Functional group and substructure searching as a tool in metabolomics

PLoS ONE

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2008, Pages

  Kotera, Masaaki ^a   McDonald, Andrew G ^a   Boyce, Sinéad ^a   Tipton, Keith F ^a  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

5 METHYLDEOXYCYTIDINE; CYCLOHEXANOL; CYCLOPENTANOL; CYTIDINE DERIVATIVE; DEOXY 5 METHYLCYTIDYLATE; ENZYME INHIBITOR; PENTANOL; ORGANIC COMPOUND;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; DATA BASE; DRUG DESIGN; ENZYME MECHANISM; ENZYME STRUCTURE; ENZYME SUBSTRATE; ENZYMOLOGY; INTERNET; METABOLOMICS; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; FACTUAL DATABASE; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, FACTUAL; INTERNET; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; ORGANIC CHEMICALS;

EID: 45249119321     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001537     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Fox RB, Powell WH, eds. Nomenclature of Organic Compounds: Principles and Practice, 2nd Ed. Oxford, New York American Chemical Society, Washington, DC/Oxford University Press.
2. International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry, Commission on the Nomenclature of Organic Chemistry (1979) The Nomenclature of Organic Chemistry. Sections A, B, C, D, E, F and H, Pergamon, Oxford. http://www.iupac.org.
3. Leigh GJ, Favre HA, Metanomski WV (1998) Principles of Chemical Nomenclature: A Guide to IUPAC Recommendations. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science.
4. Wisniewski JL (1998) Nomenclature: automatic generation and conversion. In: Schleyer Pvon R, Allinger NL, Clarl; Gasteiger J, Kollman PA, Schaefer HF, Schreiner PR, eds. Encyclopedia of Computational Chemistry. Chichester: Wiley. pp 1881-1894.
5. Poolman MG, Bonde BK, Gevorgyan A, Patel HH, Fell DA (2006) Challenges to be faced in the reconstruction of metabolic networks from public databases. IEE Proc Syst Biol 153: 379-384.
6. Khedkar SA, Malde AK, Coutinho EC, Srivastava S (2007) Pharmacophore modeling in drug discovery and development: an overview. Med Chem 3: 187-197.
7. Chang C, Ekins S, Bahadduri P, Swaan PW (2006) Pharmacophore-based discovery of ligands for drug-transporters. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 58: 1431-11450.
8. Arimoto R (2006) Computational models for predicting interactions with cytochrome p430 enzyme. Curr Topics Med Chem 6: 1609-1618.
9. Poroikov VV, Filimonov DA , Ihlenfeldt WD, Gloriozova TA, Lagunin AA, et al. (2003) PASS biological activity spectrum predictions in the Enhanced Open NCI Datacase Browser. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 43: 228-236.
10. Oellien F, Ihlenfeldt WD, Johann Gasteiger J (2005) InfVis - platform-independent visual data mining of multidimensional chemical data sets. J Chem Inf. Model 45: 1456-1467.
11. Nicolaou CA, Brown N, Pattichis CS (2007) Molecular optimization using computational multiobjective methods. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel 10.
12. Richmond NJ, Abrams CA, Wolohan PRN, Abrahamian E, Wilett P, et al. (2006) GALAHAD: 1. Pharmacophore identification by hypermolecular alignment of ligands in 3D. J Comput Aided Mol Des 20: 567-587.
13. Chen B, Harrison RF, Papadatos G, Willett P, Wood DJ, et al. (2007) Evaluation of machine-learning methods for ligand-based virtual screening. J Comput Aided Mol Des 21: 53-62.
14. Polanski J (2003) Self-organizing neural networks for pharmacophore mapping. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 55: 1149-1162.
15. Muegge I (2002) Pharmacophore features of potential drugs. Chem Eur J 8: 1976-1981.
16. Schwab W (2003) Metabolome diversity: too few genes, too many metabolites? Phytochemistry 62: 837-849.
17. Hult K, Berglund P (2007) Enzyme promiscuity: mechanism and applications. Trends Biochem 25: 231-238.
18. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Hattori M, Aoki-Kinoshita KF, Itoh M, et al. (2006) From genomics to chemical genomics: new developments in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Res 34: D354-357.
19. Ihlenfeldt WD, Gasteiger J (1994) Hash codes for the identification and classification of molecular structure elements. J Comput Chem 15: 793-813.
20. Ihlenfeldt WD, Voigt JH, Bienfait B, Oellien F, Nicklaus MC (2002) Enhanced CACTVS browser of the open NCI Database. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 42: 46-57.
21. McDonald AG, Boyce S, Moss GP, Dixon HBF, Tipton KF (2007) ExplorEnz: a MySQL database of the IUBMB Enzyme Nomenclature. BMC Biochem 8: 14.
22. Dalby A, Nourse JG, Hounshell WD, Gushrst AKI, Grier DL, et al. (1992) Description of several chemical structure file formats used by computer programs developed at Molecular Design Limited. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 32: 244-255.
