Asymptotically improved convergence of optimized perturbation theory in the Bose-Einstein condensation problem

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 68, Issue 4 B, 2003, Pages

  Kneur, Jean Loïc ^a   Pinto, Marcus B ^a,b   Ramos, Rudnei O ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ MONTPELLIER II   (France)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

^c STATE UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASYMPTOTIC STABILITY; CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL METHODS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; OPTIMIZATION; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; PHASE TRANSITIONS;

BOSE-EINSTEIN CONDENSATION; OPTIMIZED PERTURBATION THEORY;

HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS;

EID: 4544298987     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. N. Goldenfeld, Lectures on Phase Transitions and The Renormalization Group, Frontiers in Physics Vol. 85 (Addison-Wesley, New York, 1992).
2. M. Gleiser, R.C. Howell, and R.O. Ramos, Phys. Rev. E 65, 036113 (2002).
3. K.G. Wilson and J. Kogut, Phys. Rep. 12, 75 (1974).
4. J. Zinn-Justin, Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1996).
5. Ph.W. Courteille, V.S. Bagnato, and V.I. Yukalov, Laser Phys. 11, 659 (2001)
6. F. Dalfovo, S. Giorgini, L.P. Pitaevskii, and S. Stringari, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 463 (1999).
7. D.G. Barci, E.S. Fraga, and R.O. Ramos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 479 (2000)
8. Laser Phys. 12, 43 (2002)
9. D.G. Barci, E.S. Fraga, M. Gleiser, and R.O. Ramos, Physica A 317, 535 (2003).
10. G. Baym, J.-P. Blaizot, M. Holzmann, F. Lalöe, and D. Vautherin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1703 (1999).
11. P. Arnold, G. Moore, and B. Tomásik, Phys. Rev. A 65, 013606 (2002).
12. G. Baym, J.-P. Blaizot, M. Holzmann, F. Lalöe, and D. Vautherin, e-print cond-mat/0107129.
13. G. Baym, J.-P. Blaizot, and J. Zinn-Justin, Europhys. Lett. 49, 150 (2000).
14. P. Arnold and B. Tomásik, Phys. Rev. A 62, 063604 (2000).
15. A. Okopińska, Phys. Rev. D 35, 1835 (1987)
16. A. Duncan and M. Moshe, Phys. Lett. B 215, 352 (1988).
17. H. Kleinert, Fortschr. Phys. 30, 187 (1986)
18. 30, 351 (1982)
19. and for the strong coupling case Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 266, 135 (1998).
20. V.I. Yukalov, Moscow Univ. Phys. Bull. 31, 10 (1976)
21. R. Seznec and J. Zinn-Justin, J. Math. Phys. 20, 1398 (1979)
22. J.C. LeGuillou and J. Zinn-Justin, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 147, 57 (1983)
23. H. Kleinert, Path Integrals in Quantum Mechanics, Statistics, Polymer Physics, and Financial Markets (World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, 2001), Chap. 5.
24. P. Arnold and G. Moore, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 120401 (2001)
25. Phys. Rev. E 64, 066113 (2001).
26. V.A. Kashurnikov, N.V. Prokof'ev, and B. V. Svistunov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 120402 (2001).
27. X. Sun, e-print hep-lat/0209144.
28. F.F. de Souza Cruz, M.B. Pinto, and R.O. Ramos, Phys. Rev. B 64, 014515 (2001)
29. Laser Phys. 12, 203 (2002).
30. F.F. de Souza Cruz, M.B. Pinto, R.O. Ramos, and P. Sena, Phys. Rev. A 65, 053613 (2002).
31. D.J. Bedingham and T.S. Evans, Phys. Rev. D 64, 105018 (2001).
32. S. Chiku and T. Hatsuda, Phys. Rev. D 58, 076001 (1998).
33. M.B. Pinto and R.O. Ramos, Phys. Rev. D 60, 105005 (1999)
34. 61, 125016 (2000).
35. H.F. Jones and P. Parkin, Nucl. Phys. B 594, 518 (2001).
36. E. Braaten and E. Radescu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 271602 (2002)
37. Phys. Rev. A 66, 063601 (2002).
38. H. Kleinert, e-print cond-mat/0210162.
39. I.R.C. Buckley, A. Duncan, and H.F. Jones, Phys. Rev. D 47, 2554 (1993)
40. C.M. Bender, A. Duncan, and H.F. Jones, ibid. 49, 419 (1994)
41. C. Arvanitis, H.F. Jones, and C.S. Parker, ibid. 52, 3704 (1995).
42. H. Kleinert and W. Janke, Phys. Lett. A 206, 283 (1995).
43. R. Guida, K. Konishi, and H. Suzuki, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 241, 152 (1995)
44. 249, 109 (1996).
45. B. Bellet, P. Garcia, and A. Neveu, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 11, 5587 (1997)
46. 11, 5607 (1997).
47. A. Duncan and H.F. Jones, Phys. Rev. D 47, 2560 (1993).
48. J.-L. Kneur and D. Reynaud, Eur. Phys. J. C 24, 323 (2002)
49. Phys. Rev. D 66, 085020 (2002).
50. J.-L. Kneur, M.B. Pinto, and R.O. Ramos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 210403 (2002); an addendum to this reference will take into account important quantitative changes and numerical results quoted in the present work.
51. S.K. Gandhi, H.F. Jones, and M.B. Pinto, Nucl. Phys. B 359, 429 (1991).
52. G. Krein, D.P. Menezes, and M.B. Pinto, Phys. Lett. B 370, 5 (1996)
53. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 9, 221 (2001).
54. P.M. Stevenson, Phys. Rev. D 23, 2916 (1981).
55. C.M. Bender and T.T. Wu, Phys. Rev. 184, 1231 (1969)
56. Phys. Rev. D 7, 1620 (1973).
57. E. Braaten and A. Nieto, Phys. Rev. D 51, 6990 (1995).
58. G.P. Lepage, J. Comput. Phys. 27, 192 (1978).
59. Mathematica version 3.0, S. Wolfram Company.
60. For a review, on the Borel summation method and many original references, see Large-Order Behavior of Perturbation Theory, edited by J.C. Le Guillou and J. Zinn-Justin, Current Physics-Sources and Comments (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1990).
61. M. Beneke, Phys. Rep. 317, 1 (1999).
62. Handbook of Mathematical Functions, edited by M. Abramowitz and I.A. Stegun (Dover, New York, 1972).
63. G.A. Baker, Jr., in Advances in Theoretical Physics (Academic Press, New York, 1965), Vol. 1, p. 1.
64. C. Arvanitis, F. Geniet, M. Iacomi, J.-L. Kneur, and A. Neveu, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 12, 3307 (1997).
65. B. Kastening, e-print cond-mat/0303486.
66. H. Kleinert, A. Pelster, B. Kastening, and M. Bachmann, Phys. Rev. E 62, 1537 (2000)
67. e-print hep-th/0105193
68. 4 Theories (World Scientific, Singapore, 2001)
69. http://www.physik.fu-berlin.de/kleinert/294/programs