Associated and nonassociational mechanisms in locomotor sensitization to the dopamine agonist quinpirole

Psychopharmacology

Volumn 127, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 95-101

  Einat, Haim ^a   Einat, Daphna ^a   Allan, Melissa ^a   Talangbayan, Hazel ^a   Tsafnat, Tamar ^a   Szechtman, Henry ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Conditioned locomotion; Context dependent sensitization; Context independent sensitization; D2D3 agonist; Hyperactivity; Rats; Reverse tolerance

Indexed keywords

DOPAMINE RECEPTOR STIMULATING AGENT; QUINPIROLE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISCRIMINATIVE STIMULUS; DRUG DISCRIMINATION; ENVIRONMENT; LOCOMOTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SENSITIZATION; SUBCUTANEOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; ANIMAL; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG EFFECT; DRUG TOLERANCE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION;

ANIMALS; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); DOPAMINE AGONISTS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; DRUG TOLERANCE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; QUINPIROLE; RATS;

EID: 0029658393     PISSN: 00333158     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/bf02805980     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ahmed SH, Stinus L, Le Moal M, Cador M (1993) Controlling interindividual differences in the unconditioned response to amphetamine in the study of environment-dependent sensitization. Behav Pharmacol 4: 355-365
2. Angrist B (1983) Psychosis induced by central nervous system stimulants and related drugs. In: Creese I (ed) Stimulants: neurochemical, behavioral and clinical perspectives. Raven Press, New York, pp 1-30
3. Antelman SM (1988a) Stressor-induced sensitization to subsequent stress: implications for the development and treatment of clinical disorders. In: Kalivas PW, Barnes CD (eds) Sensitization in the nervous system. Telford Press, Caldwell, N.J., pp 227-254
4. Badiani A, Browman KE, Robinson TE (1995) Influence of novel versus home environments on sensitization to the psychomotor stimulant effects of cocaine and amphetamine. Brain Res 674: 291-298
5. Baker TB, Tiffany ST (1985) Morphine tolerance as habituation. Psychol Rev 92: 78-108
6. Chaudry IA, Turkanis SA, Karler R (1988) Characteristics of "reverse tolerance" to amphetamine-induced locomotor stimulation in mice. Neuropharmacology 27: 777-781
7. Druhan JP, Jakob A, Stewart J (1993) The development of behavioral sensitization to apomorphine is blocked by MK-801. Eur J Pharmacol 243: 73-77
8. Eilam D, Szechtman H (1989) Biphasic effect of D-2 agonist quinpirole on locomotion and movements. Eur J Pharmacol 161: 151-157
9. 2 dopamine agonists on stereotyped locomotion in rats. Behav Brain Res 45: 117-124
10. 2 receptors. Psychopharmacology 106: 447-454
11. Einat H, Szechtman H (1993a) Environmental modulation of both locomotor response and locomotor sensitization to the dopamine agonist quinpirole. Behav Pharmacol 4: 399-403
12. Einat H, Szechtman H (1993b) Longlasting consequences of chronic treatment with the dopamine agonist quinpirole for the undrugged behavior of rats. Behav Brain Res 54: 35-41
13. Ellinwood EH (1968) Amphetamine psychosis. II. Theoretical implications. J Neuropsychiatr 4: 45-54
14. Ellinwood EH, Jr, Sudilovski A, Nelson L (1972) Behavioral analysis of chronic amphetamine intoxication. Biol Psychiatry 4: 215-230
15. Ellison GD (1979) Animal models of psychopathology: studies in naturalistic colony environments. In: Keehn JD (ed) Psychopathology in animals. Academic Press, New York, pp 81-101
16. 2 agonist bromocriptine show environment-specific sensitization following repeated injections. Psychopharmacology 107: 277-284
17. Kokkinidis L, Anisman H (1980) Amphetamine models of amphetamine paranoid schizophrenia: an overview and elaboration of animal experimentation. Psychol Bull 88: 551-579
18. Mattingly BA, Gotsick JE (1989) Conditioning and experimental factors affecting the development of sensitization to apomorphine. Behav Neurosci 103: 1311-1317
19. 2 receptors on conditioned locomotion in rats. Psychopharmacology 105: 107-112
20. Post RM, Contel NR (1981) Cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization: a model for recurrent manic illness. In: Perris C, Struwe G, Jansson B (eds) Biological psychiatry. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 746-749
21. Post RM, Lockfeld A, Squillace KM, Contel NR (1981) Drug-environment interaction: context dependency of cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization. Life Sci 28: 755-760
22. Post RM, Weiss SRB (1988) Sensitization and kindling: implications for the evolution of psychiatric symptomatology. In: Kalivas PW, Barnes CD (eds) Sensitization in the nervous system. Telford Press, Caldwell, NJ, pp 257-291
23. Robinson TE, Becker JB (1986) Enduring changes in brain and behavior produced by chronic amphetamine administration: a review and evaluation of animal models of amphetamine psychosis. Brain Res Rev 11: 157-198
24. Robinson TE, Berridge KC (1993) The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res Rev 18: 247-291
25. Segal DS, Schuckit MA (1983) Animal models of stimulant-induced psychosis. In: Creese I (ed) Stimulants: neurochemical, behavioral and clinical perspectives. Raven Press, New York, pp 131-167
26. Silverman PB (1991) Sensitization and conditioned rotation: apomorphine, quinpirole and SKF-38393 compared. Neuroreport 2: 669-672
27. Stewart J, Badiani A (1993) Tolerance and sensitization to the behavioral effects of drugs. Behav Pharmacol 4 289-312
28. Stewart J, Vezina P (1991) Extinction procedures abolish conditioned stimulus control but spare sensitized responding to amphetamine. Behav Pharmacol 2: 65-71
29. Szechtman H, Talangbayan H, Eilam D (1993) Environmental and behavioral components of sensitization induced by the dopamine agonist quinpirole. Behav Pharmacol 4: 405-410
30. Szechtman H, Dai H, Mustafa S, Einat H, Sullivan RM (1994a) Effects of dose and interdose interval on locomotor sensitization to the dopamine agonist quinpirole. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 48: 921-928
31. Szechtman H, Talangbayan H, Canaran G, Dai H, Eilam D (1994b) Dynamics of behavioral sensitization induced by the dopamine agonist quinpirole and a proposed central energy control mechanism. Psychopharmacology 115: 95-104
32. Tilson HA, Rech RH (1973) Conditioned drug effects and absence of tolerance to d-amphetamine induced motor activity. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1: 149-153
33. Wagner AR (1978) Expectencies and the priming of STM. In: Hulse SH, Fowler H, Honig KW (eds) Cognitive processes in animal behavior. Erlbaum, Hillsdale N.J., pp 177-209
34. Willner P, Papp S, Cheeta S, Muscat R (1992) Environmental influences on behavioural sensitization to the dopamine agonist quinpirole. Behav Pharmacol 3: 43-50
35. Zhou LW, Qin ZH, Weiss B (1991) Down-regulation of stereotyped behavior and production of latent locomotor behaviors in mice treated continuously with quinpirole. Neuropharmacology 4: 47-55