Future issues in transplantation ethics: ethical and legal controversies in xenotransplantation, stem cell, and cloning research

Transplantation Reviews

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 210-214

  Shapiro, Robyn S ^a  

^a Medical College of Wisconsin Center for the Study of Bioethics   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE AGENT;

ALLOGRAFT; ANIMAL WELFARE; ARTICLE; DISEASE TRANSMISSION; EMBRYO RESEARCH; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; ETHICAL DECISION MAKING; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; HUMAN CLONING; HUMAN EMBRYO; INFECTION RISK; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; NIDATION; NONHUMAN; ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SAFETY; STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION; TRANSGENIC ANIMAL; UNITED STATES; XENOTRANSPLANTATION; ZOONOSIS;

EID: 45149104917     PISSN: 0955470X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2008.04.004     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. United Network for Organ Sharing. Web site. http://www.unos.org Accessed October 23, 2007
2. US Department of Health and Human Services. 2006 Annual report of the US Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients: Transplant Data 1996-2005. Health Resources and Services Administration, Healthcare Systems Bureau, Division of Transplantation. Web site. http://www.optn.org/AR2006/106_dh.htm Accessed October 23, 2007
3. US Public Health Service. PHS guideline on infectious disease issues in xenotransplantation. http://www.fda.gov/cber/gdlns/xenophs0101.pdf Published January 19, 2001 at 15. Accessed October 23, 2007
4. Hughes J. Xenografting: ethical issues. J Med Ethics 24 (1998) 18
5. McCarthy C.R. Ethical aspects of animal-to-human xenografts. Inst Lab Anim Resources 37 (1995) 3
6. Karesh W.B., and Cook R.A. The human-animal link. Foreign Affairs 84 (2005) 38
7. Nicholas J.M., and Fishman J.A. Infectious risk in xenotransplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 11 (2006) 180
8. 45 CFR 46.116(a); 21 CFR 50.25(a).
9. US Department of Health and Human Services. Informed consent in clinical research involving xenotransplantation (draft), Secretary's Advisory Committee on Xenotransplantation. Web site. http://www4.od.nih.gov/oba/SACX/reports/IC_draft_030905.pdf Published June 2004. Accessed October 23, 2007
10. Sykes M., d'Apice A., and Sandrin M. Position paper of ethics committee of the International Xenotransplantation Association. Xenotransplantation 20 (2003) 194
11. Sykes M. Commentary: World Health Assembly resolution 57.18 on Xenotransplantation. Transplantation 79 (2005) 636
12. Jacobson v Mass, 197 U.S. 11 (1905).
13. Compagnie Francaise De Navigation a Vapeur v State Bd of Health, La. 186 U.S. 380 (1902).
14. Gibbons v Ogden, 22 U.S. 1 (1824).
15. 45 CFR 46.116(a)(8).
16. Charo R.A. Ethics and public policy. Hofstra L Rev 27 (1999) 503
17. President's Council on Bioethics. Human cloning and human dignity: an ethical inquiry 80 (2002)
18. Jaenisch R. Human cloning-the science and ethics of nuclear transplantation. New Eng J Med 351 (2004) 2787
19. Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 108-447, § 509, 118 Stat. 2809, 3163-64 (2004).
20. Exec. Order No. 13,435, 72 Fed. Reg. 34,589 (June 22, 2007).
21. S.368, 105th Cong § 1 (1997) (introduced on Feb. 27, 1997 by Senator Bond).
22. Human Cloning Prohibition Act, H.R. 923, 105th Cong § 1 (1997) (introduced on March 5, 1997 by Representative Ehlers).
23. Memorandum on the prohibition on federal funding for cloning of human beings. 1 Pub Papers 233, 281 (March 4, 1997). This directive was integrated into the 2000 Research Guidelines for Research on Pluripotent Stem Cells, 65 Fed. Reg. 51, 976 (August 25, 2000).
24. Ark. Code Ann § 20-16-1002 (West 2005).
25. Ind. Code §§ 16-18-2-56.5, 16-21-3-4, 25-22.5-8-5, 35-46-5-2, 35-46-5-3 (2005).
26. Iowa Code Ann. §§ 707B. 2, 707B.4 (West 2005).
27. Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. §§ 333. 16274, 333.16275 (West 2005).
28. N.D. Cent. Code § 12.1-39-02 (2005).
29. S.D. Codified Laws §§ 34-14-26 to 34-14-28 (2005).
30. Coleman J. Consent, playing God or playing scientist: a constitutional analysis of laws banning embryological procedures. Pacific LJ 27 (1996) 1386
31. Meyer v State of Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390 (1923).