Context gives meaning. Commentary on Badiani and Robinson Drug-induced neurobehavioral plasticity: The role of environmental context

Behavioural Pharmacology

Volumn 15, Issue 5-6, 2004, Pages 381-385

  Szechtman, H ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPHETAMINE; CLORGYLINE; COCAINE; DOPAMINE; MORPHINE; PSYCHOSTIMULANT AGENT; QUINPIROLE;

BEHAVIOR; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; DOPAMINE RELEASE; DRUG DEPENDENCE; DRUG EXPOSURE; DRUG RESPONSE; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; HUMAN; LOCOMOTION; LONG TERM EXPOSURE; MENTAL DISEASE; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NEUROPATHOLOGY; NONHUMAN; NOTE; ONCOGENE C FOS; SENSITIZATION;

EID: 4544241329     PISSN: 09558810     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00008877-200409000-00012     Document Type: Note

References (46)

1. Angrist B (1983). Psychosis induced by central nervous system stimulants and related drugs. In: Creese I (editor): Stimulants, neurochemical, behavioral, and clinical perspectives. New York: Raven Press; pp. 1-30.
2. Antelman SM (1988). Stressor-induced sensitization to subsequent stress; Implications for the development and treatment of clinical disorders. In: Kalivas PW, Barnes CD (editors): Sensitization in the Nervous System. Caldwell, NJ: Terford Press; pp. 227-254.
3. Antelman SM, Szechtman H (1975). Tail pinch induces eating in sated rats which appears to depend on nigrostriatal dopamine. Science 189:731-733.
4. Antelman SM, Szechtman H, Chin P, Fisher AE (1975). Tail pinch-induced eating, gnawing and licking behavior in rats: dependence on the nigrostriatal dopamine system. Brain Res 99:219-237.
5. Antelman SM, Rowland NE, Fisher AE (1976). Stimulation bound ingestive behavior: a view from the tail. Physiol Behav 17:743-748.
6. Badiani A, Robinson TE (2004). Drug-induced neurobehavioral plasticity: the role of environmental context. Behav Pharmacol 15:327-339.
7. Brake WG, Zhang TY, Diorio J, Meaney MJ, Gratton A (2004). Influence of early postnatal rearing conditions on mesocorticolimbic dopamine and behavioural responses to psychostimulants and stressors in adult rats. Eur J Neurosci 19:1863-1874.
8. Carlton PL (1983). A Primer of Behavioral Pharmacology: Concepts and Principles in the Behavioral Analysis of Drug Action, New York: W.H. Freeman.
9. Cools AR, Broekkamp CL, Van Rossum JM (1977). Subcutaneous injections of apomorphine, stimulus generalization and conditioning: serious pitfalls for the examiner using apomorphine as a tool. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 6:705-708.
10. Culver KE, Szechtman H (2004). Hypophysectomy does not block sensitization to the dopamine agonist quinpirole or its modulation by the MAOI clorgyline. Horm Behav 45:23-30.
11. Culver KE, Rosenfeld JM, Szechtman H (2000). A switch mechanism between locomotion and mouthing implicated in sensitization to quinpirole in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 151:202-210.
12. Ehrlich P (1908). Partial cell functions. In: Nobel Lectures, Physiology or Medicine 1901-1921. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing Company, 1967. Available at http://www.nobel.se/medicine/laureates/1908/ehrlich-lecture. html (accessed 8 July 2004).
13. Einat H, Szechtman H (1993). Environmental modulation of both locomotor response and locomotor sensitization to the dopamine agonist quinpirole. Behav Pharmacol 4:399-403.
14. Einat H, Einat D, Allan M, Talangbayan H, Tsafnat T, Szechtman H (1996). Associational and nonassociational mechanisms in locomotor sensitization to the dopamine agonist quinpirole. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 127:95-101.
15. Ellinwood EH Jr (1968). Amphetamine psychosis. II. Theoretical implications. Int J Neuropsychiatry 4:45-54.
16. Ellison GD (1979). Animal models of psychopathology: studies in naturalistic colony environments. In: Keehn JD (editor): Psychopathology in Animals: Research and Clinical Implications. New York: Academic Press; pp. 81-101.
17. Guder LD, Kornblith CL (1979). Tail pinch-induced eating does generalize to a nonpreferred but familiar food. Physiol Behav 22:179-183.
18. Imperato A, Tanda G, Frau R, Di Chiara G (1988). Pharmacological profile of dopamine receptor agonists as studied by brain dialysis in behaving rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 245:257-264.
19. Kalivas PW, Pierce RC, Cornish J, Sorg BA (1998). A role for sensitization in craving and relapse in cocaine addiction. J Psychopharmacol 12:49-53.
20. Katz RJ, Roth KA, Schmaltz K (1980). Tail pinch facilitation of self-stimulation in the rat - dependence upon dopamine and independence of opiates. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 12:389-391.
