Erratum to "Evaluation of HDR tone mapping methods using essential perceptual attributes" [Comput. Graph. 32(3) (2008) 330-349] (DOI:10.1016/j.cag.2008.04.003);Evaluation of HDR tone mapping methods using essential perceptual attributes

Computers and Graphics (Pergamon)

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 330-349

  Čadík, Martin ^a   Wimmer, Michael ^b   Neumann, Laszlo ^c   Artusi, Alessandro ^d  

^a CZECH TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY IN PRAGUE   (Czech Republic)

^b VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GIRONA   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Evaluation of methods; High dynamic range; Image attributes; Psychophysics; Subjective testing; Tone mapping; Visual perception

Indexed keywords

COLOR VISION; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; IMAGE PROCESSING; SUBJECTIVE TESTING;

EVALUATION OF METHODS; HIGH DYNAMIC RANGE; IMAGE ATTRIBUTES; PSYCHOPHYSICS; TONE MAPPING; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

MAPPING;

EID: 45449091723     PISSN: 00978493     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cag.2008.07.007     Document Type: Erratum

References (59)

1. Devlin K., Chalmers A., Wilkie A., and Purgathofer W. Star: tone reproduction and physically based spectral rendering. In: Fellner D., and Scopignio R. (Eds). State of the art reports, eurographics 2002 (2002), The Eurographics Association 101-123
2. Reinhard E., Ward L.G., Pattanaik S., and Debevec P. High dynamic range imaging: acquisition, display, and image-based lighting (2005), Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, CA
3. Čadík M, Slavík P. The naturalness of reproduced high dynamic range images. In: Proceedings of the ninth international conference on information visualisation, Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society; 2005. p. 920-5.
4. Drago F, Martens WL, Myszkowski K, Seidel, H-P. Perceptual evaluation of tone mapping operators. In: Proceedings of the SIGGRAPH 2003 conference on sketches & applications, GRAPH '03, New York, NY, USA: ACM Press; 2003. p. 1.
5. Yoshida A, Blanz V, Myszkowski K, Seidel, H-P. Perceptual evaluation of tone mapping operators with real-world scenes. Human Vision & Electronic Imaging X, San Jose, CA, USA: SPIE;2005. p. 192-203.
6. Kuang J, Yamaguchi H, Johnson GM, Fairchild MD. Testing HDR image rendering algorithms. In: Color imaging conference. 2004. p. 315-20.
7. Kuang, J, Johnson, GM, Fairchild MD. Image preference scaling for HDR image rendering. In: Thirteenth color imaging conference. Scottsdale, Arizona. 2005. p. 8-13.
8. Kuang J, Liu C, Johnson, GM, Fairchild MD. Evaluation of HDR image rendering algorithms using real-world scenes. In: International congress of imaging science, ICIS0́6. 2006.
9. Durand F, Dorsey J. Fast bilateral filtering for the display of high-dynamic-range images. In: Proceedings of the 29th annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques. New York, NY, USA: ACM Press; 2002. p. 257-66.
10. Kuang J., Yamaguchi H., Liu C., Johnson G.M., and Fairchild M.D. Evaluating HDR rendering algorithms. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 4 2 (2007) 9
11. Ashikhmin M., and Goyal J. A reality check for tone-mapping operators. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 3 4 (2006) 399-411
12. Ledda P, Chalmers A, Troscianko T, Seetzen H. Evaluation of tone mapping operators using a high dynamic range display. In: Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques, SIGGRAPH '05. ACM Press; 2005, p. 640-8.
13. Yoshida A., Mantiuk R., Myszkowski K., and Seidel H.-P. Analysis of reproducing real-world appearance on displays of varying dynamic range. Computer Graphics Forum 25 3 (2006) 415-426
14. Akyüz AO, Fleming R, Riecke BE, Reinhard E, Bülthoff HH. Do HDR displays support LDR content? A psychophysical evaluation. ACM Transactions on Graphics 2007;26(3).
