Concept-based annotation of enzyme classes

Bioinformatics

Volumn 21, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 2059-2066

  Hofmann, Oliver ^a   Schomburg, Dietmar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; ENZYME ANALYSIS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LINGUISTICS; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SCORING SYSTEM; SEMANTICS; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 18744408163     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 13674811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti284     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Aronson,A. (2001) Effecfive mapping of biomedical text to the UMLS Metathesaurus: the MetaMap program. Proc. AMIA Symp., 17-21.
2. Aronson,A.R. (2002) Filtering the UMLS Metathesaurus forMetaMap. Technical report, Semantic Knowledge Representation Group.
3. Aronson,A.R. and Rindflesch,T.C. (1997) Query expansion using the UMLS Metathesaurus. Proc. AM1A Annu. Fall Symp., pp. 485-489.
4. Benson,D.A. et al. (2003) GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res., 31, 23-27.
5. Berman,H. et al. (2000) The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res., 28, 235-242.
6. Blaschke,C. et al. (1999) Automatic extraction of biological information from scienfific text: protein-protein interactions. Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. Syst. Mol. Biol., 60-67.
7. Bodenreider,O. (2004) The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS): integrating biomedical terminology. Nucleic Acids Res., 32 (Database issue), D267-D270.
8. Bodenreider,O., Rindflesch,T. and Burgun,A. (2002) Unsupervised, corpus-based method for extending a biomedical terminology. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Natural Language Processing in the Biomedical Domain, Associafion for Computational Linguistics, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 53-60.
9. Cabezas,C., Resnik,P. and Stevens,J. (2001) Supervised sense tagging using support vector machines. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Evaluating Word Sense Disambiguation Systems, Toulouse, France, 59-62.
10. Camon,E. et al. (2004) The Gene ontology annotation (GOA) database: sharing knowledge in Uniprot with gene ontology. Nucleic Acids Res., 32 (Database issue), D262-D266.
11. Chang,J. et al. (2001) Including biological literature improvesl, homology search. Pac. Symp. Biocomput., 374-383.
12. de Bruijn,B. and Martin,J. (2002) Literature mining in molecular biology. In Proceedings of the EFMI Workshop on Natural Language Processing in Biomedical Applications, Baud R. and Ruch P. (eds), Nicosia, Cyprus, pp. 1-5.
13. Demsar,J. and Zupan,B. (2004) Orange: from experimental machine learning to interactive data mining. White paper, Faculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana.
14. Ding,J. et al. (2002) Mining MedLine: abstracts, sentences, or phrases? Pac. Symp. Biocomput., 326-337.
15. Dobrokhotov,P.B. et al. (2003) Combining NLP and probabilistic categorisation for document and term selection for Swiss-Prot medical annotation. Bioinformatics, 19 (Suppl 1), i91-i94.
16. Donaldson,I. et al. (2003) PreBIND and Textomy - mining the biomedical literature for protein-protein interactions using a support vector machine. BMC Bioinformatics, 4, 11.
17. Feldman,R. et al. (2003) Mining the biomedical literature using semantic analysis of natural language processing techniques. Biosilico, 1, 69-80.
18. Fell,D.A. and Wagner,A. (2000) The small world of metabolism. Nat. Biotechnol., 18, 1121-1122.
19. Galperin,M.Y. (2004) The molecular biology database collection: 2004 update. Nucleic Acids Res., 32 (Database issue), D3-D22.
20. Hirschman,L. et al. (2002) Accomplishments and challenges in literature data mining for biology. Bioinformatics, 18, 1553-1561.
21. Humphreys,K. et al. (2000) Two applications of information extraction to biological science journal articles: enzyme interactions and protein structures. Pac. Symp. Biocomput., 505-516.
22. Jenssen,T. et al. (2001) A literature network of human genes for high-throughput analysis of gene expression. Nat. Genet., 28, 21-28.
23. Jeong,H. et al. (2001) Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature, 411, 41-42.
