Congruence of in Vivo and in Vitro Insertion Patterns in Hot E. coli Gene Targets of Transposable Element Mu: Opposing Roles of MuB in Target Capture and Integration

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 380, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 598-607

  Ge, Jun ^a   Harshey, Rasika M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Mu DNA transposition; MuA transposase; MuB filament; target site selection

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL DNA; BACTERIAL PROTEIN; MUA PROTEIN; MUB PROTEIN; TRANSPOSASE;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GENOME; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA STRUCTURE; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; TRANSPOSON;

ENTEROBACTERIA PHAGE MU; ESCHERICHIA COLI;

EID: 45649084701     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.05.032     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Craig N.L. Target site selection in transposition. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 66 (1997) 437-474
2. Sandmeyer S. Targeting transposition: at home in the genome. Genome Res. 8 (1998) 416-418
3. Taylor A.L. Bacteriophage-induced mutations in E. coli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 50 (1963) 1043-1051
4. Bukhari A.I., and Zipser D. Random insertion of Mu-1 DNA within a single gene. Nature New Biol. 236 (1972) 240-243
5. Castilho B.A., and Casadaban M.J. Specificity of mini-Mu bacteriophage insertions in a small plasmid. J. Bacteriol. 173 (1991) 1339-1343
6. Wang X., and Higgins N.P. 'Muprints' of the lac operon demonstrate physiological control over the randomness of in vivo transposition. Mol. Microbiol. 12 (1994) 665-677
7. Manna D., Wang X., and Higgins N.P. Mu and IS1 transpositions exhibit strong orientation bias at the Escherichia coli bgl locus. J. Bacteriol. 183 (2001) 3328-3335
8. Manna D., Breier A.M., and Higgins N.P. Microarray analysis of transposition targets in Escherichia coli: the impact of transcription. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101 (2004) 9780-9785
9. Manna D., Deng S., Breier A.M., and Higgins N.P. Bacteriophage Mu targets the trinucleotide sequence CGG. J. Bacteriol. 187 (2005) 3586-3588
10. Mizuuchi M., and Mizuuchi K. Target site selection in transposition of phage Mu. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 58 (1993) 515-523
11. Haapa-Paananen S., Rita H., and Savilahti H. DNA transposition of bacteriophage Mu. A quantitative analysis of target site selection in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 277 (2002) 2843-2851
12. Chaconas G., and Harshey R.M. Transposition of phage Mu DNA. In: Craig N.L., Craigie R., Gellert M., and Lambowitz A.M. (Eds). Mobile DNA II (2002), ASM Press, Washington, DC 384-402
13. Adzuma K., and Mizuuchi K. Steady-state kinetic analysis of ATP hydrolysis by the B protein of bacteriophage Mu. Involvement of protein oligomerization in the ATPase cycle. J. Biol. Chem. 266 (1991) 6159-6167
14. Greene E.C., and Mizuuchi K. Visualizing the assembly and disassembly mechanisms of the MuB transposition targeting complex. J. Biol. Chem. 279 (2004) 16736-16743
15. Greene E.C., and Mizuuchi K. Dynamics of a protein polymer: the assembly and disassembly pathways of the MuB transposition target complex. EMBO J. 21 (2002) 1477-1486
16. Leung P.C., and Harshey R.M. Two mutations of phage Mu transposase that affect strand transfer or interactions with B protein lie in distinct polypeptide domains. J. Mol. Biol. 219 (1991) 189-199
17. Greene E.C., and Mizuuchi K. Direct observation of single MuB polymers: evidence for a DNA-dependent conformational change for generating an active target complex. Mol. Cell 9 (2002) 1079-1089
18. Yamauchi M., and Baker T.A. An ATP-ADP switch in MuB controls progression of the Mu transposition pathway. EMBO J. 17 (1998) 5509-5518
19. Adzuma K., and Mizuuchi K. Target immunity of Mu transposition reflects a differential distribution of Mu B protein. Cell 53 (1988) 257-266
20. Greene E.C., and Mizuuchi K. Target immunity during Mu DNA transposition. Transpososome assembly and DNA looping enhance MuA-mediated disassembly of the MuB target complex. Mol. Cell 10 (2002) 1367-1378
21. Manna D., Porwollik S., McClelland M., Tan R., and Higgins N.P. Microarray analysis of Mu transposition in Salmonella enterica, serovar Typhimurium: transposon exclusion by high-density DNA binding proteins. Mol. Microbiol. 66 (2007) 315-328
22. Tan X., Mizuuchi M., and Mizuuchi K. DNA transposition target immunity and the determinants of the MuB distribution patterns on DNA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104 (2007) 13925-13929
23. Craig N.L. Tn7: a target site-specific transposon. Mol. Microbiol. 5 (1991) 2569-2573
24. Boeke J.D., and Devine S.E. Yeast retrotransposons: finding a nice quiet neighborhood. Cell 93 (1998) 1087-1089
25. Wang G.P., Ciuffi A., Leipzig J., Berry C.C., and Bushman F.D. HIV integration site selection: analysis by massively parallel pyrosequencing reveals association with epigenetic modifications. Genome Res. 17 (2007) 1186-1194
26. Peters J.E., and Craig N.L. Tn7 transposes proximal to DNA double-strand breaks and into regions where chromosomal DNA replication terminates. Mol. Cell 6 (2000) 573-582
27. Liao G.C., Rehm E.J., and Rubin G.M. Insertion site preferences of the P transposable element in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97 (2000) 3347-3351
28. Bender J., and Kleckner N. Tn10 insertion specificity is strongly dependent upon sequences immediately adjacent to the target-site consensus sequence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89 (1992) 7996-8000
29. Pribil P.A., and Haniford D.B. Substrate recognition and induced DNA deformation by transposase at the target-capture stage of Tn10 transposition. J. Mol. Biol. 303 (2000) 145-159
30. Ge, J. (2007). A general linear mixed model for bacteriophage Mu transposition target preference. MA in Statistics, University of Texas.
31. Bell C.E. Structure and mechanism of Escherichia coli RecA ATPase. Mol. Microbiol. 58 (2005) 358-366
32. Au T.K., Agrawal P., and Harshey R.M. Chromosomal integration mechanism of infecting Mu virion DNA. J. Bacteriol. 188 (2006) 1829-1834
33. Yang J.Y., Kim K., Jayaram M., and Harshey R.M. Domain sharing model for active site assembly within the Mu a tetramer during transposition: the enhancer may specify domain contributions. EMBO J. 14 (1995) 2374-2384
34. Pathania S., Jayaram M., and Harshey R.M. Path of DNA within the Mu transpososome. Transposase interactions bridging two Mu ends and the enhancer trap five DNA supercoils. Cell 109 (2002) 425-436
35. Lee I., and Harshey R.M. Importance of the conserved CA dinucleotide at Mu termini. J. Mol. Biol. 314 (2001) 433-444
36. Grainger D.C., Overton T.W., Reppas N., Wade J.T., Tamai E., Hobman J.L., et al. Genomic studies with Escherichia coli MelR protein: applications of chromatin immunoprecipitation and microarrays. J. Bacteriol. 186 (2004) 6938-6943