Phylogenetic trees based on gene content

Bioinformatics

Volumn 20, Issue 13, 2004, Pages 2044-2049

  Huson, Daniel H ^a   Steel, Mike ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOLUTION; GENETIC DISTANCE; GENETIC PARAMETERS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

EID: 4544229161     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 13674811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth198     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Cole,J.R., Chai,B., Marsh,T.L.,Farris,R.J., Wang,Q., Kulam,S.A., Chandra,S., McGarrell,D.M., Schmidt,T.M., Garrity,G.M. and Tiedje,J.M. (2003) The ribosomal database project (RDP-II): previewing a new autoaligner that allows regular updates and the new prokaryotic taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Res., 31, 442-443.
2. DeBry,R.W. and Slade,N.A. (1985) Cladistic analysis of restriction endonuclease cleavage map data within a maximum likelihood framework. Syst. Zool., 31, 21-34.
3. Farris,J.S. Phylogenetic analysis under Dollo's law. (1977) Syst. Zool., 26, 77-88.
4. Feller,W. (1950) An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications, 2nd edn. Vol. 1. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, pp. 407-436.
5. Felsenstein,J. (1989) PHYLIP - phylogeny inference package (version 3.2). Cladistics, 5, 164-166.
6. Fitz-Gibbon,S.T. and House,C.H. (1999) Whole gnome-based phylogenetic analysis of free-living microorganisms. Nucleic Acids Res., 27, 4218-4222.
7. Henz,S.R., Auch,A.F., Huson,D.H., Nieselt-Struwe,K. and Schuster,S.C. (2003) Whole genome-based prokaryotic phylogeny. ECCB Conference Proceedings, 23-25.
8. Karev,G.P., Wolf,Y.I. and Koonin,E.V. (2003) Simple stochastic birth and death models of genome evolution: was there enough time for us to evolve? Bioinformatics, 19, 1889-1900.
9. Kunin,V. and Ouzounis,C.A. (2003) GenTRACE - reconstruction of gene content of ancestral species. Bioinformatics, 19, 1412-1416.
10. Le Quesne,W.J. (1974) The uniquely evolved character and its cladistic application. Syst. Zool., 23, 513-517.
11. Rokas,A. and Holland,P.W.H. (2000) Rare genomic changes as a tool for phylogenetics. Trends Ecol. Evol., 15, 454-459.
12. Saitou,N. and Nei,M. (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol., 4, 406-425.
13. Sankoff,D. and Nadeau,J.H. (1996) Conserved synteny as a measure of genomic distance. Discr. Appl. Math., 71, 247-257.
14. Semple,C. and Steel,M.A. (2003) Phylogenetics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
15. Snel,B., Bork,P. and Huynen,M.A. (1999) Genome phylogeny based on gene content. Nature, 21, 108-110.
16. Swofford,D.L., Olsen,G.J., Waddell,P.J., and Hillis,D.M. (1996) Chapter 11: Phylogenetic inference, 2nd edn. In Hillis,D.M., Moritz,C. and Mable,B.K. (eds), Molecular Systematics. Sinauer Associates, Inc., pp. 407-514.
17. Wolf,Y.I., Rogozin,I.B., Grishin,N.V. and Koonin,E.V. (2002) Genome trees and the Tree of Life. Trends Genet., 18, 472-479.
18. Wolf,Y.I., Rogozin,I.B., Grishin,N.V., Tatusov,R.L. and Koonin,E.V. (2001) Genome trees constructed using five different approaches suggest new major bacterial clades. BMC Evol. Biol., 1, 8.