Standardization from below: Science and technology standards and educational software

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 110-117

  Fleischmann, Kenneth R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Computers; Frog dissection simulations; Information technology; Science standards; Technology standards

Indexed keywords

EID: 44949229204     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Awalt, C., & Jolly, D. (1999). An inch deep and a mile wide: Electronic tools for savvy administrators. Educational Technology & Society, 2 (3), 97-105.
2. Eglash, R. (1999). African fractals: Modern computing and indigenous design, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
3. Evans, S. M. (2002). Aligning to state standards. Science Teacher, 69 (3), 54-57.
4. Feng, P. (2002). Designing a "global" privacy standard: Politics and expertise in technical standards-setting, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.
5. Fleischmann, K. R. (2003). Frog and cyberfrog are friends: Dissection simulation and animal advocacy. Society and Animals, 11 (2), 123-143.
6. Fleischmann, K. R. (2004). Exploring the design-use interface: The agency of boundary objects in educational technology, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.
7. Fleischmann, K. R. (2005). Virtual dissection and physical collaboration. First Monday, 10 (5), retrieved October 15, 2007 from http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue10_5/fleischmann/index.html.
8. Fleischmann, K. R. (2006a). Do-it-yourself information technology: Role hybridization and the design-use interface. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57 (1), 87-95.
9. Fleischmann, K. R. (2006b). Boundary objects with agency: A method for studying the design-use interface. The Information Society, 22 (2), 77-87.
10. Geertz, C. (1983). Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology, New York: Basic Books.
11. Hess, D. J. (1995). Science and technology in a multicultural world, New York: Columbia University Press.
12. Hoff, D. J. (2002). Science standards have yet to seep into class, panel says. Education Week, 21 (37), 10.
13. Monahan, T. (2005a). The school system as a post-Fordist organization: Fragmented centralization and the emergence of IT specialists. Critical Sociology, 31 (4), 583-615.
14. Monahan, T. (2005b). Globalization, Technological Change, and Public Education, New York: Routledge.
15. National Education Association (2003). Timeline for future NCLB mandates. NEA Today, 21 (8), 34.
16. National Research Council (1996). National Science Education Standards, retrieved October 15, 2007 from http://books.nap.edu/readingroom/ books/nses/.
17. Owen, M. (1999). Appropriate and appropriated technology: technological literacy and educational software standards. Educational Technology & Society, 2 (4), 62-69.
18. nd Ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
19. Swain, C., & Pearson, T. (2002). Educators and technology standards: Influencing the Digital Divide. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34 (3), 326-335.