Effects of demecolcine and sucrose on the incidence of cytoplasmic protrusions containing chromosomes in pig oocytes matured in vitro

Journal of Reproduction and Development

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 117-121

  Miyoshi, Kazuchika ^a   Mori, Hironori ^a   Yamamoto, Hideki ^a   Kishimoto, Miki ^a   Yoshida, Mitsutoshi ^a  

^a KAGOSHIMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cytoplasmic protrusion; Demecolcine; Oocyte; Pig; Sucrose

Indexed keywords

DEMECOLCINE; SUCROSE; TUBULIN MODULATOR;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL NUCLEUS TRANSPLANTATION; CHROMOSOME; CLONING; CYTOPLASM; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; OOCYTE; SWINE; TIME;

ANIMALS; CHROMOSOMES; CLONING, ORGANISM; CYTOPLASM; DEMECOLCINE; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NUCLEAR TRANSFER TECHNIQUES; OOCYTES; SUCROSE; SWINE; TIME FACTORS; TUBULIN MODULATORS;

SUIDAE;

EID: 45349103385     PISSN: 09168818     EISSN: 13484400     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1262/jrd.19142     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Betthauser J, Forsberg E, Augenstein M, Child L, Eilertsen K, Enos J, Forsythe T, Golueke P, Jurgella G, Koppang R, Lesmeister T, Mallon K, Mell G, Misica P, Pace M, Pfister-Genskow M, Strelchenko N, Voelker G, Watt S, Thompson S, Bishop M. Production of cloned pigs from in vitro systems. Nat Biotech 2000; 18: 1055-1059.
2. Onishi A, Iwamoto M, Akita T, Mikawa S, Takeda K, Awata T, Hanada H, Perry ACF. Pig cloning by microinjection of fetal fibroblast nuclei. Science 2000; 289: 1188-1190.
3. Polejaeva IA, Chen SH, Vaught TD, Page RL, Mullins J, Ball S, Dai Y, Boone J, Walker S, Ayares DL, Colman A, Campbell KHS. Cloned pigs produced by nuclear transfer from adult somatic cells. Nature 2000; 407: 86-90.
4. Bondioli K, Ramsoondar J, Williams B, Costa C, Fodor W. Cloned pigs generated from cultured skin fibroblasts derived from a H-transferase transgenic boar. Mol Reprod Dev 2001; 60: 189-195.
5. Park KW, Cheong HT, Lai L, Im GS, Kuhholzer B, Bonk A, Samuel M, Rieke A, Day BN, Murohy CN, Carter DB, Prather RS. Production of nuclear transfer-derived swine that express the enhanced green fluorescent protein. Anim Biotech 2001; 12: 173-181.
6. Park KW, Lai L, Cheong HT, Cabot R, Sun QY, Wu G, Rucker EB, Durtschi D, Bonk A, Samuel M, Rieke A, Day BN, Murphy CN, Carter DB, Prather RS. Mosaic gene expression in nuclear transfer-derived embryos and the production of cloned transgenic pigs from ear-derived fibroblasts. Biol Reprod 2002; 66: 1001-1005.
7. Boquest AC, Grupen CG, Harrison SJ, Mcllfatrick SM, Ashman RJ, d'Apice AJF, Nottle MB. Production of cloned pigs from cultured fetal fibroblast cells. Biol Reprod 2002; 66: 1283-1287.
8. Dai Y, Vaught TD, Boone J, Chen SH, Phelps CJ, Ball S, Monahan JA, Jobst PM, McCreath KJ, Lamborn AE, Cowell-Lucero JL, Wells KD, Colman A, Polejaeva IA, Ayares DL. Targeted disruption of the α1,3- galactosyltransferase gene in cloned pigs. Nat Biotech 2002; 20: 251-255.
9. De Sausa PA, Dobrinsky JR, Zhu J, Archibald AL, Ainslie A, Bosma W, Bowering J, Bracken J, Ferrier PM, Fletcher J, Gasparrini B, Harkness L, Johnston P, Ritchie M, Ritchie WA, Travers A, Albertini D, Dinnyes A, King TJ, Wilmut I. Somatic cell nuclear transfer in the pig: control of pronuclear formation and integration with improved methods for activation and maintenance of pregnancy. Biol Reprod 2002; 66: 642-650.
10. Lai L, Kolber-Simonds D, Park KW, Cheong HT, Greenstein JL, Im GS, Samuel M, Bonk A, Rieke A, Day BN, Murphy CN, Carter DB, Hawley RJ, Prather RS. Production of α-1,3-galactosyltransferase knockout pigs by nuclear transfer cloning. Science 2002; 295: 1089-1092.
