An analysis of perceptions from changes in optical size

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 60, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 805-820

  Gogel, Walter C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY;

HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; SIZE PERCEPTION;

EID: 0032113535     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03206064     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. EDWARDS, M., & BABCOCK, D. R. (1993). Asymmetries in the sensitivity to motion in depth: A centripetal bias. Perception, 22, 1013-1023.
2. FOLEY, J. M. (1965). Visual space: A scale of perceived relative direction. Proceedings of the Seventy-Third Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 1, 49-50.
3. FOLEY, J. M. (1967). Binocular disparity and perceived relative distance: An examination of two hypotheses. Vision Research, 1, 655-670.
4. FOLEY, J. M. (1968). Depth, size and distance in stereoscopic vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 133-149.
5. FOLEY, J. M. (1972). The size-distance relation and intrinsic geometry of visual space: Implications for processing. Vision Research, 12, 323-332.
6. FOLEY, J. M. (1991). Binocular space perception. In D. M. Regan (Ed.), Vision and visual dysfunction: Binocular vision and psychophysics (Vol. 9, pp. 75-91). New York: Macmillan.
7. GOGEL, W. C. (1964). The perception of depth from binocular disparity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 379-386.
8. GOGEL, W. C. (1969). The effect of object familiarity on the perception of size and distance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21, 239-247.
9. GOGEL, W. C. (1971). The validity of the size-distance invariance hypothesis with cue reduction. Perception & Psychophysics, 9, 92-94.
10. GOGEL, W. C. (1976). An indirect method of measuring perceived distance from familiar size. Perception & Psychophysics, 20, 419-429.
11. GOGEL, W. C. (1981). The role of suggested size in distance responses. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 149-155.
12. GOGEL, W. C. (1982). Analysis of the perception of motion concomitant with a lateral motion of the head. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 241-250.
13. GOGEL, W. C. (1990). A theory of phenomenal geometry and its applications. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 105-123.
14. GOGEL, W. C. (1993). The analysis of perceived space. In S. C. Masin (Ed.), Foundations of perceptual theory (pp. 113-182). New York: Elsevier.
15. GOGEL, W. C., & DA SILVA, J. A. (1987a). Familiar size and the theory of off-sized perceptions. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 318-328.
16. GOCEL, W. C., & DA SILVA, J. A. (1987b). A two-process theory of the response to size and distance. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 220-238.
17. GOGEL, W. C., & EBY, D. W. (1997). Measures of perceived linear size, sagittal motion, and visual angle from optical expansions and contractions. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 783-806.
18. GOGEL, W. C., & MERTZ, D. L. (1989). The contribution of heuristic processes to the moon illusion. In M. Hershenson (Ed.), The moon illusion (pp. 235-258). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. GOGEL, W. C., & NEWTON, R. E. (1969). Perception of off-sized objects Perception & Psychophysics, 5, 7-9.
20. GOGEL, W. C., & TIETZ, J. D. (1992a). Absence of compensation and reasoning-like processes in the perception of orientation in depth. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 309-318.
21. GOGEL, W. C., & TIETZ, J. D. (1992b). Determinants of the perception of sagittal motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 75-96.
22. GOGEL, W. C., WIST, E. R., & HARKER, G. S. (1963). A test of the invariance of the ratio of perceived size to perceived distance. American Journal of Psychology, 76, 537-553.
23. HERSHENSON, M. (1992a). The perception of shrinking in apparent motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 671-675.
24. HERSHENSON, M. (1992b). Size-distance invariance: Kinetic invariance is different from static invariance. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 541-548.
25. HERSHENSON, M. (1993). Structural constraints: Further evidence from apparent motion in depth. Perception, 22, 323-334.
26. HIGASHIYAMA, A. (1992). Anisotropic perception of visual angle: Implications for the horizontal-vertical illusion, overconstancy of size, and the moon illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 218-230.
27. HIGASHIYAMA, A., & SHIMONO, K. (1994). How accurate is size and distance perception for very far terrestrial objects? Function and causality. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 429-442.
28. JOHANSSON, G. (1977). Spatial constancy and motion in visual perception. In W. Epstein (Ed.), Stability and constancy in visual perception: Mechanisms and processes (pp. 375-419). New York: Wiley.
29. MCCREADY, D. (1965). Size-distance perception and accommodation-convergence micropsia - A critique. Vision Research, 5, 189-206.
30. MCCREADY, D. (1985). On size, distance, and visual angle perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 37, 323-334.
31. MCCREADY, D. (1986). Moon illusions redescribed. Perception & Psychophysics, 39, 64-72.
32. MERSHON, D. H., JONES, T. A., & TAYLOR, M. E. (1993). Organizational factors and the perception of motion in depth. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 240-249.
33. ONO, M. E., RIVEST, J., & ONO, H. (1986). Depth perception as a function of motion parallax and absolute-distance information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 12, 331-337.
34. OYAMA, T. (1974). Perceived size and perceived distance in stereoscopic vision and an analysis of their causal relations. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 175-181.
35. PERRONE, J. A. (1986). Anisotropic responses to motion toward and away from the eye. Perception & Psychophysics, 39, 1-8.
36. PREDEBON, J. (1987). Familiar size and judgments of distance: Effects of response mode. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 25, 244-246.
37. PREDEBON, J. (1990). Relative distance judgments of familiar and unfamiliar objects viewed under representatively natural conditions. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 342-348.
38. PREDEBON, J. (1991). Spatial judgments of exocentric extents in an open-field situation: Familiar versus unfamiliar size. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 361-366.
39. PREDEBON, J. (1992a). The influence of object familiarity on magnitude estimates of apparent size. Perception, 21, 77-90.
40. PREDEBON, J. (1992b). The role of instructions and familiar size in absolute judgments of size and distance. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 344-345.
41. PREDEBON, J. (1993). The familiar size cue to distance and stereoscopic depth perception. Perception, 22, 985-995.
42. PREDEBON, J. (1994). Perceived size of familiar objects and the theory of off-sized perceptions. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 238-247.
43. PREDEBON, J., & WOLLEY, J. S. (1994). The familiar-size cue to depth under reduced-cue viewing conditions. Perception, 23, 1301-1312.
44. RIVEST, J., ONO, H., & SAIDA, S. (1989). The roles of convergence and apparent distance in depth constancy with motion parallax. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 401-408.
45. SWANSTON, M. T., & GOGEL, W. C. (1986). Perceived size and motion in depth from optical expansion. Perception & Psychophysics, 39, 309-326.
46. WAGNER, M. (1985). The metric of visual space. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 483-495.
47. WALLACH, H., & ZUCKERMAN, C. (1963). The constancy of stereoscopic depth. American Journal of Psychology, 76, 404-412.