Extended parallel process model and H5N1 influenza virus

Psychological Reports

Volumn 102, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 539-550

  Siu, Wanda ^a  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ASIA; ASSOCIATION; AVIAN INFLUENZA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EPIDEMIC; EUROPE; FEAR; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HONG KONG; HUMAN; INFLUENZA; INFLUENZA VIRUS A H5N1; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; POULTRY; PRIMARY PREVENTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SELF CONCEPT; STUDENT; UNITED STATES; VIOLENCE; VIROLOGY;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANIMALS; ASIA; CUES; DANGEROUS BEHAVIOR; DISEASE OUTBREAKS; EUROPE; FEAR; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HONG KONG; HUMANS; INFLUENZA A VIRUS, H5N1 SUBTYPE; INFLUENZA IN BIRDS; INFLUENZA, HUMAN; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; POULTRY; PRIMARY PREVENTION; SELF EFFICACY; STUDENTS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 45149101813     PISSN: 00332941     EISSN: 1558691X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/PR0.102.2.539-550     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. BENTLER, P. M. (1990) Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
2. BENTLER, P. M., & BONETT, D. G. (1980) Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
3. DEGELMAN, D., & OWENS, S. A. (2005) Psychological testing: student guide. Costa Mesa, CA: Vanguard Univer.
4. GARDNER, M. P. (1985) Does attitude toward the ad affect brand attitude under a brand evaluation set? Journal of Marketing Research, 22, 192-198.
5. GORE, T. D., & BRACKEN, C. C. (2005) Testing the theoretical design of a health risk message: re-examining the major tenets of the Extended Parallel Process Model. Health Education & Behavior, 32, 27-41.
6. HELMES, A. W. (2002) Application of the protection motivation theory to genetic testing for breast cancer. Preventive Medicine: An International Journal Devoted to Practice and Theory, 35, 453-462.
7. JANIS, I. L. (1967) Effects of fear arousal and attitude change: recent developments in theory and experimental research. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 3. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 166-225.
8. JANIS, I. L., & FESHBACH, S. (1954) Personality differences associated with responsiveness to fear-arousing communications. Journal of Personality, 23, 154-166.
9. JÖRESKOG, K. G., & SÖRBOM, D. (2003) LISREL 8 user's reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software.
10. LEVENTHAL, H. (1970) Findings and theory in the study of fear communications. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 5. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 119-186.
11. MARUYAMA, G. M. (1998) Basics of structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. MCCROSKEY, J. C., & TEVEN, J. J. (1999) Goodwill: a reexamination of the construct and its measurement. Communication Monographs, 66, 90-103.
13. MCGUIRE, W. J. (1968) Personality and susceptibility to social influence. In E. Borgatta & W. Lambert (Eds.), Handbook of personality theory and research. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally. Pp. 1130-1187.
14. MCGUIRE, W. J. (1969) The nature of attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology. Vol. 3. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Pp. 136-314.
15. PERLOFF, R. M. (2003) The dynamics of persuasion: communication and attitudes in the 21st century. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. PETTY, R. E., & CACIOPPO, J. T. (1977) Forewarning, cognitive responding, and resistance to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 645-655.
17. PETTY, R. E., & CACIOPPO, J. T. (1979) Effects of forewarning of persuasive intent and involvement on cognitive responses and persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 173-176.
18. PETTY, R. E., & CACIOPPO, J. T. (1986) Communication and persuasion: central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
19. ROGERS, R. W. (1983) Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: a revised theory of protection motivation. In J. Cacioppo & R. E. Petty (Eds.), Social psychology. New York: Guilford. Pp. 153-176.
20. WITTE, K. (1992) Putting the fear back into fear appeals: the Extended Parallel Process Model. Communication Monographs, 59, 329-349.
21. WITTE, K. (1994) Fear control and danger control: a test of the Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM). Communication Monographs, 61, 113-134.
22. WITTE, K., & ALLEN, M. (2000) A meta-analysis of fear appeals: implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education & Behavior, 27, 591-615.
23. WITTE, K., MEYER, G., & MARTELL, D. (2001) Effective health risk messages: a step-by-step guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. WITTE, K., & MORRISON, K. (2000) Examining the influence of trait anxiety/repression-sensitization on individuals' reactions to fear appeals. Western Journal of Communication, 64, 1-27.