Lawrence M. Effects of perilymphatic perfusion with neomycint on the cochlear microphonic potential in the guinea pig. Acta Otolaryngol. (Stockh) 83 (1977) 393-400
17. Patrick J.F., Crosby P.A., Hirshorn M.S., Kuzma J.A., Money D.K., Ridler J., and Seligman P.M. Australian multi-channel implantable hearing prosthesis. In: Schindler R.A., and Merzenich M.M. (Eds). Cochlear Implants (1985), Raven Press, New York 93-100
18. Pfingst B.E. Changes over time in thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Hear. Res. 50 (1990) 225-236
19. Pfingst B.E., Donaldson J.A., Miller J.M., and Spelman F.A. Psychophysical evaluation of cochlear prostheses in a monkey model. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. (St. Louis) 88 (1979) 613-625
20. Pfingst B.E., Sutton D., Miller J.M., and Bohne B.A. Relation of psychophysical data to histopathology in monkeys with cochlear implants. Acta Otolaryngol. (Stockh) 92 (1981) 1-13
21. Skinner M.W., Binzer S.M., Holden L.K., and Holden T.A. Hearing changes in adults with cochlear implants. Semin. Hear (1995) 228-238
22. Snyder R.L., Rebscher S.J., Cao K., Leake P.A., and Kelly K. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in the neonatally deafened cat. I. Expansion of central representation. Hear. Res. 50 (1990) 7-33