11. Lai L, Park KW, Cheong HT, Kuhholzer B, Samuel M, Bonk A, Im GS, Rieke A, Day BN, Murphy CN, Carter DB, Prather RS. Transgenic pig expressing the enhanced green fluorescent protein produced by nuclear transfer using colchicines-treated fibroblasts as donor cells. Mol Reprod Dev 2002; 62: 300-306.
12. Yin XJ, Tani T, Yonemura I, Kawakami M, Miyamoto K, Hasegawa R, Kato Y, Tsunoda Y. Production of cloned pigs from adult somatic cells by chemically assisted removal of maternal chromosomes. Biol Reprod 2002; 67: 442-446.
13. Bordignon V, Smith LC. Telophase enucleation: an improved method to prepare recipient cytoplasts for use in bovine nuclear transfer. Mol Reprod Dev 1998; 49: 29-36.
14. Nour MS, Takahashi Y. Preparation of young preactivated oocytes with high enucleation efficiency for bovine nuclear transfer. Theriogenology 1999; 51: 661-666.
15. Dominko T, Chan A, Simerly C, Luetjens CM, Hewitson L, Martinovich C, Schatten G. Dynamic imaging of the metaphase II spindle and maternal chromosomes in bovine oocytes: implications for enucleation efficiency verification, avoidance of parthenogenesis, and successful embryogenesis. Biol Reprod 2000; 62: 150-154.
16. Liu JL, Wang MK, Sun QY, Xu Z, Chen DY. Effect of telophase enucleation on bovine somatic nuclear transfer. Theriogenology 2000; 54: 989-998.
17. Smith LC. Membrane and intracellular effects of ultraviolet irradiation with Hoechst 33342 on bovine secondary oocytes matured in vitro. J Reprod Fertil 1993; 99: 39-44.
18. Tao T, Machaty Z, Abeydeera LR, Day BN, Prather RS. Optimisation of porcine oocyte activation following nuclear transfer. Zygote 2000; 8: 69-77.
19. Kawakami M, Tani T, Yabuuchi A, Kobayashi T, Murakami H, Fujimura T, Kato Y, Tsunoda Y. Effect of demecolcine and nocodazole on the efficiency of chemically assisted removal of chromosomes and the developmental potential of nuclear transferred porcine oocytes. Cloning Stem Cells 2003; 5: 379-387.
20. Miyoshi K, Inoue S, Himaki T, Mikawa S, Yoshida M. Birth of cloned miniature pigs derived from somatic cell nuclear transferred embryos activated by ultrasound treatment. Mol Reprod Dev 2007; 74: 1568-1574.
21. Wang MK, Liu JL, Li GP, Lian L, Chen DY. Sucrose pretreatment for enucleation: an efficient and nondamage method for removing the spindle of the mouse MII oocyte. Mol Reprod Dev 2001; 58: 432-436.
22. Liu JL, Sung LY, Tian XC, Yang X. Hypertonicity-induced projections reflect cell polarity in mouse metaphase II oocytes: involvement of microtubules, microfilaments, and chromosomes. Biol Reprod 2002; 67: 1853-1863.
23. Liu JL, Sung LY, Barber M, Yang X. Hypertonic medium treatment for localization of nuclear material in bovine metaphase II oocytes. Biol Reprod 2002; 66: 1342-1349.
24. Szell A, Shelton JN. Osmotic and cryoprotective effects of glycerol-sucrose solution on day-3 mouse embryo. J Reprod Fertil 1987; 80: 309-316.
25. Oda K, Gibbons WE, Leibo SP. Osmotic shock of fertilized mouse ova. J Reprod Fertil 1992; 95: 737-747.
26. Saito N, Imai K, Tomizawa M. Effect of sugars-addition on the survival of vitrified bovine blastocysts produced in vitro. Theriogenology 1994; 41: 1053-1060.
27. Otoi T, Yamamoto K, Koyama N, Tachikawa S, Suzuki T. Cryopreservation of mature bovine oocytes by vitrification in straws. Cryobiology 1998; 37: 77-85.
28. Tani T, Shimada H, Kato Y, Tsunoda Y. Demecolcine-assisted enucleation for bovine cloning. Cloning Stem Cells 2006; 8: 61-66.
29. Petters RM, Wells KD. Culture of pig embryos. J Reprod Fertil 1993; 48 (Suppl): 61-73.