Effect of stimulus intensity on manual and saccadic reaction time

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 66, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 535-544

  Jaśkowski, Piotr ^a,b,c   Sobieralska, Kinga ^a  

^a KAZIMIERZ WIELKI UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LÜBECK   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FINANCE AND MANAGEMENT   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4544253664     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194899     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. ALLIK, J., & KREEGIPUU, K. (1998). Multiple visual latency. Psychological Science, 9, 135-138.
2. BRAUNER, J. D., & LIT, A. (1976). The Pulflich effect, simple reaction time, and time intensity discrimination. American Journal of Psychology, 89, 105-114.
3. COWEY, A., & STOERIG, P. (1991). The neurobiology of blindsight. Trends in Neurosciences, 14, 140-145.
4. DONDERS, F. C. (1868). Die Schnelligkeit psychischer Prozesse. Archive für Anatomie & Physiologie & wissenschafiliche Medizin, pp. 657-681.
5. DORRIS, M. C., & MUNOZ, D. P. (1999). The underrated role of the "move system" in determining saccade latency. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 681-682.
6. DZHAFAROV, E. N. (1992). The structure of simple reaction time to step-function signals. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 36, 235-268.
7. FINDLEY, J. M., & WALKER, R. (1999). A model of saccade generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 661-721.
8. GAYMARD, B., PLONER, C. J., RIVAUD, S., VERMERSCH, A. I., & PIERROT-DESEILLIGNY, C. (1998). Cortical control of saccades. Experimental Brain Research, 123, 159-163.
9. GRICE, G. R., NULLMEYER, R., & SPIKER, V. A. (1982). Human reaction time: Toward a general theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 135-153.
10. HUGHES, H. C., & KESLEY, J. V. (1984). Response-dependent effects on near-threshold detection performance: Saccades versus manual responses. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 543-546.
11. JAŚKOWSKI, P. (1985). The effect of visual adaptation on simple motor reaction time: Pt. 1. Studia Psychologica, 27, 191-201.
12. JAŚKOWSKI, P. (1992). Temporal-order judgment and reaction time for short and long stimuli. Psychological Research, 54, 141-145.
13. JAŚKOWSKI, P. (1996). Simple reaction time and perception of temporal order: Dissociations and hypotheses. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 82, 707-730.
14. JAŚKOWSKI, P. (1999). Reaction time and temporal order judgment: The problem of dissociations. In G. Aschersleben, T. Bachmann, & J. Müsseler (Eds.), Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events (pp. 265-287). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
15. JAŚKOWSKI, P., & VERLEGER, R. (2000). Attentional bias toward low-intensity stimuli: An explanation for the intensity dissociation between reaction time and temporal order judgment? Consciousness & Cognition, 9, 435-456.
16. KASTEN, E., POGGEL, D. A., MÜLLER-OEHRING, E., GÖTHE, J., SCHULTE, T., & SABEL, B. A. (1999). Restoration of vision: II. Residual fimctions and training-induced visual field enlargement in brain damaged patients. Restorative Neurology & Neuroscience, 15, 273-287.
17. LUDWIG, C. J., & GILCHRIST, I. D. (2002). Stimulus-driven and goal-driven control over visual selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 902-912.
18. MANSFIELD, R. J. W. (1973). Latency function in human vision. Vision Research, 13, 2219-2234.
19. MANSFIELD, R. J. W., & DAUGMAN, J. A. (1978). Retinal mechanism of visual latency. Vision Research, 18, 1247-1260.
20. MARCEL, A. J. (1998). Blindsight and shape perception: Deficit of visual consciousness or of visual function? Brain, 121, 1565-1588.
21. MAY, J. G., BERG, M. L., & ZEBLEY, A. (1999). Saccadic latency during perceptual processing and sequence learning. Documenta Ophthalmologica, 99, 103-121.
