Optimized perturbation theory at finite temperature

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 58, Issue 7, 1998, Pages

  Chiku, S ^a,b   Hatsuda, T ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

^b KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009283868     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.58.076001     Document Type: Article

References (104)

1. Quark Matter ’96, Nucl. Phys. A610 (1996)
2. LATTICE ’96, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 53 (1997).
3. A. Ukawa, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 53, 106 (1997).
4. See examples quoted in P. W. Anderson, Basic Notion of Condensed Matter Physics (Benjamin, New York, 1984)
5. W. Gebhardt and U. Krey, Phasenübergänge and Kritische Phänomene (Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn, Wiesbaden, 1980).
6. T. Hatsuda and T. Kunihiro, Phys. Rep. 247, 221 (1994).
7. K. Rajagopal, in Quark-Gluon Plasma 2, edited by R. Hwa (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995).
8. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D 9, 3357 (1974)
9. Phys. Rev. DL. Dolan and R. Jackiw, 9, 3320 (1974).
10. D. A. Kirzhnits and A. D. Linde, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 101, 195 (1976).
11. G. Baym and G. Grinstein, Phys. Rev. D 15, 2897 (1977)
12. Phys. Rev. DH. E. Haber and H. A. Weldon, 25, 502 (1982)
13. Phys. Rev. DG. Amelino-Camelia and S.-Y. Pi, 47, 2356 (1993)
14. G. Amelino-Camelia, Nucl. Phys. B476, 255 (1996)
15. G. Amelino-CameliaPhys. Lett. B 407, 268 (1997)
16. H.-S. Roh and T. Matsui, Eur. Phys. J. A 1, 205 (1998).
17. See also H. Nakkagawa and H. Yokota, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 11, 2259 (1996)
18. H. NakkagawaH. YokotaProg. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 129, 209 (1997)
19. K. Ogure and J. Sato, hep-ph/9802418 (1998) and references therein.
20. S. Chiku and T. Hatsuda, Phys. Rev. D 57, R6 (1998).
21. For applications of the mean-field method to field theories, see, e.g., Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev. 122, 345 (1961)
22. T. Kunihiro and T. Hatsuda, Prog. Theor. Phys. 71, 1332 (1984).
23. Since the number of works related to OPT is enormous, we quote only two books which contain the original references: G. A. Arteca, F. M. Fernández, and E. A. Castro, Large Order Perturbation Theory and Summation Methods in Quantum Mechanics, (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990)
24. H. Kleinert, Path Integrals in Quantum Mechanics, Statistical and Polymer Physics, 2nd ed. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995), Sec. 5.
25. See also T. Hatsuda, T. Kunihiro, and T. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3229 (1997)
26. T. Tanaka, Phys. Lett. A 238, 79 (1998).
27. A. Okopińska, Phys. Rev. D 36, 2415 (1987)
28. A. OkopińskaMod. Phys. Lett. A 12, 1003 (1997).
29. [In the first reference, OPT at finite (Formula presented) was examined with (Formula presented) being a small perturbation, which is in contrast with our approach.] See also G. A. Hajj and P. M. Stevenson, Phys. Rev. D 37, 413 (1988).
30. N. Banerjee and S. Mallik, Phys. Rev. D 43, 3368 (1991).
31. P. Fendley, Phys. Lett. B 196, 175 (1987).
32. E. Braaten and R. D. Pisarski, Nucl. Phys. B337, 569 (1990)
33. Nucl. Phys.E. BraatenR. D. PisarskiB339, 310 (1990)
34. R. R. Parwani, Phys. Rev. D 45, 4695 (1992)
35. Phys. Rev. DP. Arnold and C.-X. Zhai, 50, 7603 (1994)
36. Phys. Rev. DP. ArnoldC.-X. Zhai51, 1906 (1995).
37. See also F. Karsch, A. Patkos, and P. Petreczky, Phys. Lett. B 401, 69 (1997).
38. See, e.g., J. Negele and H. Orland, Quantum Many-Particle Systems (Addison-Wesley, New York, 1988).
39. If we explicitly write (Formula presented) in Eq. (4), it appears as (Formula presented) Therefore, the loop expansion by (Formula presented) at finite (Formula presented) does not coincide with the (Formula presented) expansion. The expansion by (Formula presented) should be regarded as a steepest descent evaluation of the functional integral 17.
40. R. E. Norton and J. M. Cornwall, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 91, 106(1975)
41. M. B. Kislinger and P. D. Morley, Phys. Rev. D 13, 2771 (1976)
42. H. Matsumoto, I. Ojima, and H. Umezawa, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 152, 348 (1984)
43. A. J. Niemi and G. W. Semenoff, Nucl. Phys. B230 [FS10], 181 (1984).
44. B. W. Lee, Nucl. Phys. B9, 649 (1969); NUPBBOChiral Dynamics (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1972).
45. T. Kugo, Prog. Theor. Phys. 57, 593 (1977).
46. This point was first recognized in 14.
47. At finite (Formula presented) or chemical potential, only the rotational symmetry in space is preserved in the rest frame of the heat bath or matter. Therefore, (Formula presented) in general.
48. S. Chiku and T. Hatsuda (under investigation).
49. P. M. Stevenson, Phys. Rev. D 23, 2916 (1981).