24. Jeong,H. et al. (2000) The large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature, 407, 651-654.
25. Kanehisa,M. et al. (2002) The KEGG databases at GenomeNet. Nucleic Acids Res., 30, 42-46.
26. Kazama,J., Makino,T., Ohta,Y. and Tsujii,J. (2002) Tuning support vector machines for biomedical named entity recognition. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Natural Language Processing in the Biomedical Domain, Association for Computational Linguistics, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 1-8.
27. Lemke,N. et al. (2004) Essentiality and damage in metabolic networks. Bioinformatics, 20, 115-119.
28. Liu,H. et al. (2002) Automatic resolution of ambiguous terms based on machine learning and conceptual relations in the UMLS. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 9, 621-636.
29. Marcotte,E.M. et al. (2001) Mining literature for protein-protein interactions. Bioinformatics, 17, 359-363.
30. McKusick,V (2000) Online mendelian inheritance in man OMIM (TM). Technical report, McKusick-Nathans Institute for Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University (Baltimore, MD) and National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine (Bethesda, MD).
31. Mutalik,P. et al. (2001) Use of general-purpose negation detection to augment concept indexing of medical documents: a quantitative study using the UMLS. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 8, 598-609.
32. Newman,M.E. (2001) The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 404-409.
33. Ono,T. et al. (2001) Automated extraction of information on protein-protein interactions from the biological literature. Bioinformatics, 17, 155-161.
34. Pisanelli,D.M. et al. (1998) An ontological analysis of the UMLS Methathesaurus. Proc. AMIA Symp., 810-814.
35. Pratt,W. and Yetisgen-Yildiz,M. (2003) LitLinker: capturing connections across the biomedical literature. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Capture, ACM Press pp. 105-112. ISBN 1-58113-583-1.
36. Pustejovsky,J. et al. (2002) Robust relational parsing over biomedical literature: extracting inhibit relations. Pac. Symp. Biocomput., 362-373.
37. Rindflesch,T.C., Rajan,J.V. and Lawrence,H. (2000a) Extracting molecular binding relationships from biomedical text. In Applied Natural Language Processing Conference, Seattle, WA, pp. 188-195.
38. Rindflesch,T.C. et al. (2000b) EDGAR: extraction of drugs, genes and relations from the biomedical literature. Pac. Symp. Biocomput., 517-528.
39. Schomburg,I. et al. (2004) BRENDA, the enzyme database: updates and major new developments. Nucleic Acids Res., 32 (Database issue), D431-D433.
40. Stapley,B. and Benoit,G. (2000) Biobibliometrics: information retrieval and visualization from co-occurrences of gene names in MedLine abstracts. Pac. Symp. Biocomput., 529-540.
41. Steyvers,M. and Tenenbaum,J.B. (2005) The large-scale structure of semantic networks: Statistical analysis and a model of semantic growth. Cognitive Science, 29.
42. Strogatz,S.H. (2001) Exploring complex networks. Nature, 410, 268-276.
43. Tao,Y.-C. and Leibel,R. (2002) Identifying functional relationships among human genes by systematic analysis of biological literature. BMC Bioinformatics, 3, 16.
44. Temkin,J.M. and Gilder,M.R. (2003) Extraction of protein interaction information from unstructured text using a context-free grammar. Bioinformatics, 19, 2046-2053.
45. TouchGraph (2002) TouchGraph LLC. Technical report, Open Source.
46. Watts,D.J. and Strogatz,S.H. (1998) Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature, 393, 440-442.
47. Weeber,M. et al. (2001) Using concepts in literature-based discovery: Simulating Swanson's Raynaud-fish oil and migraine-magnesium discoveries. JASIST, 52, 548-577.
48. Wren,J.D. and Garner,H.R. (2004) Shared relationship analysis: ranking set cohesion and commonalities within a literature-derived relationship network. Bioinformatics, 20, 191-198.
49. Wren,J.D. et al. (2004) Knowledge discovery by automated identification and ranking of implicit relationships. Bioinformatics, 20, 389-398.
50. Yang,Y. (1999) An evaluation of statistical approaches to text categorization. Information Retrieval, 1, 69-90.
51. Yeh,A.S. et al. (2003) Evaluation of text data mining for database curation: lessons learned from the KDD Challenge Cup. Bioinformatics, 19 (Suppl 1), 1331-1339.