21. Koeltzow TE, Austin JD, Vezina P (2003). Behavioral sensitization to quinpirole is not associated with increased nucleus accumbens dopamine overflow. Neuropharmacology 44:102-110.
22. Koob GF, Fray PJ, Iversen SD (1976). Tail-pinch stimulation: sufficient motivation for learning. Science 194:637-639.
23. Levine AS, Morley JE (1981). Stress-induced eating in rats. Am J Physiol 241:R72-R76.
24. Marques DM, Fisher AE, Okrutny MS, Rowland NE (1979). Tail pinch induced fluid ingestion: interactions of taste and deprivation. Physiol Behav 22:37-41.
25. Mufson EJ, Balagura S, Riss W (1976). Tail pinch-induced arousal and stimulus-bound behavior in rats with lateral hypothalamic lesions. Further evaluation of hypothalamic control of feeding and drinking. In: Riss W (editor): Brain, Behavior and Evolution. Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger; pp. 154-164.
26. Nemeroff CB, Osbahr AJ 3rd, Bissette G, Jahnke G, Lipton MA, Prange AJ (1978). Cholecystokinin inhibits tail pinch-induced eating in rats. Science 200:793-794.
27. Picone TA, Hall RD (1979). Effects of early malnutrition on tail pinch-induced behavior of the rat. Physiol Behav 22:149-155.
28. Post RM, Contel NR (1981). Cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization: A model for recurrent manic illness. In: Biological Psychiatry 1981. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press; pp. 746-749.
29. Post RM, Weiss SRB (1988). Sensitization and kindling: Implications for the evolution of psychiatric symptomatology. In: Kalivas PW, Barnes CD (editors): Sensitization in the Nervous System. Caldwell, NJ: Terford Press; pp. 257-291.
30. Robinson TE, Berridge KC (1997). The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res Rev 18:247-291.
31. Sahakian BJ, Robbins TW (1977). Isolation-rearing enhances tail pinch-induced oral behavior in rats. Physiol Behav 18:53-58.
32. Sherman KA (1972). Tail-pinch induced maternal behavior: evidence for the role of internal state in response selection during tail-pinch activation. Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Pittsburgh.
33. Szechtman H (1980). Redirected oral behavior in rats induced by tail-pinch and electrical stimulation of the tail. Physiol Behav 24:57-64.
34. Szechtman H, Eilam D (2004). Psychiatric models. In: Whishaw IQ, Kolb B (editors): The Behavior of the Laboratory Rat: A Handbook With Tests. London: Oxford University Press; pp. 462-474.
35. Szechtman H, Hall WG (1980). Ontogeny of oral behavior induced by tail pinch and electrical stimulation of the tail in rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol 94: 436-445.
36. Szechtman H, Woody E (2004). Obsessive-compulsive disorder as a disturbance of security motivation. Psychol Rev 111:111-127.
37. Szechtman H, Siegel HI, Rosemblatt JS, Komisaruk BR (1977). Tail-pinch facilitates onset of maternal behavior in rats. Physiol Behav 19:807-809.
38. Szechtman H, Talangbayan H, Eilam D (1993). Environmental and behavioral components of sensitization induced by the dopamine agonist quinpirole. Behav Pharmacol 4:405-410.
39. Szechtman H, Talangbayan H, Canaran G, Dai H, Eilam D (1994). Dynamics of behavioral sensitization induced by the dopamine agonist quinpirole and a proposed central energy control mechanism. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 115:95-104. [Published erratum appears in Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1994; 116:124.]
40. Szechtman H, Eckert MJ, Tse WS, Boersma JT, Bonura CA, McClelland JZ, et al. (2001). Compulsive checking behavior of quinpirole-sensitized rats as an animal model of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD): form and control. BMC Neurosci 2:4. Available at http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/ 2/4 (accessed 8 July 2004).
41. Szumlinski KK, Allan M, Talangbayan H, Tracey A, Szechtman H (1997). Locomotor sensitization to quinpirole: environment-modulated increase in efficacy and context-dependent increase in potency. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 134:193-200.
42. The Official Web Site of The Nobel Foundation 2004. Paul Ehrlich - Biography. Available at http://www.nobel.se/medicine/laureates/1908/ehrlich-bio. html/ (accessed 8 July 2004).
43. Tizabi Y, Louis VA, Taylor CT, Waxman D, Culver KE, Szechtman H (2002). Effect of nicotine on quinpirole-induced checking behavior in rats: implications for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Biol Psychiatry 51:164-171.
44. Willner P, Papp M, Cheeta S, Muscat R (1992). Environmental influences on behavioural sensitization to the dopamine agonist quinpirole. Behav Pharmacol 3:43-50.
45. Wilson KG (1993). The Columbia Guide to Standard American English. New York: Columbia University Press.
46. Wise RA, Yokel RA, Dewit H (1976). Both positive reinforcement and conditioned aversion from amphetamine and from apomorphine in rats. Science 191:1273-1275.