Comparative analysis of patient-centered outcome of total hip and knee arthroplasty;Vergleichende analyse der patientenzentrierten ergebnisse nach totalendoprothetischem ersatz von hüft- und kniegelenk

Aktuelle Rheumatologie

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 201-206

  Kirschner, S ^a   Matzer, M ^b   Wollmerstedt, N ^a   Walther, M ^a   Bohm D ^a   Konig A ^c   Faller, H ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ERLANGEN   (Germany)

^c KLINIK AM EICHERT   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Effect sizes; SF 36; SMFA D; Total hip and knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFERENCE PAPER; EFFECT SIZES; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GERMAN SHORT MUSCULOSKELETAL FUNCTION ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE; HEALTH STATUS; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MUSCULOSKELETAL FUNCTION; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PAIN; QUESTIONNAIRE; SHORT FORM 36 QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

EID: 4544299351     PISSN: 0341051X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-813309     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Aarons H, Hall G, Hughes S et al. Short-term recovery from hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996; 78: 555-558
2. Bachmeier CJ et al. A comparison of outcomes in osteoarthritis patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement surgery. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2001; 9: 137-146
3. Böhm TD, Kirschner S, Köhler M et al. The German Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire: reliability, validity, responsiveness, and comparison with the Short Form 36 and Constant score-a prospective evaluation of patients undergoing repair for rotator cuff tear. Rheumatol Int (im Druck) 2004
4. Bortz J, Döring N. Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation. Berlin: Springer, 1995: 569-580
5. Brinker MR, Lund PJ, Barrack RL. Demographic biases of scoring instruments for the results of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997; 79: 858-865
6. Brinker MR, Lund PJ, Cox DD et al. Demographic biases found in scoring instruments of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11: 820-830
7. Bullingern M. German translation and psychometric testing of the SF-36 Health Survey: preliminary results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. Soc Sci Med 1995; 41: 1359-1366
8. Bullinger M. Assessment of health related quality of life with the SF-36 Health Survey. Rehabilitation (Stuttg) 1996; 35: XVII-XVII
9. Bulstrode C. Outcome measures and their analysis. In: Pynsent PB, Fairbank JCT, Carr AJ (Hrsg). Outcome measures in Orthopaedics. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1993: 1-15
10. Dunbar M. Subjective outcomes after knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand 1996; 72 (Suppl): 1-63
11. Fortin PR et al. Outcomes of total hip and knee replacement: preoperative functional status predicts outcomes at six months after surgery. Arthritis Rheum 1999; 42: 1722-1728
12. Glatzel M, Wollmerstedt N, Dösch M et al. Reliabilitäts-, Validitäts- und Änderungssensitivitätsprüfung des Funktionsfragebogens Bewegungsapparat (SMFA-D) bei operierten Patienten mit rheumatoider Arthritis. Akt Rheumatol 2004; 29: 17-23
13. Grimmig H, Melzer C, Ludwig FJ et al. Der routinemäßige Einsatz des Lequesne-Index zur Ergebnismessung in der orthopadischen Rehabilitation bei Hüft- und Knieerkrankungen. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2002; 140: 452-459
14. Katz JN et al. The validity and reliability of a Total Hip Arthroplasty Outcome Evaluation Questionnaire. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995; 77: 1528-1534
15. Kiebzak GM, Vain PA, Gregory AM et al. SF-36 general health status survey to determine patient satisfaction at short-term follow-up after total hip and knee arthroplasty. J South Orthop Assoc 1997; 6: 169-172
16. Kirschner S, Walther M, Böhm D et al. German short musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire (SMFA-D): comparison with the SF-36 and WOMAC in a prospective evaluation in patients with primary osteoarthritis undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Rheumatol Int 2003; 23: 15-20
17. Kirschner S, Walther M, Mehling E et al. Reliabilitäts-, Validitäts- und Responsivitatsprüfung des Funktionsfragebogen Bewegungsapparat (SMFA-D) bei Patienten mit Coxarthrose und totalendoprothetischem Gelenkersatz des Hüftgelenkes. Z Rheumatol 2003; 62: 548-554
18. König A, Kirschner S. Langzeitergebnisse in der Knieendoprothetik. Orthopäde 2003; 32: 516-526
19. König A, Kirschner S, Walther M et al. I. Kulturelle Adaptation, Praktikabilitäts- und Reliabilitätsprüfung des Funktionsfragebogen Bewegungsapparat (SMFA-D). Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2000; 138: 295-301
20. König A, Walther M, Matzer M et al. II. Validität und Änderungssensitivität des Funktionsfragebogens Bewegungsapparat (SMFA-D) bei primärer Gonarthrose und totalendoprothetischem Gelenkersatz. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2000; 138: 302-305
21. Lieberman JR et al. Outcome after total hip arthroplasty. Comparison of a traditional disease-specific and a quality-of-life measurement of outcome. J Arthroplasty 1997; 12: 639-645
22. Lieberman JR et al. Differences between patients' and physicians' evaluations of outcome after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996; 78: 835-838
23. Lingard E, Hashimoto H, Sledge C. Development of outcome research for total joint arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 2000; 5: 175-177
24. Lingard EA, Katz JN, Wright RJ et al. Validity and responsiveness of the Knee Society Clinical Rating System in comparison with the SF-36 and WOMAC. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83-A: 1856 -1864
25. March LM et al. Outcomes after hip or knee replacement surgery for osteoarthritis. A prospective cohort study comparing patients" quality of life before and after surgery with age-related population norms. Med J Aust 1999; 171: 235-238
26. McGuigan FX, Hozack WJ, Moriarty L et al. Predicting quality-of-life outcomes following total joint arthroplasty. Limitations of the SF-36 Health Status Questionnaire. J Arthroplasty 1995; 10: 742-747
27. Poss R, Clark CR, Heckman JD. A concise format for reporting the longer-term follow-up status of patients managed with total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83-A: 1779-1781
28. Rissanen P, Aro S, Sintonen H et al. Quality of life and functional ability in hip and knee replacements: a prospective study. Qual Life Res 1996; 5: 56-64
29. Ritter MA, Albohm MJ, Keating EM et al. Comparative outcomes of total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1995; 10: 737-741
30. Ryd L, Karrholm J, Ahlvin P. Knee scoring systems in gonarthrosis. Acta Orthop Scand 1997; 68: 41-45
31. Slevin ML, Plant H, Lynch D et al. Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient? Br J Cancer 1988; 57: 109-112
32. Swiontkowski MF, Engelberg R, Martin DP et al. Short musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire: validity, reliability, and responsiveness. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999; 81: 1245-1260
33. Vickers AJ, Altman DG. Statistics notes: Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements. BMJ 2001; 323: 1123-1124
34. Wright JG, Young NL. A comparison of different indices of responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol 1997; 50: 239-246