Perceptual evaluation of tone mapping operators with real-world scenes

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Volumn 5666, Issue , 2005, Pages 192-203

  Yoshida, Akiko ^a   Blanz, Volker ^a   Myszkowski, Karol ^a   Seidel, Hans Peter ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR INFORMATICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

ANOVA; Correlation; High dynamic range (HDR) images; Human visual systems (HVS); Mahalanobis distances; MANOVA; Psychophysics; Tone mapping

Indexed keywords

COLOR VISION; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; CORRELATION METHODS; DISPLAY DEVICES; MAPPING; MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS; PHOTOGRAPHY; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY;

ANOVA; HIGH DYNAMIC RANGE (HDR) IMAGES; HUMAN VISUAL SYSTEMS (HVS); MAHALANOBIS DISTANCES; MANOVA; PSYCHOPHYSICS; TONE MAPPING;

IMAGE PROCESSING;

EID: 21944453691     PISSN: 0277786X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.587782     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (41)

1. Stéphane Albin, Gilles Rougeron, Bernard Péroche, and Alain Trémeau. Quality image metrics for synthetic images based on perceptual color differences. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 11(9):961-971, September 2002.
2. Michael Ashikhmin. A tone mapping algorithm for high contrast images. In P. Debevec and S. Gibson, editors, 13th Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, pages 145-155, Pisa, Italy, 2002. The Eurographics Association.
3. İsmail Avcibaş and Bülent Sankur. Statistical analysis of image quality measures. In Proceedings European Signal Processing Conference 2000, pages 2181-2184, September 2000.
4. İsmail Avcibaş, Bülent Sankur, and Khalid Sayood. Statistical evaluation of image quality measures. Journal of Electronic Imaging, 11(2):206-223, April 2002.
5. Alexander Bornik, Peter Cech, Andrej Ferko, and Roland Perko. Beyond image quality comparison. In M. Chover, H. Hagen, and D. Tost, editors, Eurographics 2003 Short Presentations, pages 263-272. The Eurographics Association 2003, 2003.
6. Scott Daly. Digital Images and Human Vision, chapter 14: The Visible Differences Predictor: An Algorithm for the Assessment of Image Fidelity, pages 179-206. MIT Press, 1993. ISBN: 0-262-23171-9.
7. Paul E. Debevec and Jitendra Malik. Recovering high dynamic range radiance maps from photographs. In Turner Whitted, editor, SIGGRAPH 97 Conference Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, pages 369-378. ACM SIGGRAPH, Addison Wesley, August 1997. ISBN 0-89791-896-7.
8. Kate Devlin, Alan Chalmers, Alexander Wilkie, and Werner Purgathofer. Tone reproduction and physically based spectral rendering. In Dieter Fellner and Roberto Scopignio, editors, State of the Art Reports, Eurographics, pages 101-123. The Eurographics Association, September 2002.
9. Frédéric Drago, Karol Myszkowski, Thomas Annen, and Norishige Chiba. Adaptive logarithmic mapping for displaying high contrast scenes. In P. Brunet and D. Fellner, editors, Proceedings of Eurographics, pages 419-426, 2003.
10. Frédo Durand and Julie Dorsey. Fast bilateral filtering for The display of high-dynamic-range images. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2002, Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, 2002.
11. Ahmet M. Eskicioglu and Paul S. Fisher. Image quality measures and their performance. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 43(12):2959-2965, December 1995.
12. James A. Ferwerda, Sumanta Pattanaik, Peter Shirley, and Donald P. Greenberg. A model of visual adaptation for realistic image synthesis. In Holly Rushmeier, editor, SIGGRAPH 96 Conference Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, pages 249-258. ACM SIGGRAPH, Addison Wesley, August 1996.
13. Thomas Frese, Charles A. Bouman, and Jan. P. Allebach. A methodology for designing image similarity metrics based on human visual system models. In Proceedings of SPIE on Human Vision and Electronic Imaging II, volume 3016, pages 472-483, 1997.
14. Alan Gilchrist, Christos Kossyfidis, Frederick Bonato, Tiziano Agostini, Joseph Cataliotti, Xiaojun Li, Branka Spehar, Vidal Annan, and Elias Economou. An anchoring theory of lightness perception. Psychological Review, 106(4):795-834, 1999.
