Silent synapses, LTP, and the indirect parallel-fibre pathway: Computational consequences of optimal cerebellar noise-processing

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 4, Issue 5, 2008, Pages

  Porrill, John ^a   Dean, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE FILTERING; BRAIN; EYE MOVEMENTS; FIBERS; NEURONS;

COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; COMPUTATIONAL CONSEQUENCES; FILTER MODEL; MOTOR LEARNING; MULTIPLE LEVELS; MULTIPLE SCALE; NEURAL SYSTEMS; NOISE PROCESSING; PARALLEL FIBERS; PURKINJE CELLS;

ADAPTIVE FILTERS;

ARTICLE; CEREBELLUM; LEARNING; LONG TERM DEPRESSION; LONG TERM POTENTIATION; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MODEL; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NERVE FIBER; NOISE; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; PURKINJE CELL; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; SIMULATION; SYNAPSE; VESTIBULOOCULAR REFLEX; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; NERVE CELL INHIBITION; NERVE TRACT; PHYSIOLOGY; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION;

ANIMALS; CEREBELLUM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; LONG-TERM POTENTIATION; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; NERVE NET; NEURAL INHIBITION; NEURAL PATHWAYS; REFLEX, VESTIBULO-OCULAR; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES; SYNAPSES; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION;