22. MENENDEZ, A., & LIT, A. (1983). Effects of test flash and steady background luminance on simple visual reaction time and perceived simultaneity. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 24, 95.
23. MILLER, J., & ULRICH, R. (1998). Locus of the effect of the number of alternative responses: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1215-1231.
24. MILLER, J., ULRICH, R., & RINKENAUER, G. (1999). Effects of stimulus intensity on the lateralized readiness potential. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1454-1471.
25. MILNER, A. D. (1998). Streams and consciousness: Visual awareness and the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 25-30.
26. MILNER, A. D., & GOODALE, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. NEUMANN, O. (1990). Direct parameter specification and the concept of perception. Psychological Research, 52, 207-215.
28. NEUMANN, O., ANSORGE, U., & KLOTZ, W. (1998). Funktionsdifferenzierung im visuellen Kortex: Grundlage für motorische Aktivierung durch nicht bewußt wahrgenommene Reize? Psychologische Rundschau, 49, 185-196.
29. NEUMANN, O., & MÜSSELER, J. (1990). "Judgment" vs. "response": A general problem and some experimental illustrations. In M. H. Müller & W. Prinz (Eds.), Psychophysical explorations of mental structures (pp. 445-455). Göttingen: Hogrefe & Huber.
30. PERENIN, M.-T., & ROSSETTI, Y. (1996). Grasping without form discrimination in a hemianopia field. NeuroReport, 7, 793-797.
31. PINS, D., & BONNET, C. (1996). On the relation between stimulus intensity and processing time: Piéron's law and choice reaction time. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 390-400.
32. PTITO, A., FORTIN, A., & PTITO, M. (2001). "Seeing" in the blind hemifield following hemispherectomy. Progress in Brain Research, 134, 367-378.
33. RATCLIFF, R., & ROUDER, J. N. (1998). Modeling response times for two-choice decisions. Psychological Science, 9, 347-356.
34. ROUFS, J. A. J. (1974). Dynamic properties of vision: V. Perception lag and reaction time in relation to flicker and flash thresholds. Vision Research, 14, 853-869.
35. SAHRAIE, A., TREVETHAN, C. T., WEISKRANTZ, L., OLSON, J., MACLEOD, M. J., MURRAY, A. D., DIJKHUIZEN, R. S., COUNSELL, C., & COLEMAN, R. (2003). Spatial channels of visual processing in cortical blindness. European Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 1189-1196.
36. SANDERS, A. F. (1980). Stage analysis of reaction processes. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior (pp. 331-354). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
37. SASLOW, M. G. (1967). Latency for saccadic eye movements. Journal of the Optical Society of Americaa, 57, 1030-1033.
38. SCHÄRLI, H., HARMAN, A. M., & HOGBEN, J. H. (1999). Blindsight in subjects with homonymous visual field defects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 52-66.
39. STERNBERG, S., & KNOLL, R. L. (1973). The perception of temporal order: Fundamental issues and a general model. In. S. Kornblum (Ed.), Attention andperformance IV (pp. 629-685). New York: Academic Press.
40. VAUGHAN, H. G., JR., COSTA, L. D., & GILDEN, I. (1966). The functional relation of visual response and reaction time to stimulus intensity. Vision Research, 6, 645-656.
41. WALKER, R., WALKER, D. G., HUSAIN, M., & KENNARD, C. (2000). Control of voluntary and reflexive saccades. Experimental Brain Research, 130, 540-544.
42. WEISKRANTZ, L. (1997). Consciousness lost and found: A neuropsychological exploration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43. WEISKRANTZ, L., WARRINGTON, E. K., SANDERS, M. D., & MARSHALL, J. (1974). Visual capacity in the hemianopic field following a restricted occipital ablation. Brain, 97, 709-728.
44. WILLIAMS, J. M., & LIT, A. (1983). Luminance-dependent visual latency for the Hess effect, Pulfrich effect, and simple reaction time. Vision Research, 23, 171-179.
45. WURTZ, R. H., & OPTICAN, L. M. (1994). Superior colliculus cell types and models of saccade generation. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 4, 857-861.