15. Warren B. Jackson, Maya R. Said, David A. Jared, James O. Larimer, Jennifer L. Gille, and Jeffrey Lubin. Evaluation of human vision models for predicting human-observer performance. In Harold L. Kundel, editor, Medical Imaging 1997: Image Perception, Proceedings of SPIE, volume 3036, pages 64-73, April 1997.
16. Ruud Janssen. Computational Image Quality. SPIE Press, Bellingham, WA 97227-0010, USA, 2001. ISBN 0-8194-4132-5.
17. KONICA MINOLTA, Inc. http://konicaminolta.com/.
18. Yung-Kai Lai and C.-C. Jay Kuo. Image quality measurement using the haar wavelet. In Proceedings of SPIE, volume 3169, 1997.
19. David E.B. Lees and Philip D. Henshaw. Printed circuit board inspection - a novel approach. In Proceedings of the International Society for Optical Engineering, volume 730, pages 164-173, 1987.
20. Gian Paolo Lorenzetto and Peter Kovesi. A phase based image comparison technique. In Proceedings of DICTA '99, 1999.
21. Math Works, Inc. MATLAB. http://www.mathworks.com/.
22. Ann McNamara. Visual perception in realistic image synthesis. Computer Graphics Forum, 20(4):211-224, 2001.
23. Tomoo Mitsunaga and Shree K. Nayar. Radiometric self calibration. In Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, June 1999.
24. Guy R. Newsham, Helge Seetzen, and Jennifer A. Veitch. Lighting quality evaluations using images on a high dynamic range display. In Proceedings of the ARCC/EAAE Conference on Architectural Research, pages 1-9, May 2002.
25. M. Nijenhuis, R. Hamberg, C. Teunissen, S. Bech, H. Looren de Jong, P. Houben, and S. K. Pramanik. Sharpness, sharpness related attributes, and their physical correlates. In Proceedings of SPIE, volume 3025, pages 173-184, 1997.
26. Wilfried Osberger, Anthony J. Maeder, and Donald McLean. A computational model of the human visual system for image quality assessment. In Proceedings DICTA-97, pages 337-342, Auckland, New Zealand, December 1997.
27. Sumanta N. Pattanaik, Jack E. Tumblin, Hector Yee, and Donald P. Greenberg. Time-dependent visual adaptation for realistic image display. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2000, Annual Conference Series, pages 47-54. ACM Press/ACM SIGGRAPH/Addison Wesley Longman, July 2000. ISBN 1-58113-208-5.
28. Karl Pearson. Regression, heredity, and panmixia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, A(187):253-318, 1896.
29. K. Perlin and E.M. Hoffert. Hypertexture. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 89, volume 23, pages 253-262, 1989.
30. Erik Reinhard. Parameter estimation for photographic tone reproduction. Journal of Graphics Tools, 7(1):45-51, January 2003.
31. Erik Reinhard, Michael Stark, Peter Shirley, and Jim Ferwerda. Photographic tone reproduction for digital images. In SIGGRAPH 2002 Conference Proceedings. ACM SIGGRAPH, Addison Wesley, August 2002.
32. Mark A. Robertson, Sean Borman, and Robert L. Stevenson. Dynamic range improvement through multiple exposures. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, October 1999.
33. Barbara G. Tabachnick. Using multivariate statistics. Harper Collins Publishers, Inc., 2nd edition, 1989. ISBN 0-06-046571-9.
34. Jack Tumblin and Holly E. Rushmeier. Tone reproduction for realistic images. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 13(6):42-48, November 1993.
35. Zhou Wang and Alan C. Bovik. A universal image quality index. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 9(3):81-84, March 2002.
36. Greg Ward. A contrast-based scalefactor for luminance display. Graphics Gems IV, pages 415-421, 1994.
37. Greg Ward. Fast, robust image registration for compositing high dynamic range photographcs from hand-held exposures. Journal of Graphics Tools, 8(2):17-30, 2003.
38. Gregory Ward Larson, Holly Rushmeier, and Christine Piatko. A Visibility Matching Tone Reproduction Operator for High Dynamic Range Scenes. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 3(4):291-306, 1997.
39. Benjamin Watson, Alinda Friedman, and Aaron McGaffey. Measuring and predicting visual fidelity. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2001, Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, pages 213-220. ACM Press/ACM SIGGRAPH/Addison Wesley Longman, 2001.
40. Dale L. Wilson, Adrian J. Baddeley, and Robyn A. Owens. A new metric for grey-scale comparison. International Journal of Computer Vision, 24(1):5-17, 1997.
41. Hualinn Zhou, Min Chen, and Mike F. Webster. Comparative evaluation of visualization and experimental results using image comparison metrics. IEEE Visualization, 2002.