15. Janssen R, Computational image quality. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE), 2001.
16. Rogowitz BE, Frese T, Smith, JR, Bouman, CA, Kalin, EB. Perceptual image similarity experiments. In: Rogowitz BE, Pappas TN, editors. Proceedings of the SPIE, human vision and electronic imaging III, vol. 3299. 1998, p. 576-90.
17. Fedorovskaya E., de Ridder H., and Blommaert F. Chroma variations and perceived quality of color images of natural scenes. Color Research & Application 22 2 (1997) 96-110
18. Savakis A., Etz S., Loui A., et al. Evaluation of image appeal in consumer photography. Proceedings of the SPIE 3959 (2000) 111-120
19. Jobson D, Rahman Z, Woodell G. The statistics of visual representation. In: Rahman Z, Schowengerdt RA, Reichenbach SE editors. Visual information processing XI, 2002, p. 25-35.
20. Mantiuk R, Seidel HP. Modeling a generic tone-mapping operator. Computer Graphics Forum 2008;27(2), in press.
21. Čadík M, Wimmer M, Neumann L, Artusi A. Image attributes and quality for evaluation of tone mapping operators. In: Proceedings of pacific graphics 2006. Taipei, Taiwan: National Taiwan University Press; 2006. p. 35-44.
22. Neumann L, Neumann A. Gradient domain imaging. First EG workshop on computational aesthetics in graphics, imaging and visualization, 2005.
23. Adelson E.H. Lightness perception and lightness illusions. In: Gazzaniga M. (Ed). The cognitive neurosciences (1999), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 339-351
24. Wyszecki G., and Stiles W.S. Color science, concepts and methods: quantitative data and formulae. 2nd ed. (1982), Wiley, New York ISBN 0-471-02106-7.
25. Fairchild M.D. Color appearance models. 2nd ed. (2005), Wiley-IS&T, Chichester, UK
26. Tumblin J., and Rushmeier H. Tone reproduction for realistic images. IEEE Computers Graphics and Applications 13 6 (1993) 42-48
27. Krawczyk G, Myszkowski K, Seidel, H-P. Computational model of lightness perception in high dynamic range imaging. In: Rogowitz BE, Pappas TN, Daly SJ editors. Human vision and electronic imaging XI, IS&T/SPIE's 18th annual symposium on electronic imaging (2006). 2006. p. 1-12.
28. Winkler S. Vision models and quality metrics for image processing applications, PhD thesis, EPFL, December 2000.
29. Matkovic K, Neumann L, Neumann A, Psik T, Purgathofer W. Global contrast factor-a new approach to image contrast. In: Neumann L, Sbert M, Gooch B, Purgathofer W editors. Computational aesthetics in graphics, visualization and imaging 2005. Eurographics Association; 2005. p. 159-68.
30. Ward L.G. A contrast-based scalefactor for luminance display. Graphics Gems IV (1994) 415-421
31. CIE, An analytical model for describing the influence of lighting parameters upon visual performance. vol. 1: technical foundations. CIE 19/2.1. International organization for standardization, 1981.
32. Ferwerda J.A., Pattanaik S.N., Shirley P., and Greenberg D.P. A model of visual adaptation for realistic image synthesis. Computer Graphics 30 (1996) 249-258 (Annual Conference Series)
33. Ward L.G., Rushmeier H., and Piatko C. A visibility matching tone reproduction operator for high dynamic range scenes. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 3 4 (1997) 291-306
34. Reinhard E, Stark M, Shirley P, Ferwerda J. Photographic tone reproduction for digital images. In: Proceedings of the 29th annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques. ACM Press; 2002. p. 267-76.
35. Ashikhmin M. A tone mapping algorithm for high contrast images. In: 13th eurographics workshop on rendering. Eurographics Association; 2002. p. 145-56.
36. Peli E. Contrast in complex images. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 7 10 (1990) 2032-2040
37. Mantiuk R, Myszkowski K, Seidel H-P. A perceptual framework for contrast processing of high dynamic range images. In: Proceedings of the 2nd symposium on applied perception in graphics and visualization, APGV '05, New York, NY, USA: ACM Press; 2005. p. 87-94.