50. Although (Formula presented) at high (Formula presented) coincides with the Debye screening mass for (Formula presented) they could be different in higher orders: Physical Debye mass is, in general, a function of (Formula presented)
51. In this case, (Formula presented) at the stationary point of the thermal effective potential.
52. W. A. Bardeen and M. Mosche, Phys. Rev. D 28, 1372 (1983).
53. See, e.g., C. Itzykson and J-B. Zuber, Quantum Field Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1985)
54. T. Muta, Foundations of Quantum Chromodynamics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1987).
55. See the following papers and the references quoted therein for the breakdown of the NG theorem in self-consistent methods and for attempts to cure the problem: A. Okopińska, Phys. Lett. B 375, 213 (1996)
56. A. Dmitrašinović, J. A. McNeil, and J. R. Shepard, Z. Phys. C 69, 359 (1996)
57. G. Amelino-Camelia, Phys. Lett. B 407, 268 (1997).
58. T. Hatsuda and T. Kunihiro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 158 (1985)
59. T. HatsudaT. KunihiroPhys. Lett. B 185, 304 (1987)
60. Another interesting issue is the spectral change of vector mesons: R. D. Pisarski, Phys. Lett. 110B, 155 (1982)
61. G. E. Brown and M. Rho, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2720 (1991)
62. T. Hatsuda and S. H. Lee, Phys. Rev. C 46, R34 (1992)
63. T. Hatsuda, Y. Koike, and S. H. Lee, Nucl. Phys. B394, 221 (1993).
64. H. A. Weldon, Phys. Lett. B 274, 133 (1992)
65. Phys. Lett. BC. Song and V. Koch, 404, 1 (1997).
66. S. Huang and M. Lissia, Phys. Rev. D 52, 1134 (1995)
67. S. HuangM. LissiaPhys. Lett. B 348, 571 (1995)
68. S. HuangM. LissiaPhys. Rev. D 53, 7270 (1996).
69. L. H. Chan and R. W. Haymaker, Phys. Rev. D 7, 402 (1973)
70. Phys. Rev. DL. H. ChanR. W. Haymaker10, 4170 (1974).
71. R. D. Pisarski and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. D 29, 338 (1984)
72. K. Rajagopal and F. Wilczek, Nucl. Phys. B399, 395 (1993).
73. See also M. Asakawa, Z. Huang, and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3126 (1995)
74. J. Randrup, Phys. Rev. D 55, 1188 (1997) and references therein.
75. In the present paper, (Formula presented) and the sign of (Formula presented) are defined differently from those in 34. Also (Formula presented) in 34 should be considered as an unrenormalized parameter, while (Formula presented) in the present paper is a renormalized one.
76. N. A. Törnqvist and M. Ross, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1575 (1996)
77. M. Harada, F. Sannino, and J. Schechter, Phys. Rev. D 54, 1991 (1996)
78. M. HaradaF. SanninoJ. SchechterPhys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1603 (1997)
79. S. Ishida, Prog. Theor. Phys. 95, 745 (1996)
80. Prog. Theor. Phys.S. Ishida98, 1005 (1997)
81. J. A. Oller, E. Oset, and J. R. Peláez, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3452 (1998)
82. K. Igi and K. Hikasa, hep-ph/9807326, 1998.
83. B. Kastening, Phys. Lett. B 283, 287 (1992)
84. Phys. Lett. BM. Bando, T. Kugo, N. Maekawa, and H. Nakano, 301, 83 (1993)
85. M. BandoT. KugoN. MaekawaH. NakanoProg. Theor. Phys. 90, 405 (1993).
86. M. Le Bellac, Thermal Field Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1996).
87. M. Gell-Mann, R. J. Oakes, and B. Renner, Phys. Rev. 175, 2195 (1968).
88. D. A. Kirzhnits and A. D. Linde, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 101, 195 (1976)
89. G. Baym and G. Grinstein, Phys. Rev. D 15, 2897 (1977)
90. H.-S. Roh and T. Matsui, Eur. Phys. J. A 1, 205 (1998).
91. We have studied the free energy as a function of (Formula presented) near the chiral limit and found that it has a discontinuity at a certain temperature between (Formula presented) and (Formula presented) This is another sign that the first order nature is an artifact of the approximation. [Remember that the free energy must be a continuous function of (Formula presented) irrespective of the order of the phase transition: see, e.g., N. Goldenfeld, Lectures on Phase Transitions and the Renormalization Group (Addison-Wesley, New York, 1992).]
92. See K. Kanaya and S. Kaya, Phys. Rev. D 51, 2404 (1995) and references therein.
93. H. Itoyama and A. H. Mueller, Nucl. Phys. B218, 349 (1983)
94. E. V. Shuryak, Phys. Lett. B 207, 345 (1988)
95. Phys. Lett. BJ. L. Goity and H. Leutwyler, 228, 517 (1989)
96. H. Leutwyler and A. V. Smilga, Nucl. Phys. B342, 302 (1990)
97. R. D. Pisarski and M. Tytgat, Phys. Rev. D 54, 2989 (1996).
98. A preliminary version of this study has been reported in S. Chiku, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 129, 91 (1998).
99. C. Gale and J. I. Kapusta, Nucl. Phys. B357, 65 (1991).
100. S. Hafjitheodoridis and B. Moussallam, Phys. Rev. D 37, 1331 (1988).
101. S. P. Klevansky, Nucl. Phys. A575, 605 (1994).
102. P. Rehberg, Yu. I. Kalinovskii, and D. Blaschke, Nucl. Phys. A622, 478 (1997). In this paper, the mode couplings are not taken into account.
103. A. D. Linde, Phys. Lett. 96B, 289 (1980).
104. See also T. Hatsuda, Phys. Rev. D 56, 8111 (1997) and references therein.