23. Kotera M, Hattori M, Oh M, Yamamoto R, Komeno T, et al. (2004) RFAIR: a reactant-pair database representing chemical changes in enzymatic reactions. Genome Inform 15: P062.
24. Kotera M, Okuno Y, Hattori M, Goto S, Kanehisa M (2004) Computational assignment of the EC numbers for genomic-scale analysis of enzymatic reactions. J Am Chem Soc 126: 16487-16498.
25. Hofmann O, Schomburg D (2005) Concept-based annotation of enzyme classes. Bioinformatics 21: 2059-2066.
26. Antal J, Pal G, Asboth B, Buzas Z, Patthy A, Graf L (2001) Specificity assay of serine proteinases by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography analysis of competing oligopeptide substrate library. Anal Biochem 288: 156-167.
27. Ellis LB, Roe D, Wackett LP (2006) The University of Minnesota Biocatalysis/ Biodegradation Database: the first decade. Nucleic Acids Res 34 (Database issue): D517-21.
28. Wiswesser WJ (1954) A Line-Formula Chemical Notation New York: Thomas Crowell.
29. Wiswesser WJ (1982) How the WLN began in 1949 and how it might be in 1999. J Chem Comput Sci 22: 88-93.
30. Wiswesser WJ (1985) Historic development of chemical notations. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 25: 258-263.
31. Barnard JM, Jochum CJ, Welford SM (1989) ROSDAL: A universal structure/ substructure representation for PC-host communication. In: Warr WA, ed. Chemical Structure Information Systems Interfaces, Communication and Standards, ACS Symposium Series. No. 400. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society. pp 76-81.
32. Weininger D (1988) SMILES 1. Introduction and encoding rules. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 28: 31-36. http://www.daylight.com
33. Weininger D (1990) SMILES 3. DEPICT. Graphical depiction of chemical structures. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 30(3): 237-243.
34. Ash S, Cline MA, Horner RW, Hurst T., Smith GB (1997). SYBYL Line Notation (SLN): A versatile language for chemical structure representation. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 37: 71-79.
35. Coles SJ, Day NE, Murray-Rust P, Rzepa, HS, Zhang Y (2005) Enhancement of the chemical semantic web through the use of InChI identifiers. Org Biomol Chem 3: 1832-1834.
36. Raymond JW, Willett P (2002) Maximum common subgraph isomorphism algorithms for the matching of chemical structures. J. Comput-Aided Mol Des 16: 521-533.
37. Raymond JW, Gardiner EJ, Willett P (2002) RASCAL: Calculation of graph similarity using maximum common edge subgraphs. Comput J 45: 631-644.
38. Raymond JW, Gardiner EJ, Willett P (2002) Heuristics for similarity searching of chemical graphs using a maximum common edge-subgraph algorithm. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 42: 305-316.
39. Hattori M, Okuno Y, Goto S, Kanehisa M (2003) Development of a chemical structure comparison method for integrated analysis of chemical and genomic information in the metabolic pathways. J Am Chem Soc 125: 11853-11865.
40. Flower DR (1998) On the properties of bit string-based measures of chemical similarity. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 38: 379-386.
41. Allen FH, Kennard O (1993) 3D search and research using the Cambridge structural database. Chem Des Autom News 8: 1 and 31-37.
42. Brown RD, Martin YC (1996) Use of structure-activity data to compare structure-based clustering methods and descriptors for use in compound selection. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 36: 572-584.
43. Brown RD, Martin YC (1997) The information content of 2D and 3D structural descriptors relevant to ligand-receptor binding. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 37: 1-9.
44. Bayada DM, Hamersma H, van Geerestein VJ (1999) Molecular diversity and representativity in chemical databases. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 39: 1-10.
45. Wild D, Blankley CJ (2000) Comparison of 2D fingerprint types and hierarchy level selection methods for structural grouping using Ward's clustering. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 40: 155-162.
46. James CA, Weininger D, Delany J. (2000) Daylight Theory Manual 4.71; Irvine, CA: Daylight Chemical Information Systems, Inc.
47. Greene N, Erhardt PW, eds (1999) Knowledge-based expert systems for toxicity and metabolism prediction: Drug Metabolism: London: Blackwell Science Ltd. pp 289-296.
48. Klopman G, Tu M (1997) Structure-biodegradability study and computer-automated prediction of aerobic biodegradation of chemicals. Environ Toxicol Chem 16: 1829-1835.
49. Bush BL, Sheridan RP (1993) PATTY: A programmable atom typer and language for automatic classification of atoms in molecular databases. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 33: 756-762.
50. Lipinski CA, Lombardo F, Dominy BW, Feeny PJ (1997) Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 23: 3-25.