38. Fattal R, Lischinski D, Werman M. Gradient domain high dynamic range compression. In: Proceedings of the 29th annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques. New York, NY, USA: ACM Press; 2002. p. 249-56.
39. Pattanaik SN, Ferwerda JA, Fairchild MD, Greenberg DP. A multiscale model of adaptation and spatial vision for realistic image display. In: Proceedings of the 25th annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques. New York, NY, USA: ACM Press; 1998. p. 287-98.
40. Reinhard E, Devlin K. Dynamic range reduction inspired by photoreceptor physiology. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 2005;11(1):13-24.
41. Tumblin J, Turk G. Low curvature image simplifiers (LCIS). In: SIGGRAPH 99 conference proceedings. Annual conference series. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley; 1999. pp. 83-90.
42. Choudhury P, Tumblin J. The trilateral filter for high contrast images and meshes. In: Proceedings of the 14th eurographics workshop on rendering, eurographics association, EGRW '03, 2003. p. 186-96.
43. Chiu K, Herf M, Shirley P, Swamy S, Wang C, Zimmerman K. Spatially nonuniform scaling functions for high contrast images. In: Proceedings of graphics interface '93. 1993. p. 245- 53.
44. Schlick C. An adaptive sampling technique for multidimensional ray tracing. In: Brunet P., and Jansen F.W. (Eds). Photorealistic rendering in computer graphics (1994), Springer, Berlin 21-29
45. Spencer G, Shirley P, Zimmerman K, Greenberg DP. Physically-based glare effects for digital images. In: Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques. ACM Press; 1995. p. 325-34.
46. Calabria A.J., and Fairchild M.D. Perceived image contrast and observer preference I: the effects of lightness, chroma, and sharpness manipulations on contrast perception. Journal of Imaging Science & Technology 47 (2003) 479-493
47. Debevec PE, Malik J. Recovering high dynamic range radiance maps from photographs. In: Whitted T editor. SIGGRAPH 97 conference proceedings. Annual conference series, vol. 31 ACM SIGGRAPH, Reading, MA: Addison Wesley; 1997. p. 369-78. ISBN 0-89791-896-7.
48. Drago F, Myszkowski K, Annen T, Chiba N. Adaptive logarithmic mapping for displaying high contrast scenes. Computer Graphics Forum 2003;22(3).
49. Pattanaik S, Yee H. Adaptive gain control for high dynamic range image display. In: Proceedings of 18th spring conference on computer graphics, ACM Press; SCCG '02: 2002. p. 83-7.
50. Tumblin J., Hodgins J.K., and Guenter B.K. Two methods for display of high contrast images. ACM Transactions on Graphics 18 1 (1999) 56-94
51. Thurstone L.L. A law of comparative judgement. Psychological Review 34 (1927) 278-286
52. Torgerson W.S. Theory and methods of scaling (1958), Wiley, New York, NY, USA
53. Siegel S., and Castellan N.J. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. (1988), McGraw-Hill, London
54. Lehmacher W., and Wall K.D. A new nonparametric approach to the comparison of k independent samples of response curves. Biometrical Journal 20 (1978) 261-273
55. Rencher AC. Methods of multivariate analysis. 2nd Ed. Wiley series in probability and statistics, 2002.
56. Anderson M.J., and ter Braak C.J.F. Permutation tests for multi-factorial analysis of variance. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 73 (2003) 85-113
57. Tabachnick B.G., and Fidell L.S. Using multivariate statistics. 5th ed. (2007), Pearson Education, Inc.
58. Fairchild MD, Johnson GM, Kuang J, Yamaguchi H. Image appearance modeling and high-dynamic-range image rendering. In: Proceedings of the 1st symposium on applied perception in graphics and visualization, APGV '04, New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2004. p. 171.
59. Čadík M. Perception motivated hybrid approach to tone mapping. In: Proceedings of WSCG (Full Papers). 2007. p. 129-36.