Aphasia, resources, and cross-talk: Do we now have a soup mix?

Aphasiology

Volumn 18, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 840-843

  Navon, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APHASIA; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR; CELL INTERACTION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; LOGIC; NERVE CELL; NEUROIMAGING; NOTE; PREDICTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; THEORY;

EID: 4544309388     PISSN: 02687038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Note

References (16)

1. Allport, D. A. (1980). Attention and performance. In G. Glaxton (Ed.), Cognitive psychology: New directions (pp. 112-153). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
2. Allport, A. (1989). Visual attention. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 631-682). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Allport, A. (1993). Attention and control: Have we been asking the wrong questions? A critical review of twenty-five years. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 183-218). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Kahneman, D., & Treisman, A. (1984). Changing views on automaticity. In R. Parasuraman & R. Davis (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp 29-62). New York: Academic Press.
5. Kinsbourne, M. (1981). Cognitive deficit and the unity of brain organization: Goldstein's perspective updated. Journal of Communication Disorders, 14, 181-194.
6. Logan, G. D., & Compton, B. J. (1998). Attention and automaticity. In R. D. Wright (Ed.), Visual attention. Vancouver studies in cognitive science (Vol. 8, pp. 108-131). London: Oxford University Press.
7. Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, 3-65.
8. Navon, D. (1984). Resources - A theoretical soup stone? Psychological Review, 91, 216-234.
9. Navon, D. (1985). Attention division or attention sharing? In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 133-146). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
10. Navon, D. (1994). From pink elephants to psychosomatic disorders: Paradoxical effects in cognition (a target article). Psychology, 5(36).
11. Navon, D., & Miller, J. (2002). Queuing or sharing? A critical evaluation of the single-bottleneck notion. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 193-251.
12. Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220-244.
13. Pashler, H., & Johnston, J. C. (1998). Attentional limitations in dual-task performance. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 155-189). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
14. Rock, I., & Mack, A. (1994). Attention and perceptual organization. In S. Ballesteros (Ed.), Cognitive approaches to human perception (pp. 23-41). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
15. Shuster, L. I. (2004). Resource theory and aphasia reconsidered: Why alternative theories can better guide our research. Aphasiology, 18, 811-830.
16. Tombu, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (2003). A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 3-18.