Traffic studies for fast optical switching in an intelligent optical network

Photonic Network Communications

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 285-307

  De Maesschalck, S ^a   Nederlof, L ^b   Vaughn, M ^b   Wagner, R E ^b  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b Corning Incorporated ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Access network; Fast optical switching; Intelligent optical network; Metro network; Network evolution; Optical backbone network; Peering; Traffic granularity

Indexed keywords

MARKETING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SIGNAL PROCESSING; TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS; TELECOMMUNICATION TRAFFIC; THRESHOLD LOGIC; USER INTERFACES;

NETWORK EVOLUTION; OPTICAL NETWORKS; OPTICAL SWITCHING; TRAFFIC GRANULARITY;

OPTICAL SWITCHES;

EID: 4544259778     PISSN: 1387974X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:PNET.0000041239.57221.1a     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. L. Roberts, C. Crump, US Internet IP traffic growth, available at http://www.caspiannetworks.com/library/presentations/traffic/ Internet_Traffic_081301.ppt., (August 2001).
2. "Is your slice of the global market big enough?", Telecommunications International, vol. 37, no. 5, (May 2003), pp. 14-16.
3. S. De Maesschalck, et al., Intelligent optical networking for multi-layer survivability, IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 40, no. 1, (Jan. 2002), pp. 42-49.
4. Proc. IST-LION/IST-OPTIMIST Workshop on Intelligent High-Capacity Optical Networks: Opportunities and Challenges, (Turin, Italy, Oct. 2002), available at http://www.telecomitalialab.com/congressi_e.htm.
5. ITU-T Rec. G.8080/Y.1304, Architecture for the Automatic Switched Optical Network (ASON) (Nov. 2001).
6. E. Mannie (ed.), Internet Draft, Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching Architecture, available at draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-06.txt (April 2003).
7. OIF-UNI-01.0 - User Network Interface (UNI) 1.0 Signaling Specification, (October 2001), available at http://www.oiforum.com/public/documents/OIF-UNI-01. 0.pdf.
8. S. De Maesschalck, D. Colle, D. Willems, M. Pickavet, P. Demeester, On the capacity requirements of ASONs versus OTNs, Proc. of HSNMC 2003, (Estoril, Portugal, July 2003), pp. 416-425.
9. A. Dwivedi, R. E. Wagner, Traffic model for USA LH optical network, Proc. of OFC 2000, (Baltimore, U.S.A., March 2000), vol. 1, TuK1-1, pp. 156-158.
10. M. Vaughn, M. Chia, R. E. Wagner, A bottom-up traffic demand model for long-haul and metropolitan optical networks, Proc. of OFC 2003, (Atlanta, U.S.A., March 2003), MF111, vol. 1, pp. 139-140.
11. The telecom depression, when will it end, Businessweek, (October 2002), pp. 90-96.
12. R. E. Wagner, L. Nederlof, M. Vaughn, S. De Maesschalck, D. Cotter, B. Hemenway, Interconnection of metropolitan and backbone networks, Proc. of OFC 2003, (Atlanta, U.S.A., March 2003), ThH1, vol. 2, pp. 479-480.
13. M. Vaughn, R. E. Wagner, Metropolitan network traffic demand study, Proc. of LEOS 2000, (Rio Grande, Puerto Rico, November 2000), MK4, vol. 1, pp. 102-103.
14. Cambridge Strategic Management Group.
15. S. Bartholomew, The art of peering, BT Technology Journal, vol. 18, no. 3, (July 2000), pp. 33-39.
16. G. Huston, Interconnection, peering, and settlements, Proc. of INET '99, (San Jose, U.S.A., June 1999), available at http://www.potaroo.net/papers/ inet99/peering.htm.
17. W. Norton, Internet Service providers and peering, available at http://netweb.usc.edu/cs551/papers/norton-peering-wp01.pdf.
18. W. Norton, The art of peering: The peering playbook, available at http://www.xchangepoint.net/white_papers/wp20020625.pdf.
19. http://www.colosource.com/ix.asp
20. R. E. Wagner, Optical network architectures, Proc. of NOC 2001, (Ipswich, UK, June 2001), pp. 22-29.
21. R. E. Wagner, L. Nederlof, M. Vaughn, S. De Maesschalck, D. Cotter, B. Hemenway, The potential of optical layer network, Proc. of OFC 2001, (Anaheim, U.S.A., March 2001), TuT3, vol. 2, pp. T1-3.