EID: 44949240468     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000085     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Eccles JC, Ito M, Szentágothai J (1967) The Cerebellum as a Neuronal Machine. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
2. Marr D (1969) A theory of cerebellar cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 202: 437-470.
3. Albus JS (1971) A theory of cerebellar function. Math Biosci 10: 25-61.
4. Fujita M (1982) Adaptive filter model of the cerebellum. Biol Cybern 45: 195-206.
5. Barlow JS (2002) The Cerebellum and Adaptive Control. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Ito M (2006) Cerebellar circuitry as a neuronal machine. Prog Neurobiol 78: 272-303.
7. Bartha GT, Thompson RF, Gluck MA (1991) Sensorimotor learning and the cerebellum. In: Arbib M, Ewert J-P, eds. Visual structures and integrated functions. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. pp 381-396.
8. Gomi H, Kawato M (1992) Adaptive feedback control models of the vestibulocerebellum and spinocerebellum. Biol Cybern 68: 105-114.
9. Coenen OJMD, Sejnowski TJ (1996) Learning to make predictions in the cerebellum may explain the anticipatory modulation of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain with vergence. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Joint Symposium on Neural Computation. University of California San Diego: Institute of Neural Computation. pp 202-221.
10. Kettner RE, Mahamud S, Leung HC, Sitkoff N, Houk JC, et al. (1997) Prediction of complex two-dimensional trajectories by a cerebellar model of smooth pursuit eye movement. J Neurophysiol 77: 2115-2130.
11. Schweighofer N, Spoelstra J, Arbib MA, Kawato M (1998) Role of the cerebellum in reaching movements in humans. II. A neural model of the intermediate cerebellum. Eur J Neurosci 10: 95-105.
12. Medina JF, Nores WL, Mauk MD (2002) Inhibition of climbing fibres is a signal for the extinction of conditioned eyelid responses. Nature 416: 330-333.
13. Yamamoto K, Kobayashi Y, Takemura A, Kawano K, Kawato M (2002) Computational studies on acquisition and adaptation of ocular following responses based on cerebellar synaptic plasticity. J Neurophysiol 87: 1554-1571.
14. Dean P, Porrill J, Stone JV (2002) Decorrelation control by the cerebellum achieves oculomotor plant compensation in simulated vestibulo-ocular reflex. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 269: 1895-1904.
15. Porrill J, Dean P, Stone JV (2004) Recurrent cerebellar architecture solves the motor error problem. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 271: 789-796.
16. Porrill J, Dean P (2007) Recurrent cerebellar loops simplify adaptive control of redundant and nonlinear motor systems. Neural Comput 19: 170-193.
17. Porrill J, Dean P (2007) Cerebellar motor learning: when is cortical plasticity not enough? PLoS Comp Biol 3: 1935-1950.
18. Jordan MI (1996) Computational aspects of motor control and motor learning. In: Heuer H, Keele S, eds. Handbook of Perception and Action, Volume 2: Motor Skills. London: Academic Press. pp 71-120.
19. Jordan MI, Wolpert DM (2000) Computational Motor Control. In: Gazzaniga MS, ed. The New Cognitive Neurosciences. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. pp 601-618.
20. Stein RB, Gossen ER, Jones KE (2005) Neuronal variability: noise or part of the signal? Nature Rev Neurosci 6: 389-397.
21. Marr D (1982) Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
22. Kawato M (1995) Cerebellum and Motor Control. In: Arbib MA, ed. The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. pp 172-178.
23. Sejnowski TJ (1977) Storing covariance with nonlinearly interacting neurons. J Math Biol 4: 303-321.
24. Widrow B, Stearns SD (1985) Adaptive Signal Processing. Engelwood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
25. Jörntell H, Hansel C (2006) Synaptic memories upside down: bidirectional plasticity at cerebellar parallel fiber-Purkinje cell synapses. Neuron 52: 227-238.
26. Boyden ES, Katoh A, Raymond JL (2004) Cerebellum-dependent learning: the role of multiple plasticity mechanisms. Annu Rev Neurosci 27: 581-609.
27. Ernst MO, Banks MS (2002) Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415: 429-433.
28. Osborne LC, Lisberger SG, Bialek W (2005) A sensory source for motor variation. Nature 437: 412-416.
29. Ito M (1984) The cerebellum and neural control. New York: Raven Press.
30. Isope P, Barbour B (2002) Properties of unitary granule cell - > Purkinje cell synapses in adult rat cerebellar slices. J Neurosci 22: 9668-9678.
31. Jörntell H, Ekerot CF (2002) Receptive field plasticity profoundly alters the cutaneous parallel fiber synaptic input to cerebellar interneurons in vivo. J Neurosci 23: 9620-9631.
32. Ekerot CF, Jorntell H (2003) Parallel fiber receptive fields: a key to understanding cerebellar operation and learning. Cerebellum 2: 101-109.
33. Boyden ES, Raymond JL (2003) Active reversal of motor memories reveals rules governing memory encoding. Neuron 39: 1031-1042.
34. Osborne LC, Hohl SS, Bialek W, Lisberger SG (2007) Time course of precision in smooth-pursuit eye movements of monkeys. J Neurosci 27: 2987-2998.
35. Krauzlis RJ (2004) Recasting the smooth pursuit eye movement system. J Neurophysiol 91: 591-603.
36. Medina JF, Lisberger SG (2007) Variation, signal, and noise in cerebellar sensory-motor processing for smooth-pursuit eye movements. J Neurosci 27: 6832-6842.
37. Kimpo RR, Boyden ES, Katoh A, Ke MC, Raymond JL (2005) Distinct patterns of stimulus generalization of increases and decreases in VOR gain. J Neurophysiol 94: 3092-3100.
38. Boyden ES, Katoh A, Pyle JL, Chatila TA, Tsien RW, et al. (2006) Selective engagement of plasticity mechanisms for motor memory storage. Neuron 51: 823-834.
39. Hansel C, de Jeu M, Belmeguenai A, Houtman SH, Buitendijk GH, et al. (2006) alphaCaMKII Is essential for cerebellar LTD and motor learning. Neuron 51: 835-843.
40. Cohen MR, Meissner GW, Schafer RJ, Raymond JL (2004) Reversal of motor learning in the vestibulo-ocular reflex in the absence of visual input. Learn Mem 11.
41. Kuki Y, Hirata Y, Blazquez PM, Heiney SA, Highstein SM (2004) Memory retention of vestibuloocular reflex motor learning in squirrel monkeys. NeuroReport 15: 1007-1011.
42. Kehoe EJ (2006) Repeated acquisitions and extinctions in classical conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response. Learn Mem 13: 366-375.
43. Jirenhed DA, Bengtsson F, Hesslow G (2007) Acquisition, extinction, and reacquisition of a cerebellar cortical memory trace. J Neurosci 27: 2493-2502.
44. De Zeeuw CI, Yeo CH (2005) Time and tide in cerebellar memory formation. Curr Opin Neurobiol 15: 667-674.
45. Brunel N, Hakim V, Isope P, Nadal JP, Barbour B (2004) Optimal information storage and the distribution of synaptic weights: Perceptron versus Purkinje cell. Neuron 43: 745-757.
46. Kanerva P (1992) Associative-memory models of the cerebellum. In: Aleksander I, Taylor J, eds. International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks. Brighton, UK: North-Holland. pp 23-34.
47. Tyrrell T, Willshaw D (1992) Cerebellar cortex: its simulation and the relevance of Marr's theory. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 336: 239-257.
48. Atkeson CG, Moore AW, Schaal S (1997) Locally weighted learning for control. Artificial Intelligence Rev 11: 75-113.
49. Sastry S, Bodson M (1989) Adaptive Control: Stability, Convergence, and Robustness. Englewood Cliffs N.J.: Prentice-Hall International.
50. Horn RA, Johnson CR (1985) Matrix Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.